All,
The following is the approximate schedule for FreeBSD releases in 2006:
Jan 30: Freeze RELENG_5 and RELENG_6
Mar 20: Release FreeBSD 6.1
Apr 3: Release FreeBSD 5.5
Jun 12: Freeze RELENG_6
Jul 31: Release FreeBSD 6.2
Oct 23: Freeze RELENG_6
Dec 11: Release FreeBSD 6.3
A 'freeze' means that
My company is using FreeBSD for two major applications: our file servers
(via Samba), which aren't the subject of this message; and the routers
between branches. Some background follows.
We have essentially two types of branches - Type A, with thier own cable
internet connections, and Type B,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Just spotted the following in the logs of one of our machines
> There seems to errors across too many disks for it to be disk issues.
> Any one seen this before / got any advice?
I'd say ad4 went kaboom and is corrupting traffic on its bus, thus the a
> On Thursday 15 December 2005 03:49 pm, Matt Emmerton wrote:
> > I know this has been discussed ad nauseum, but here's my $0.02:
> >
> > Why not mark these entries as 'mandatory' in /usr/src/sys/conf/files*
> > instead?
> > This will cause config to error out if they are not specified in the
> > c
On Thursday 15 December 2005 03:49 pm, Matt Emmerton wrote:
> I know this has been discussed ad nauseum, but here's my $0.02:
>
> Why not mark these entries as 'mandatory' in /usr/src/sys/conf/files*
> instead?
> This will cause config to error out if they are not specified in the
> config, and han
>on 30.10.2005 11:36 Uhr Cristiano Deana said the following:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
>> 'DEFAULTS':
>>
>> device isa
>>
>> device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices
>> device io # I/O
> I can't see anything in the kernel source code to explain it. Since
> you don't mention actual times, is the difference statistically
> significant? (see src/tools/tools/ministat)
Ministat says: Difference at 95.0% confidence
The second set are always smaller than the first set no matter how
Kevin Oberman wrote:
From: Neal Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:36:12 +0100
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14 Dec 2005, at 20:00, Sam Leffler wrote:
Neal Nelson wrote:
Has anyone got FreeBSD 6.0 to work as a wireless access point using
WPA?
I'm running a Prism 2.5 based w
Neal Nelson wrote:
On 14 Dec 2005, at 20:00, Sam Leffler wrote:
Neal Nelson wrote:
Has anyone got FreeBSD 6.0 to work as a wireless access point using WPA?
I'm running a Prism 2.5 based wireless card and have been using it as
an access point for years. It stills works OK but I installed the
On Thu, 2005-Dec-15 17:59:38 +, Pete French wrote:
>Got some curiuous results when I tested this today by the way.
>I have a twin processor PIII machine. Did a parallel compile on
>it. The actuall wall clock time is faster when I add the 586
>back in. *but* if you look at the user and system ti
> UTSL: The i586 optimised routines were only ever enabled if the CPU
> was identified as a 586. And these routines have been disabled since
> mid-2001. See my mail in the "Odd performance problems..." thread
> for more details.
Got some curiuous results when I tested this today by the way.
I h
> From: Neal Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:36:12 +0100
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 14 Dec 2005, at 20:00, Sam Leffler wrote:
>
> > Neal Nelson wrote:
> >> Has anyone got FreeBSD 6.0 to work as a wireless access point using
> >> WPA?
> >> I'm running a Prism 2.5 ba
On Thu, 2005-Dec-15 15:22:04 +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>Also, the following shell snippet might be helpful:
>
>ipcs | awk '($1=="m"){print $2}' | xargs -n 1 -t ipcrm -m
ipca -ma | awk '$9 == "0"{print $2}' | xargs -n 1 -t ipcrm -m
has the advantage of only removing segments with no processes at
On Thu, 2005-Dec-15 12:53:59 -, Steven Hartland wrote:
>Same here be nice to get a catagoric answer to this.
>
> Steve
>- Original Message -
>From: "Randy Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>I have multiple dual and quad Pentium Pro machines running 4.x that have
>>been
>>remarkably stabl
On 14 Dec 2005, at 20:00, Sam Leffler wrote:
Neal Nelson wrote:
Has anyone got FreeBSD 6.0 to work as a wireless access point using
WPA?
I'm running a Prism 2.5 based wireless card and have been using it as
an access point for years. It stills works OK but I installed the
hostapd port in orde
On Thursday 15 December 2005 15:56, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Quite annoying.
$ tail -2 /usr/local/etc/postfix/sender_access
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 501 Access denied: Owner not
interested in what
is broken on your end
--
Melvyn Sopacua
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 15:59 +0100, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> Is the kernconf in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf still there and is it real file
> (not
> a symlink to a file on the hostmachine)?
You're right. I know i miss something stupid.
Thanks and sorry for the noise.
--
Massimo.run();
___
On Thursday 15 December 2005 15:36, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> I've commented out the KERNCONF definition and used the GENERIC kernel
> and all went fine... ?!
> The name of my kernel is spelled correctly.
