On Friday 02 December 2005 14.54, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2005 05:00 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> > I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine is
> > an NFS server, and it usually panics early in the morning, when first
> > people try to access it.
>
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/12/06 Tue PM 11:23:18 PST
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Subject: Re: Re: Help - vr0: rx packet loss on new 6.0 kernel
>
OK booted on the old kernel back to 5.4
Does anyone have any idea what may have caused the problem?
Thanks
>
> >
> > From: <[EMAI
>
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/12/06 Tue PM 11:13:31 PST
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Subject: Re: Help - vr0: rx packet loss on new 6.0 kernel
>
>
> >
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2005/12/06 Tue PM 10:57:44 PST
> > To:
> > Subject: Help - vr0: rx packet loss on new 6.
On Mon, 2005-Dec-05 10:15:52 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:42:08AM +0100 I heard the voice of
>> kama, and lo! it spake thus:
>> >
>> > I appreciate that you took time to answer about the different
>> > clocks. But that does not answer why vmstat -i shows a rate of 2000
>
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/12/06 Tue PM 10:57:44 PST
> To:
> Subject: Help - vr0: rx packet loss on new 6.0 kernel
>
> Just upgraded from 5.4 >6.0 and am getting
> vr0: rx packet loss even on single user mode
>
> can anyone please help me to fix the problem
>
> Thanks
cANNOT G
After installing FreeBSD 6.0, I was no longer able to scroll using the wheel on
my Logitech Optical Mouse. I ran moused with the -fd flags and confirmed that
the mouse daemon was catching the z-axis events. My xorg.conf looked OK to me:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Mouse0"
Just upgraded from 5.4 >6.0 and am getting
vr0: rx packet loss even on single user mode
can anyone please help me to fix the problem
Thanks
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscr
Just upgraded from 5.4 >6.0 and am getting
vr0: rx packet loss even on single user mode
can anyone please help me to fix the problem
Thanks
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscr
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:24:31PM -0500, Kenneth W Cochran wrote:
> >Certainly better documentation for the upgrade path between 5.3 and 6.0 would
> >have saved me a h*** of a lot of time.. but there it is.. live does not hand
> >out many A++s
>
> I would guess that it says 5.3 instead of 5.4 du
On Friday, 2 December 2005 at 14:32:58 +0100, kama wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am just wondering why the cpu-timer is doubled from what I set in
> kern.hz?
>
> # vmstat -i
> ...
> cpu0: timer 14314031 1999
>
> # sysctl -a | grep hz
> kern.clockrate: { hz = 1000, tick = 1000, pro
>From: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 19:41:30 -0800
>Cc: Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in libmagic
>
>On Tuesday 06 December 2005 16:5
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 16:50, the author Allen contributed to the
dialogue on-
Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in libmagic:
>On Tue, December 6, 2005 19:44, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, secmgr wrote:
>>> Not to belabour this, but the 6.0 release notes do specif
My setup is:
ASUS Pundant Booksize PC Celeron 2.66Ghz, 512M ram, 4 USB ports.
Attached is one Netcomm USB modem which uses the ucom / uftdi
drivers, and is configured for auto answer.
Source is 6.0 stable as of today 7th Dec 2005.
Devices in /dev that get created are:
cuaU0
cuaU0.init
cuaU0.loc
On Tue, December 6, 2005 19:44, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, secmgr wrote:
>
>> Not to belabour this, but the 6.0 release notes do specificly say 5.3
>> RELEASE
>> and newer.
>
> 5.4-STABLE is newer. :)
>
>> "Source upgrades to FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE are only supported from FreeBSD
>> 5.3
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, secmgr wrote:
Not to belabour this, but the 6.0 release notes do specificly say 5.3 RELEASE
and newer.
5.4-STABLE is newer. :)
"Source upgrades to FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE are only supported from FreeBSD
5.3-RELEASE or later. Users of older systems wanting to upgrade 6.0-RELEA
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:23:42PM -0700, secmgr wrote:
> >>>Update to 5.4 before trying to update to 6.0.
> >>>
> >>>Kris
> >>>
> >>>
> >>So is there any supported direct 5.3->6.0 upgrade path, or is a stop in
> >>5.4 ville manditory now.?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I tried to say that you have to
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:36:05PM -0700, secmgr wrote:
Update to 5.4 before trying to update to 6.0.
Kris
So is there any supported direct 5.3->6.0 upgrade path, or is a stop in
5.4 ville manditory now.?
I tried to say that you have to update to 5.4 bef
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 14:36, the author Doug Barton contributed to the
dialogue on-
Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in libmagic:
>On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Vizion wrote:
>> Just an additional question if some one has time to answer.
>>
>> Should I upgrade my ports from 5.4 as we
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Vizion wrote:
Just an additional question if some one has time to answer.
Should I upgrade my ports from 5.4 as well prior to moving to 6?
No, that's not needed.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Vizion wrote:
Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure in libkrb5 but is currently:
Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in libmagic
You should first upgrade to the latest 5-STABLE (cvs tag RELENG_5), then you
should be able to upgrade to 6-STABLE (cvs tag RELENG_6
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 14:15, the author Vizion contributed to the
dialogue on-
Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in libmagic:
>On Tuesday 06 December 2005 13:28, the author Kris Kennaway contributed to
>the dialogue on-
>
> Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 13:28, the author Kris Kennaway contributed to
the dialogue on-
Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in libmagic:
>On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:20:44PM -0800, Vizion wrote:
>> On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:47, the author Vizion contributed to the
>> dialog
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 23:46, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:36:05PM -0700, secmgr wrote:
> > >Update to 5.4 before trying to update to 6.0.
