It seems like a HW problem. I would run a memory test, check the
temperature, slowdown bios memory timing. Cheers, Vladimir.
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
Firefox keeps taking X11 and then the whole machine with it. It
requires a hard reset as even pinging the machine does not w
Chuck Swiger wrote:
If it's going to be a big database server, why aren't you using all of
those drive spindles to help break up the I/O load? :-)
I have other drives for other things, but I still end up with a single large
volume. Thanks for the suggestion.
__
Brandon Fosdick wrote:
Erik Stian Tefre wrote:
You can avoid the problem by splitting the array up in partitions
smaller than
2TB each. (I know this does not answer your question, but it
simplifies things,
and it works for me(TM)... :-)
:) Thanks, but I thought of that already. This is going
Firefox keeps taking X11 and then the whole machine with it. It
requires a hard reset as even pinging the machine does not work. Only
Firefox seems to be doing this.
Does anyone else have the same problem?
Anyone knows how to solve/debug this?
I've been having this problem for about a month
Firefox keeps taking X11 and then the whole machine with it. It
requires a hard reset as even pinging the machine does not work. Only
Firefox seems to be doing this.
Does anyone else have the same problem?
Anyone knows how to solve/debug this?
In my case the problem was solved by uninstallin
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
> Any suggestions? Are there specialized raid test suites or should I just
> write a script that writes/deletes a lot of files?
That's what I did -- lots of dds running with high block sizes, filling
the partition, then forcing an unclean flag (umount,
dpk wrote:
Whatever you end up doing (we used auto-carving here, had to
unfortunately) be sure to test the partitions fully before proceeding.
Any suggestions? Are there specialized raid test suites or should I just write
a script that writes/deletes a lot of files?
___
Dan Rue wrote:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-April/084557.html
Though, I didn't find the dd and disklabel steps necessary.
It appears that the dd step is necessary to clean out any cruft left over from
previous attempts. In my case it erased the gpt stuff.
Mikael Krantz wrote:
I had the same problem with 8x400 disk on a areca hardware sata card in
fbsd 5.4-stable. Soo I just did newfs -m 2 -U -O 2 -i 262144 /dev/da0
with those options as I needed as much space as possible.
Ok, so that appears to have worked. Is there any benefit to doing this? Or
Hi, Yar!
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:34:09 +0400 Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:28:35PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:19:24 +0400 Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:15:07PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I ran into a problem that mi
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:40:39 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:32:02AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > Just a couple of hours cvsupped 6.0-CURRENT (from end of july 2005) to
> > RELENG_6. Makeworld, kernel was fine, but at the beginning of
> > installworld
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:40:39 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:32:02AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > Just a couple of hours cvsupped 6.0-CURRENT (from end of july 2005) to
> > RELENG_6. Makeworld, kernel was fine, but at the beginning of
> > installworld
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:32:02AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Just a couple of hours cvsupped 6.0-CURRENT (from end of july 2005) to
> RELENG_6. Makeworld, kernel was fine, but at the beginning of
> installworld i've got:
>
> -
> ===> lib/csu/i386-elf (install)
> install -C -o
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:13:29AM -0700, dpk wrote:
> The most recent general data available appears to be at:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/
With my bugmeister hat on, I will note that I have tried to flag PRs
about this issue with the tag '[2T]' and I would encourage anyone filin
Hi!
Just a couple of hours cvsupped 6.0-CURRENT (from end of july 2005) to
RELENG_6. Makeworld, kernel was fine, but at the beginning of
installworld i've got:
-
===> lib/csu/i386-elf (install)
install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 crt1.o crti.o crtn.o gcrt1.o /usr/lib
===> lib/libcom_err (ins
Chris wrote:
Thanks for all replies and suggestions. sounds like I can give 6 a try.
I can move the hd to a bigger machine for installing and compiling.