Is the kernconf in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf still there and is it real file (not
a symlink to
"Morten A. Middelthon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just got this message after posting to freebsd-stable@freebsd.org:
>
> Subject: Blogger post failed
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 05:32:36 -0800 (PST)
>
> Blogger does not accept multipart/signed f
On Thursday 15 December 2005 04:44 am, wsk wrote:
> lists:
> with DELL PE6850, It seems 6.0 Can't support the
> Intel's E8500 XMB chipset
What doesn't work?
> pciconf -lv:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:9:0: class=0x05 card=0x01701028 chip=0x26208086 rev=0x00
> hdr=0x00
> vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
>
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 12:21 +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Are the /etc/make.conf files in sync on client and server?
Yep, they're empty except the KERNCONF definition
> Did you mount /usr/src and /usr/obj with -maproot=0?
No, i export them as
/usr/src /usr/obj -maproot=root -network=10.0.0.0
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 03:22:04PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Morten A. Middelthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've seen this problem discussed before on various mailinglists and forums,
> > but never any real solutions.
>
> What you describe is an inherent problem with so-called
> System-
wsk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> with DELL PE6850, It seems 6.0 Can't support the
> Intel's E8500 XMB chipset
What exactly is the problem? Actually, your dmesg output
looks pretty good to me. What are you trying to do which
doesn't work for you?
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, sec
Morten A. Middelthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've seen this problem discussed before on various mailinglists and forums,
> but never any real solutions.
What you describe is an inherent problem with so-called
System-V shared memory (SysV ShMem) which doesn't have a
simple solution. But rea
Just btw,
I just got this message after posting to freebsd-stable@freebsd.org:
Subject: Blogger post failed
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 05:32:36 -0800 (PST)
Blogger does not accept multipart/signed files.
Error code: 7.774C07
Original message:
From: [EM
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 05:32:34PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > I guess you're right. I can fill a 256MB swap-backed disk without
> > panic and without swapping.
>
> FYI, this is documented in the manpage.
I think the panic potential should be menti
Claus Guttesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Are the /etc/make.conf files in sync on client and server?
> > Did you mount /usr/src and /usr/obj with -maproot=0?
> > Any other unusual exports or mount options (e.g. noexec)?
>
> It may be the maproot-option. I have the following in my /etc
Hi,
I've seen this problem discussed before on various mailinglists and forums,
but never any real solutions.
It seems to happen right after a video player, such as totem or mplayer, has
crashed. They might crash for different reasons, but the problem afterwards is
always the same.
Mplayer wil
Same here be nice to get a catagoric answer to this.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have multiple dual and quad Pentium Pro machines running 4.x that have
been
remarkably stable using the I686_CPU setting (kudos to the developers!!).
So I add mys
Jonathan Noack wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> Scott Long wrote:
>>
>>> Also, taking out CPU_I586 is usually a bad idea. It offers no
>>> performance penalties (unlike CPU_I386 and maybe CPU_I486), but
>>> enables things like optimized bcopy.
>>
>>
>> Ahh, This is the sort of thing I never rea
> Are the /etc/make.conf files in sync on client and server?
> Did you mount /usr/src and /usr/obj with -maproot=0?
> Any other unusual exports or mount options (e.g. noexec)?
It may be the maproot-option. I have the following in my /etc/exports:
/usr/obj /usr/ports /usr/src-network=xyz-m
Massimo Lusetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm tryng to accomplish this
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/small-lan.html
> to have four boxes updated toghether.
> [...]
> make installkernel KERNCONF=MYNAME
>
> ERROR: No kernel "MYNAME" to install.
> [...]
> Bu
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 11:58 +0100, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> Did you mount /usr/src from the client?
Sure, i've mounted both /usr/src and /usr/obj with the same name with
maproot options (from exports)
--
Massimo.run();
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> I'm tryng to accomplish this
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/small-lan.html
> to have four boxes updated toghether.
>
> I've done almost everything in the docs and have the main machine, the
> one who builds world and kernels, do its own work successfully, now with
> b
I'm tryng to accomplish this
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/small-lan.html
to have four boxes updated toghether.
I've done almost everything in the docs and have the main machine, the
one who builds world and kernels, do its own work successfully, now with
buildworld an
lists:
with DELL PE6850, It seems 6.0 Can't support the
Intel's E8500 XMB chipset
pciconf -lv:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:9:0: class=0x05 card=0x01701028 chip=0x26208086 rev=0x00
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'E8500 XMB A/B/C/D Identification Registers'
class = memory
subclass = RAM
[EM
Michael Sperber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That looks like your rpcbind(8) process died. Can you
> > check that with ps? Also, are there any warnings or
> > errors reported in /var/log/messages?
>
> No, it's still running. It shows up in rpc
On Wed, 2005-Dec-14 16:17:38 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>Also, taking out CPU_I586 is usually a bad idea. It offers no
>performance penalties (unlike CPU_I386 and maybe CPU_I486), but
>enables things like optimized bcopy.
This doesn't quite mesh with my reading of -current and -stable.
The follow
38 matches
Mail list logo