> > >
> > >Kris
> >
> > So is there any supported direct 5.3->6.0 upgrade path, or is a
> > stop in 5.4 ville manditory now.?
>
> I tr
The error also appeared without optimizations. So far compiling with
optimizations has never caused any trouble for me.
Now it is working without problems. I suspect that it was a cooling
problem of my RAM.
Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:48:30 +0100
> "[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:36:05PM -0700, secmgr wrote:
> >Update to 5.4 before trying to update to 6.0.
> >
> >Kris
> >
> >
> So is there any supported direct 5.3->6.0 upgrade path, or is a stop in
> 5.4 ville manditory now.?
I tried to say that you have to update to 5.4 before you can update
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:20:44PM -0800, Vizion wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:47, the author Vizion contributed to the
dialogue which was on-
Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure in libkrb5 but is currently:
Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:20:44PM -0800, Vizion wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:47, the author Vizion contributed to the
> dialogue which was on-
> Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure in libkrb5 but is currently:
> Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in libmagic
> >On Tue
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:47, the author Vizion contributed to the
dialogue which was on-
Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure in libkrb5 but is currently:
Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in libmagic
>On Tuesday 06 December 2005 04:00, the author Ruslan Ermilov contribute
On Mar 6 décembre 2005 15:48, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> Gcc segfaults for me during a buildworld.
it shouldn't happend. you know that.
> cc -pg -O2 -pipe -march=pentium-m -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Dyylval=pcapyylval
> -I/usr/src/lib/libpcap -I. -D_U_="__attribute__((unused))"
> -DHAVE_SNPRINTF -DHAVE_VSNPRI
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:37:59AM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:
>
> "Igor Robul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:20:28PM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:
> >>#optionsZERO_COPY_SOCKETS
> >>
> >>What's the status of this in 6.0-R
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 04:00, the author Ruslan Ermilov contributed to
the dialogue on-
Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure in libkrb5:
>On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:18:43PM -0800, Vizion wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have tried repeatedly to get make buildworld for upgrading from freebsd
>>
"Vivek Khera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 6, 2005, at 7:37 AM, Joshua Coombs wrote:
Ok, lemmie just point out that I'm already running 6.0, just to
eliminate that issue.
So you were not truthful about running a 386...
No, I'm running on a 386. It's
On Dec 6, 2005, at 7:37 AM, Joshua Coombs wrote:
Ok, lemmie just point out that I'm already running 6.0, just to
eliminate that issue.
So you were not truthful about running a 386...
What I'm curious about is weather or not 6.0R's zero copy sockets
are considered stable or not.
Works fo
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 01:14:01PM -0600, Michael Bowerman wrote:
>The poblem ended up being that I had in my make.conf:
>CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe
>CXXFLAGS= -O2 -pipe
>
>I ended up just removing the CXXFLAGS line. I probably cold have used
>CXXFLAGS+=... But, I don't think I have a
Gcc segfaults for me during a buildworld.
In my make.conf:
CPUTYPE?= pentium-m
CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe
My last successful build was:
FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE (TPR40-6) #0: Sat Nov 26 23:13:30 CET 2005
# make update
was run right before building.
Here's a tail of the buildworld log.
"Igor Robul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:20:28PM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:
#optionsZERO_COPY_SOCKETS
What's the status of this in 6.0-R and 6-stable? The idea of
avoiding
memory copies when possible seems really a
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:18:43PM -0800, Vizion wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have tried repeatedly to get make buildworld for upgrading from freebsd 5.3
> to 6.0 but get repeated failure in libkrb5.
>
> FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENER
The message "Freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" from Bounced mail, sent on 12/6/2005
13:45 was quarantined because it contained either an executable file, a batch
file or a screen saver file. All of these types of attachments are considered
security risks. Please consult your mail administrator who can
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:12:44PM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:04:24 +0100, Igor Robul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 12:59:14AM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> >>However, if I look in /dev, I only see the generic usb[0-3] devices.
> >>When I used to r
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:04:48PM +0800, Z R wrote:
> Hi,
>Today, I want to copy a file to a msdosfs mounted on my
> FreeBSD-6.0-STABLE. I typed "cp /data1/books", then I hit the TAB. It
> doesn't response. After a few seconds, the "login:" appears. The csh core
> dump.
csh is maintaine
Sorry, fotget my hardware configuration. It's a IBM ThinkPad T23 2647-4NC.
Piii 1.13, 512M SDR, 40G(HITACHI 5k80), 10/100M Ethernet modem combo card,
wifi card original.
2005/12/6, Z R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>Today, I want to copy a file to a msdosfs mounted on my
> FreeBSD-6.0-STABLE.
Hi,
Today, I want to copy a file to a msdosfs mounted on my
FreeBSD-6.0-STABLE. I typed "cp /data1/books", then I hit the TAB. It
doesn't response. After a few seconds, the "login:" appears. The csh core
dump.
In the /var/log/message, says "dos2unixtime(): month value out of range
(15)"
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:18:43PM -0800, Vizion wrote:
> I have tried repeatedly to get make buildworld for upgrading from freebsd
> 5.3 to 6.0 but get repeated failure in libkrb5.
Maybe you should update to the latest 5-STABLE before uprading to
6-STABLE.
> I have tried with very helpful ad
43 matches
Mail list logo