...except that pcic and card have been removed from -current :( so it's
back to 5.4R
chris
__
My dell Sc430 Server with Freebsd 5.4 gives soon after a reboot and minimal
harddisk actions (erase a file or directory) strange messages concerning
Adaptec SCSI adapter:
ahd0: Recovery Initiated - Card was not paused
Dump Card State Begins <
ahd0: Dumping Card State at progr
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:58:36AM -0700, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
> > I recently dealt with the same controller, with a 3TB array. My
> > solution is tons easier than dealing with gpt or breaking it up. So
> > long as you don't need to boot from the raid, and you just want it as
> > one big disk,
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
> Now that my shiny new 9500S is installed and not fighting for IRQs, I've
> created and initialized a ~2.5TB array using the bios utility. So the
> next step is mounting the new array.
>
> I naively tried following the regular handbook instructions for
Brandon Fosdick wrote:
>>I recently dealt with the same controller, with a 3TB array. My
>>solution is tons easier than dealing with gpt or breaking it up. So
>>long as you don't need to boot from the raid, and you just want it as
>>one big disk, forget partitioning it. newfs the device directl
> I recently dealt with the same controller, with a 3TB array. My
> solution is tons easier than dealing with gpt or breaking it up. So
> long as you don't need to boot from the raid, and you just want it as
> one big disk, forget partitioning it. newfs the device directly, and
> mount it direct
On 8/15/05, Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scot Hetzel wrote:
> > Try 6.0 BETA2 and see if you have similar problems.
> >
> exactly the same problems and the same hard-hang.
> Unluckily, the bootonly.iso doesn't seem to support a serial console...
> or does it ?!
> I do have a serial n
Hej Scot,
Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 8/15/05, Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since the SCSI controller (some kind of) worked before, I'd really like
to know what had happened and why it doesn't work anymore ...
I can help testing, since this machine is a testing machine only :-)
Try
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:04:43PM -0700, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
> Now that my shiny new 9500S is installed and not fighting for IRQs, I've
> created and initialized a ~2.5TB array using the bios utility. So the next
> step is mounting the new array.
> I naively tried following the regular handb
On 8/15/05, Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Don't know wether problems with 6.0 BETA1 belong to freebsd-current@ or
> freebsd-stable, so if I'm wrong, sorry in advance.
>
> I'm about to test FreeBSD 6.0 BETA1 on my Dell Precision 720
> Workstation. Just thought I'd help wi
Hi,
I have a server set up to boot from a gvinum mirror volume. This was
all working fine, so I then proceeded to load my data on it, safe in
the knowledge that all was well.
However, all was not well after the last reboot: it seems that while
the two ATA disks probe, for some odd reason GEOM doe
Yann Golanski wrote:
Firefox keeps taking X11 and then the whole machine with it. It
requires a hard reset as even pinging the machine does not work. Only
Firefox seems to be doing this.
Does anyone else have the same problem?
Anyone knows how to solve/debug this?
; uname -a
FreeBSD ru
Firefox keeps taking X11 and then the whole machine with it. It
requires a hard reset as even pinging the machine does not work. Only
Firefox seems to be doing this.
Does anyone else have the same problem?
Anyone knows how to solve/debug this?
; uname -a
FreeBSD rubicon.york.ac.uk 5.4-STAB
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:14:50PM +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying the ULE scheduler again on my single i686 5.4PRE laptop,
> but it causes the kernel to freeze after some time (>=30 minutes): the
> kernel does not even respond to opening/closing the lid when booting
> verbose (nor
2 weeks ago we switch our mx'es to 6.0-beta(1/2) and nfs locking
test tool hang in uninterruptbl state: ps axc shows state "D".
Without rpcbind/rpc.statd/rpc.lockd tool receives correct errno
45 EOPNOTSUPP Operation not supported.
Tool src (sniffed from @freebsd.org ML's):
==8<
--
UKR.NET Postmaster
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi All,
Don't know wether problems with 6.0 BETA1 belong to freebsd-current@ or
freebsd-stable, so if I'm wrong, sorry in advance.
I'm about to test FreeBSD 6.0 BETA1 on my Dell Precision 720
Workstation. Just thought I'd help with testing :)
I downloaded the 6.0 BETA1 bootonly iso and tried boo
32 matches
Mail list logo
