Hi,
The sk device has no polling support,
neither in 5 nor in 6.
Is there a particular reason (maybe
because it's a Gigabit device) ?
Or is polling not supported because it
simply has not yet been coded? If so, would
it be straightforward to add the code?
Thanks,
Rob.
Hi,
The sk device has no polling support,
neither in 5 nor in 6.
Is there a particular reason (maybe
because it's a Gigabit device) ?
Or is polling not supported because it
simply has not yet been coded? If so, would
it be straightforward to add the code?
Thanks,
Rob.
__
Hi,
I need help about ATM support on FreeBSD 6. The configuration was working on
FreeBSD 5 Stable but was not working 6 stable. I have FORE PCA-200E ATM PCI
card. And my kernel config as follows:
# ATM Devices
device atm
device hfa
# options NATM
# ATM Related Settings ...
options A
Greetings from DriverGuide.com.
We're sorry. You replied to a notification-only address that cannot
accept incoming e-mail. But that's OK--this automated response will
direct you to the right place at DriverGuide.com to answer your question.
Many common questions are answered in our FAQ, please
> A custom kernel compiled with options PERFMON and cputype=athlon when ran on
> an athlon causes ATA to not probe devices on FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE. dmesg
> seems normal except the ata probe is never done, so the only boot devices
> available is the floppy.
AFAIR, "PERFMON" only supports Pentium an
Hello all,
I've been digging through Google for more information on this. I have a
4.8 box that's been up for about 430 days. In the last week or so, top
and ps have started reporting all CPU usage numbers as zero, and running
"systat -vmstat" results in the message "The alternate system clo
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:33:50PM -0800, Rob wrote:
> --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I commented on it elsewhere in this thread.
>
> Do you mean your comment on the swap_pager error:
>
> Quote:
> "AFAICT that is just a trigger-happy timer..it's
> supposed to detect when
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I commented on it elsewhere in this thread.
Do you mean your comment on the swap_pager error:
Quote:
"AFAICT that is just a trigger-happy timer..it's
supposed to detect when a swap operation took too
long to complete, but it also triggers on
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 02:52:12PM -0800, Rob wrote:
> --- Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Basically, wait until your system deadlocks. BREAK
> > into DDB.
> > As a start, run 'show lockedvnods', 'ps'. My guess
> > is that you'll see a lock that has a number of
> waiters
> > whic
--- Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Basically, wait until your system deadlocks. BREAK
> into DDB.
> As a start, run 'show lockedvnods', 'ps'. My guess
> is that you'll see a lock that has a number of
waiters
> which is probably the culprit.
> Use 'panic' to get a crashdump and then
A custom kernel compiled with options PERFMON and cputype=athlon when ran on
an athlon causes ATA to not probe devices on FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE. dmesg
seems normal except the ata probe is never done, so the only boot devices
available is the floppy.
Just something I noticed in passing, not open
Joel Hatton wrote:
> What was the rationale behind changing this behaviour for 206_1?
That xterm should install as xterm and not xterm-static.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubsc
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Rob wrote:
I have upgraded to 6-Stable.
The swapinfo command gives wrong output:
Device1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity
/dev/md0 13107211848 131072 9%
I guess, the math should be:
"1K-blocks" = "Used" + "Avail"
However, "1K-blocks" = "Avail", irresp
Either at the 4.x or 6.x versions ... ? I'm looking at an HP 1U server
that has this included ... will this be a problem?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Ok, just got this not so very nice error on a RELENG_6_0 box (built
from sources this morning, GENERIC kernel minus drivers I dont use):
Nov 17 15:35:43 elfi kernel: subdisk10: detached
Nov 17 15:35:43 elfi kernel: ad10: detached
Nov 17 15:35:43 elfi kernel: unknown: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:40:36 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pldrouin> Yep, smart battery is definately the problem. The
performance of my pldrouin> laptop is back to normal whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I have upgraded to 6-Stable.
| The swapinfo command gives wrong output:
|
| Device1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity
| /dev/md0 13107211848 131072 9%
|
| I guess, the math should be:
| "1K-blocks" = "Used" +
Hi,
I have upgraded to 6-Stable.
The swapinfo command gives wrong output:
Device1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity
/dev/md0 13107211848 131072 9%
I guess, the math should be:
"1K-blocks" = "Used" + "Avail"
However, "1K-blocks" = "Avail", irrespective
of what is used.
In
On Thursday 17 November 2005 08:46 am, David Xu wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> >I have a patch for nve(4) which fixes at least one known LOR in the driver
> > and generally fixes up the locking. If you have an nve(4) card that
> > currently works, please test this patch to make sure it doesn't bre
John Baldwin wrote:
I have a patch for nve(4) which fixes at least one known LOR in the driver and
generally fixes up the locking. If you have an nve(4) card that currently
works, please test this patch to make sure it doesn't break anything. If you
have an nve(4) card that doesn't work, thi
Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, when I insert a CF card with normal partioning I need /dev/da0s1,
> and this is not present in the /dev filesystem because the partition table
> has not been read.
>
> # mount -t msdos /dev/da0s1 /mnt/cf
> mount_msdosfs: /dev/da0s1: No such
After noticing the problem went away in Safe Mode, and then figuring out
what Safe Mode actually does*, I've worked around the problem by disabling
the APIC device, which, I gather, forces FreeBSD to use the old-fashioned
IRQ timers. This fix will not work if you want to run an SMP kernel in
V
> Lars Kristiansen wrote:
> >
> > Hello again, I am the "me too"-guy with console-access.
>
> Hi Lars,
>
> I'm the one who started this thread, when I could not compile a new
> kernel after I upgraded to 6 (Pentium-1, 150 MHz, 32 MB Ram).
>
> How do you trigger the deadlock?
>
> The only way
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-Nov-17 00:00:03 -0800, Rob wrote:
>
>>The only way I know of how to trigger the deadlock, is to compile
>>a new kernel and the 'linking kernel' stage will lock-up the PC.
>>With a regular kernel, this takes 2.5 hours until deadlock, but with
>>a fully equip
On Thu, 2005-Nov-17 00:00:03 -0800, Rob wrote:
> The only way I know of how to trigger the deadlock, is to compile
> a new kernel and the 'linking kernel' stage will lock-up the PC.
> With a regular kernel, this takes 2.5 hours until deadlock, but with
> a fully equipped debug kernel it takes about
Lars Kristiansen wrote:
>
> Hello again, I am the "me too"-guy with console-access.
Hi Lars,
I'm the one who started this thread, when I could not compile a new
kernel after I upgraded to 6 (Pentium-1, 150 MHz, 32 MB Ram).
How do you trigger the deadlock?
The only way I know of how
26 matches
Mail list logo
