From: George Hartzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jacques Garrigue writes:
> > From: Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > I've got a strange problem with my IBM T42 / Radeon M10 setup.
> > >
> > > When using the 6.0-RELEASE kernel (including GENERIC), I cannot go to
> > > sleep when X11 is r
I know I'm a couple weeks late, but I've been having the same problem
with my 300-8x. It seems that after a seemingly random period of time on
my dual opteron box, the system just hangs. It did kernel panic once
when I was taking down the geom array. Originally I thought it might
have something
Jacques Garrigue writes:
> From: Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I've got a strange problem with my IBM T42 / Radeon M10 setup.
> >
> > When using the 6.0-RELEASE kernel (including GENERIC), I cannot go to
> > sleep when X11 is running: the machine freezes, display still on. I
> > t
On Fri, 2005-Dec-02 14:32:58 +0100, kama wrote:
>I am just wondering why the cpu-timer is doubled from what I set in
>kern.hz?
>
># vmstat -i
>interrupt total rate
...
>cpu0: timer 14314031 1999
>Total 14750922
Hello,
I'm tracking 6-STABLE, and cvsup'ed sources as of
6:00am GMT today (in fact, I did this yesterday, too,
with a fresh copy of the repository).
Upon building world, I got the following error:
[...]
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a /usr/src/sbin/mksnap_ffs/mksnap_ffs.c
echo mksnap_ffs:
On Friday 02 December 2005 12:04, Marco Calviani wrote:
>
> Well, i've tried decreasing the polling interval, but there is an
> increased powerd cpu load: at 100ms polling interval the cpu load is
> to an astonishing 20% circa, which i think it's too much for a normal
> use. The sampling rate with
Marco Calviani wrote:
Hi list,
2005/12/2, Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I don't see why you can't run powerd more frequently, I do.. Unless your ACPI
has a problem that means the transition is slow.
I'm sure this could not be done under Linux without a lot of
problems (it is required t
On Friday 02 December 2005 14.54, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2005 05:00 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> > I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine is
> > an NFS server, and it usually panics early in the morning, when first
> > people try to access it.
Hi Nate,
2005/12/2, Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This work is easy, it's just grunt work implementing and testing to see
> which is best. See this page for details on how to proceed:
>
> http://wikitest.freebsd.org/moin.cgi/powerd
>
> Wikitest seems to be down so here's the text only:
> ht
Hi list,
2005/12/2, Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I don't see why you can't run powerd more frequently, I do.. Unless your
> > ACPI
> > has a problem that means the transition is slow.
>
> I'm sure this could not be done under Linux without a lot of
> problems (it is required to use the
On Friday 02 December 2005 05:00 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine is
> an NFS server, and it usually panics early in the morning, when first
> people try to access it. After reboot it may work OK for 1-2 days, and then
> panics ag
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:35:54PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 19:35, Marco Calviani wrote:
> > > It's not present under powerd for the simple fact that to be efficient
> > > in term of not being too intrusive (kernel to user data transfers, etc),
> > > powerd can only provid
Hi,
I am just wondering why the cpu-timer is doubled from what I set in
kern.hz?
# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq1: atkbd0 4 0
irq6: fdc087 0
irq13: npx01
Since sometime in the not-so-distant past, I've lost my xv support in
Xorg. This seems to be related to /dev/agpgart beeing gone, but agp is
certainly in my kernel. The chipset is Intel 855GM and running on a Dell
Latitude x300. I've got a custom kernel, but I haven't changed my kernconf
in mo
On Friday 02 December 2005 08:05, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> I run powerd like this ->
> /usr/sbin/powerd -i 90 -r 30 -a adaptive -b adaptive -n adaptive -p 200
Hi
n my NB an Acer 3002 I got best battery life with
-a max -r 30 -i 80 -b adaptive
any other settings resulted in continuous cpufreq
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 19:35, Marco Calviani wrote:
> > It's not present under powerd for the simple fact that to be efficient
> > in term of not being too intrusive (kernel to user data transfers, etc),
> > powerd can only provide a limited number of check per second (at this
> > time, 2 per second).
I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine is an
NFS server, and it usually panics early in the morning, when first people try
to access it. After reboot it may work OK for 1-2 days, and then panics
again. I have tried changing memory and replacing disk which was expo
Marco Calviani wrote:
Hi Bruno,
> > 2) sorry what about the point that we were discussing above? The high
number of transition you were explaining me, are present in the actual
implementation of powerd, and if not, why?
It's not present under powerd for the simple fact that to be efficient
Hi Bruno,
> > 2) sorry what about the point that we were discussing above? The high
> > number of transition you were explaining me, are present in the actual
> > implementation of powerd, and if not, why?
>
> It's not present under powerd for the simple fact that to be efficient
> in term of not
19 matches
Mail list logo
