Hi, everybody,
I hope this is the right place that I post to!
When I enabled polling in 5.4 and 4.11, I found that CPU load
in 5.4 is much higher than 4.11. For example, suppose HZ is 5000, in 5.4
the idle CPU is about 87%, but in 4.11, the idle CPU is about 99.9%. Is
this
So I had this "brilliant" idea that I was going to install FreeBSD on my new
amd64 system using a 512MB flash drive since I didn't feel like digging out a CD-ROM. I
ended up installing from CD anyway, but I thought I'd share my experience in case anyone
else knows how to do this.
My first thou
On 08/20/05 19:28, Johny Mattsson wrote:
I've run into a problem in that it appears that the root mount
gets marked with MNT_NOEXEC for some reason, which causes ld-elf.so.1 to
barf with a message of:
Cannot execute objects on /
Okay, this one's for the archive, in case anyone else runs into
At 05:05 PM 22/08/2005, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2005.08.22 16:24:12 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> [verify1] /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools# smartctl -a ad0
> smartctl version 5.33 [i386-portbld-freebsd6.0] Copyright (C) 2002-4
> Bruce Allen
> Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
On 2005.08.22 16:24:12 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> [verify1] /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools# smartctl -a ad0
> smartctl version 5.33 [i386-portbld-freebsd6.0] Copyright (C) 2002-4
> Bruce Allen
> Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
I think you have to specify full path for the
At 04:54 PM 22/08/2005, damir bikmuhametov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:24:12PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
> noticed was that the smartmontools and atacontrol seems to be broken
> now.
[...]
> [verify1] /usr/ports/sysutil
At 04:45 PM 22/08/2005, Kevin Oberman wrote:
The arguments for atacontrol have changed. The update to the man pages
was committed to current in the past day or two. I'm not sure it it has
made it to RELENG_6.
You can't just specify the channel number any more. The channel is now
the device name
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:24:12PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
> noticed was that the smartmontools and atacontrol seems to be broken
> now.
[...]
> [verify1] /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools# atacontrol cap 0 0
> usage: atac
> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:38:15 -0400
> From: Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> At 04:33 PM 22/08/2005, Søren Schmidt wrote:
>
> >On 22/08/2005, at 22:24, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
> >>noticed
At 04:33 PM 22/08/2005, Søren Schmidt wrote:
On 22/08/2005, at 22:24, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
noticed was that the smartmontools and atacontrol seems to be
broken now. I updated smartmon to the latest in the ports, but same
problem
On 22/08/2005, at 22:24, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
noticed was that the smartmontools and atacontrol seems to be
broken now. I updated smartmon to the latest in the ports, but same
problem.
The ioctl ABI to ATA has changed, yo
I updated one of our boxes from RELENG_5 to 6. Couple of things I
noticed was that the smartmontools and atacontrol seems to be broken
now. I updated smartmon to the latest in the ports, but same problem.
atapci0: port
0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f at device 31.2 on pci
I am out of the office. I will be back on 8/29/05.
Have a nice day.
Dieter Megger
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
At 12:56 PM 22/08/2005, Colin Farley wrote:
I have made this change on the switch my virtual machines are connected to.
We use HP PorCurve switches, unfortunately the switch needs to be rebooted
for the change to take effect, I will have to do this late tonight. I will
let you know the outcome.
I have made this change on the switch my virtual machines are connected to.
We use HP PorCurve switches, unfortunately the switch needs to be rebooted
for the change to take effect, I will have to do this late tonight. I will
let you know the outcome.
Colin
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Can you try having your network guys enable 'portfast' on your server
> > port, and then see if adding an IP alias still causes the hang?
>
> I'd love to, but I know nothing about the Cisco switches other then the
> very bare minimal ... if you can
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, dpk wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Now, on one of our newer servers runnign a fairly recent cvsup of 4.x, the
fxp driver is doing the exact same thing ... all the other fxp based
servers do a nice quick 'ifconfig alias' for an IP, and arp broadcasts ar
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Now, on one of our newer servers runnign a fairly recent cvsup of 4.x, the
> fxp driver is doing the exact same thing ... all the other fxp based
> servers do a nice quick 'ifconfig alias' for an IP, and arp broadcasts are
> sent out, but on this one,
I am also having them problem with the lnc driver. It seems that
sometimes, when an alias is added gratuitous arp packets are not sent out
and until arp cache is expired or the arp table on the router is cleared
the host is unreachable. It seems completely random and there seems to be
no way to p
Volker wrote:
> After inspecting the problem I found that the default of
> daily_status_security_diff_flags in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf is "-b
> -u" but the ${filter} expression in /etc/periodic/security.functions is
> being set to grep '^>'
>
> diff produces a +/- diff format but the output is
Hi folks,
since running on RELENG_6 starting last week on my home server, I'm not
getting any useful periodic security output anymore.
After inspecting the problem I found that the default of
daily_status_security_diff_flags in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf is "-b
-u" but the ${filter} expression i
21 matches
Mail list logo
