Daniel, Alexander,
thanks a lot for your suggestions.
So far I've made good progress. For the time being I'll buffer in
kernel space - I'll look into the pipe stuff later. I just implemented
tsleep and wakeup for the read blocking. After major problems when
starting, this is going to be fun :-)
T
At 10:15 AM 22/06/2005, ya hoo wrote:
Hi ALL,
Just wanted to know if there are any known issues with these chipsets.
Heck, better yet, Is there a website that has a list of all supporting
intel chipsets for 5.4 stable?
Best thing to do is search through the lists. If there is a problem, people
Hi ALL,
Just wanted to know if there are any known issues with these chipsets.
Heck, better yet, Is there a website that has a list of all supporting
intel chipsets for 5.4 stable?
Thanks,
-
Yahoo! Sports
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:03:53PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> A> > Fixing this one is harder. We take la from unlocked rtentry obtained via
> A> > rt_check(), or from arplookup(). The latter drops lock on rtentry, too.
> A> > Then we do some work and use this la. It m
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:03:53PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > Fixing this one is harder. We take la from unlocked rtentry obtained via
A> > rt_check(), or from arplookup(). The latter drops lock on rtentry, too.
A> > Then we do some work and use this la. It may have already been freed in
A>
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> [ cc'ing parties involved in this part of code]
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:07:01PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> T> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:04:27AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> T> J> #25 0xc05a0a0b in m_freem (mb=0x0) at uma.h:304
> T> J> No locals.
> T> J> #26 0
> I Am running 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sun May 8 18:23:40
> CEST 2005 with Adaptec 29320 or 2930U2 controller and with heavy load
> on SCSI I have the following problems ending with system freeze. Have
> anybody some opinion where could be problem?
>
> Thanks a lot Tomas Randa
>
> da0:
Hi Oliver,
2005/6/22, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Michael Schuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > now i have another question, if i use the same Os in 2 versions
> > (RELENG_4, RELENG_5) can i hope that the tests are made on the same
> > part of disk?
>
>
> Hope you always can. But rel
Michael Schuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> now i have another question, if i use the same Os in 2 versions
> (RELENG_4, RELENG_5) can i hope that the tests are made on the same
> part of disk?
Hope you always can. But rely on it you should not.
;-)
> or in other words can an dd on the two
On Tue, 2005-Jun-21 17:24:46 -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:37:42PM +0700, Khanh Cao Van wrote:
>> hi , I could not findout the "# cd /usr/src/lib/libpthread" as your
>> answer bellow ,please help me to fix this problem
>
>Yeah, 4.x actually uses libc_r.
Sorry
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 10:17:04AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
D> > D> Thanks for clarifying guys. Are either of you in a position to upgrade
to
D> > D> -stable and see if the problem persists?
D> >
D> > Does STABLE have an other version of BIND?
D>
D> Not newer than 5.4, no, but it does have othe
11 matches
Mail list logo
