Re: applying the vesa patch to stable for high console resolution

2005-06-13 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:06:50PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Hi, > > Has this patch beeen applied to CURRENT? So it will be in the next > release of FreeBSD? > Yes, about two weeks ago. - Christian -- Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Key:

RE: applying the vesa patch to stable for high console resolution

2005-06-13 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Hi, Has this patch beeen applied to CURRENT? So it will be in the next release of FreeBSD? Ted >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Didier Wiroth >Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:46 PM >To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >Cc: freebsd-questions@fr

Re: ipf Kernel Panic log.. w/ Vonage linksys RT31P2, 5.4 Stable, IPF + IPNAT

2005-06-13 Thread Louis Mamakos
The Vonage RT31P2 does not talk H.323, and it's not necessary to do anything other than plain vanilla NAT to have it work through a firewall. That is, no port forwarding, no SIP payload re-writing, etc. Just plain vanilla NAT for both the SIP signaling and the RTP payload will be all that's n

Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux

2005-06-13 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 01:24, Pete French wrote: > I'm kind of embarassed to have to ask, as this should surely be very > simple, but I cant think of anywhere to set system-wide environment > variables which all processes will have. I've only ever done this in shell > profiles before and I cant think

Re: 5.4 not running HTT

2005-06-13 Thread Alex de Kruijff
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:06:51PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Steven Hartland wrote: > >Have a read /usr/src/UPDATING it explains. > > > > It should be in /usr/src/UPDATING, but I don't see it there myself. > > I got bitten by the same problem. The other guy who gave > ftp://ftp.fr

applying the vesa patch to stable for high console resolution

2005-06-13 Thread Didier Wiroth
Hi, USE AT YOUR OWN RISK! this for the freebsd5 branch only Here is how to apply the patch to get the "long awaited" high console text modes under freebsd! I actually use it on my nc6000 hp laptop with the following mode: 1400x1050x16 damm .. really nice ;-)) This patch is actually for

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-13 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 06/13/05 14:26, Rasmus Kaj wrote: "KK" == Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KK> And what was wrong with casting your eye one line down, clicking on KK> "Message-ID" and entering it in the search box at KK> http://www.freebsd.org/search/search-mid.html Ah, there it is. Thank yo

Re: atacontrol raid1 vs. gmirror

2005-06-13 Thread Craig Boston
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:14:03AM -0700, Jon Simola wrote: > - if they do not probe correctly, check the BIOS settings above > - perform a minimal install of FreeBSD 5.3 (do not worry about > network or anything) > - reboot from the installed OS and login as root > - Run th

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-13 Thread Rasmus Kaj
> "KK" == Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KK> And what was wrong with casting your eye one line down, clicking on KK> "Message-ID" and entering it in the search box at KK> http://www.freebsd.org/search/search-mid.html Ah, there it is. Thank you! KK> Is it really rendered i

Re: CPUTYPE for Sempron

2005-06-13 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 06/13/05 14:03, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: use CFLAGS=-march=atlhlon-xp. CPUTYPE overrides CFLAGS, so it doesn't provide You such sophisticated optimizations. If You plan to make buildworld, use: CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -march=athlon-xp Anyway, if You just use ports collection, and don't make buildworld

Re: CPUTYPE for Sempron

2005-06-13 Thread Kövesdán Gábor
Hello, use CFLAGS=-march=atlhlon-xp. CPUTYPE overrides CFLAGS, so it doesn't provide You such sophisticated optimizations. If You plan to make buildworld, use: CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -march=athlon-xp Anyway, if You just use ports collection, and don't make buildworld CFLAGS=-O3 -pipe -march=athlon-xp

CPUTYPE for Sempron

2005-06-13 Thread Mike Jakubik
Which CPUTYPE should be used for the AMD Sempron CPU? I'm assuming this is similiar to an athlon-xp. Perhaps an alias or a new entry should be created for this CPU? --- CPU: AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+ (1799.81-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x10fc0 Stepping = 0 Feature

Re: atacontrol raid1 vs. gmirror

2005-06-13 Thread Jon Simola
On 6/11/05, Paul Mather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I found array rebuilding to be troublesome on atacontrol RAID Some bits from the in-house documentation I've been writing. I've tested this on multiple occasions on my 1U Supermicro SATA boxes, so might possibly be interesting for someone.

Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux

2005-06-13 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Pete French wrote: > > Reread the above for the answer to your last question. > > Sorry, rephrased - 'How can I set that environment variable for all > processes?' login.conf perhaps? > I'm kind of embarassed to have to ask, as this should surely be very simple, > but I can

Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux

2005-06-13 Thread Pete French
> Reread the above for the answer to your last question. Sorry, rephrased - 'How can I set that environment variable for all processes?' I'm kind of embarassed to have to ask, as this should surely be very simple, but I cant think of anywhere to set system-wide environment variables which all pro

Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux

2005-06-13 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Pete French wrote: > > You can set the environment variable LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE to force > > libpthread to use system scope. This is easier than rebuilding libpthread > > (with SYSTEM_SCOPE_ONLY defined) and allows you to use M:N for some > > applications and 1:1 for othe

Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux

2005-06-13 Thread Pete French
> You can set the environment variable LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE to force > libpthread to use system scope. This is easier than rebuilding libpthread > (with SYSTEM_SCOPE_ONLY defined) and allows you to use M:N for some > applications and 1:1 for others. Is the sysctl kern.threads.thr_scope_sys sup

