Hi,
I have apache2 running, with ssl. now, if i call my domain in a browser
not using https, i cannot connect.
ps aux shows this:
root59847 0.0 4.3 7528 4544 ?? Ss5:34PM 0:12.11
/usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL
www 59848 0.0 6.5 9368 6888 ?? I 5:34PM 0:03.80
/usr/local
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:48:04PM -0700, Ben Jencks wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On my Thinkpad T43p, the bge card seems to be unreliable in giving link
> state events. This causes dhclient to behave incorrectly (at least my
> understanding of correctly, given what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On my Thinkpad T43p, the bge card seems to be unreliable in giving link
state events. This causes dhclient to behave incorrectly (at least my
understanding of correctly, given what I've read on -current, -questions
and -stable).
I'm starting with the
Marten wrote:
IMHO When a kernel does not build the script should exit, instead of
processing an image without a kernel.
please consider this patch
http://martenvijn.nl/tinybsd/kernel_build_error_patch.txt
Marten
Hi Marten,
I've just released a new version with your patch, 0.5. Thanks
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:57:06PM +0200, Martin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've tried two benchmarks to check the speed of my
> system on two FreeBSD architectures i386 and amd64.
> I've never seen anyone posting this kind of benchmark,
> so here is what I found out:
>
> here the results of nbench:
> h
On Wed, July 27, 2005 4:40 pm, Marco Wertejuk said:
> Salut,
>
> I'm trying to run 5.4-stable on apples developer transition kit
> but the em-driver does not recognize the Intel Pro 1000 PM onboard
> card, which works with 6.0-SNAP1.
Try this patch that was pointed out to me recently :)
http://p
Hello,
Yesterday was commited a new TinyBSD version, 0.4. For those following
closely the project this version is more stable than the last versions.
This version has some new features, like pre configured images for
specific server types.
First, update your ports and reinstall the tinybsd:
On Jul 27, 2005, at 11:52 AM, Vivek Khera wrote:
The amd64 memory architecture is NUMA -- that is, depending on how
your RAM is layed out, some of it is faster to access for each
processor. Accessing RAM "local" to the other processor(s) is slower.
There are many subtle issues relating to
On Jul 26, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Martin wrote:
Please notice the memory speed penalties while the
system is running on amd64 kernel. I would like to
know what causes this kind of low performance when
memory is being accessed.
The amd64 memory architecture is NUMA -- that is, depending on how
y
Salut,
I'm trying to run 5.4-stable on apples developer transition kit
but the em-driver does not recognize the Intel Pro 1000 PM onboard
card, which works with 6.0-SNAP1.
Can this functionality be backported?
Current is to slow for being used because of the debug settings
and I'd like to wait un
- Original Message Header -
Subject: Re: need help linking??
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org;
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
---
Warning: Attachment contains virus code or meets the filtering/blocking rules.
Use caution when accessing
- Original Message Header -
Subject: Re: 4.11 vs. 5.4 stablity
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org;
---
Warning: Attachment contains virus code or meets the filtering/blocking rules.
Use caution when accessin
Martin wrote:
But I'm impressed by the RELENG_6 results. I think I'm going to
upgrade my system instantly.
Yes, the results are slightly better, even the support of amd64 appears
to be much better, but I would be careful; it's easy to overrate
benchmark results. There is a lot that you can d
When i try to install freebsd 6.0 beta 1 on my VMWare
5 which runs on suse-9.3, it bombs out with this error
:
panic : Duplicate free of item 0xc1920084 from zone
0xc144adc0(g_bio)
Anyone having the same thing ?
Start your da
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:57:06PM +0200, Martin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've tried two benchmarks to check the speed of my
> system on two FreeBSD architectures i386 and amd64.
My results for amd64 (haven't tried i386):
Hardware:
Athlon64 3400+ (2.4 GHz, 400 MHz FSB)
MSI Neo FSR (MSI-6702)
2x512 MB
15 matches
Mail list logo