UPDATE panics on 5.4-RELEASE-p1

2005-06-13 Thread Philippe PEGON
Hi, I searched in the problem report database and I found an open PR which seems to be related to the same panic : kern/74319. I contacted the author of the PR and he said he has the same problem on two servers which seems to work fine with Linux : a HP Proliant ML110 and an IBM. The only worka

reboot panic kernel 5.3

2005-06-13 Thread Richard Legault
Kernel is 5.3 + Sandvine modifications I have uncovered a race condition during reboot, as the system is going down it kernel panics. This problem is reproducible on my system, it occurs approx 1 out of every 20 reboots. Stack Tr

Re: MS USB Wireless Mouse

2005-06-13 Thread Michal Vanco
Michal Vanco wrote: ... seems like reported locations X,Y,Z and buttons are wrong. well ... this works. but i'm not sure for other mices diff -Nrua usb/ums.c /sys/dev/usb/ums.c --- usb/ums.c Sun Jan 30 02:00:10 2005 +++ /sys/dev/usb/ums.c Mon Jun 13 16:24:50 2005 @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ #include

Re: Adaptec 2120S delays boot

2005-06-13 Thread Andrey Lakhno
Hello, On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Guy Helmer wrote: GH> >I have a problem with server with Adaptec SCSI RAID 2120S controller. GH> >5.4-RELEASE was installed. GH> > GH> >GENERIC kernel boots with long delay (about 10 minutes), printing GH> >following messages: GH> >aac0: Error 5 sending GetDeviceProbe

Re: Adaptec 2120S delays boot

2005-06-13 Thread Guy Helmer
Andrey Lakhno wrote: Hello, I have a problem with server with Adaptec SCSI RAID 2120S controller. 5.4-RELEASE was installed. GENERIC kernel boots with long delay (about 10 minutes), printing following messages: aac0: Error 5 sending GetDeviceProbeInfo command aac0: Error 5 sending GetDevicePr

Re: NFS on 5.4

2005-06-13 Thread Marko Cuk
Aha, ok, thanks... (31 Oct 2004) The results of netstat -m can become incorrect on SMP systems when debug.mpsafenet is set to 1 (default). This is an error in the statistics gathering because of a race condition in the counters, not an actual memory leak. I'll put kernel into debug and see,

Re: NFS on 5.4

2005-06-13 Thread Dominic Marks
On Monday 13 June 2005 13:18, Goran Gajic wrote: > Ups, I forgot: Hello Goran, If you would reply to existing messages instead of posting new threads that would be very helpful it makes browsing the mail archive, and following conversation in a threaded mail reader much easier. Also you seem t

Re: NFS on 5.4

2005-06-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:29:40AM +0200, Marko ??uk wrote: > Hello ! > > Does anyone knows, what's going on with NFS on 5.4 ? > > I have same hardware as before, when 5.3 was installed, except the > installation is new, 5.4. I have NFS mounted and some FTP app is using > it extensively and ser

Re: NFS on 5.4

2005-06-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 02:14:35PM +0200, Goran Gajic wrote: > > > I have noticed same behaviour on latest 5.4-STABLE which > has nfs mounts. I'm running squid on that machine (but both NFS > exports are on Linux-2.6.12-rc5): > > # netstat -m > 4294964710 mbufs in use > 2824/25600 mbuf clusters

MS USB Wireless Mouse

2005-06-13 Thread Michal Vanco
Hi, my problem with %subj% continues. Recently I have forced ums to detect it as mouse but there are still some weird things. ums0: Microsoft Microsoft USB Wireless Mouse, rev 2.00/0.17, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums_attach: bLength=7 bDescriptorType=5 bEndpointAddress=1-in bmAttributes=3 wMaxPacke

NFS on 5.4

2005-06-13 Thread Goran Gajic
Ups, I forgot: #vmstat -z | grep Mbuf MbufClust: 2048,25600, 4934, 0, 9085312 Mbuf:256,0, 4995,855, 199904149 Regards, gg. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf

NFS on 5.4

2005-06-13 Thread Goran Gajic
I have noticed same behaviour on latest 5.4-STABLE which has nfs mounts. I'm running squid on that machine (but both NFS exports are on Linux-2.6.12-rc5): # netstat -m 4294964710 mbufs in use 2824/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/max) 0/20/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 5001 KBytes al

kernel bug (ufs2?) on a dell 2600

2005-06-13 Thread Geoffroy Desvernay
This server (FreeBSD 5.4 RELENG) is crashing once a week or more since 5.4 (maybe before). It may be related with a full filesystem: I'm using snapshots on this server (using http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/snapshot/), and crack has occured after (~30mins) a snapshot that fills up to 100% the files

Re: NFS on 5.4

2005-06-13 Thread Max Laier
On Monday 13 June 2005 10:29, Marko Čuk wrote: > Does anyone knows, what's going on with NFS on 5.4 ? > > I have same hardware as before, when 5.3 was installed, except the > installation is new, 5.4. I have NFS mounted and some FTP app is using > it extensively and server crashes once / day. I hav

NFS on 5.4

2005-06-13 Thread Marko Čuk
Hello ! Does anyone knows, what's going on with NFS on 5.4 ? I have same hardware as before, when 5.3 was installed, except the installation is new, 5.4. I have NFS mounted and some FTP app is using it extensively and server crashes once / day. I have noticed: After 8 hours of uptime... su