In the last episode (May 09), Colin Percival said:
> Rob wrote:
> > Some time ago, there was (or still is) a similar conflict with
> > hostname resolution at bootup when using ntpd.
>
> Yes, but not with named -- the problem was only when using a dns
> cache from the ports tree, since those are st
On 5/10/05, Zoran Kolic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all!
> I'm preparing to build desktop box
> with amd64 processor and some GF3
> motherboard and ati9550 video card.
> My dealer offers "asus". Is there
> any issue with "asus" that should
> prevent me from that? Bios, incom-
> patibility wit
On 05/10/05 00:21, Billy Newsom wrote:
Jonathan Noack wrote:
> On 05/09/05 23:14, Billy Newsom wrote:
> From the fstab(5) man page:
> "The fourth field, (fs_mntops), describes the mount options associated
> with the file system. It is formatted as a comma separated list of
> options. It con
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On May 10, 2005, at 1:24 AM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > No, libc_r wraps execve() and a lot of other syscalls that libpthread
> > or libthr don't need to. Take a look at libc_r/uthread/
> > uthread_execve.c
> > and you will see it sets the s
Hi,
On May 10, 2005, at 1:24 AM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
No, libc_r wraps execve() and a lot of other syscalls that libpthread
or libthr don't need to. Take a look at libc_r/uthread/
uthread_execve.c
and you will see it sets the signal mask before exec()ing.
Couldn't we do the same thing in libpthr
Rob wrote:
> Some time ago, there was (or still is) a similar
> conflict with hostname resolution at bootup when
> using ntpd.
Yes, but not with named -- the problem was only when
using a dns cache from the ports tree, since those
are started later in the boot sequence.
Colin Percival
___
Hi,
I'm running 5-Stable as of today.
The PC is a dual-homed gateway to a local network,
a caching nameserver, httpd server, firewall etc.
In /etc/rc.conf, I have:
named_enable="YES"
apache2_enable="YES"
The nameserver works fine after bootup, so I suppose
that the named.conf is properly c
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On May 9, 2005, at 7:21 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > I don't think that patch is correct. You need the signal mask
> > in the kernel to match in case of an exec() after a fork()
> > for instance. If the application fork()'s, then chang
Jonathan Noack wrote:
> On 05/09/05 23:14, Billy Newsom wrote:
>
> From the fstab(5) man page:
> "The fourth field, (fs_mntops), describes the mount options associated
> with the file system. It is formatted as a comma separated list of
> options. It contains at least the type of mount (see fs_t
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Jonathan Noack wrote:
> On 05/09/05 18:47, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >>If the process wasn't linked to libpthread, then the longjmp()
> >>and setjmp() would still be calling the syscall, so it isn't
> >>the syscall itself that is making things slower. You'll notice
> >>that ther
Dear all!
I'm preparing to build desktop box
with amd64 processor and some GF3
motherboard and ati9550 video card.
My dealer offers "asus". Is there
any issue with "asus" that should
prevent me from that? Bios, incom-
patibility with freebsd in this
moment?
Best regards
Zoran
_
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:04:58PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
>
> The Release Engineering Team is happy to announce the availability
> of FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE, the latest release of the FreeBSD Stable
> development branch. Since FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE in November 2004 we have
> made many improvements in
On 05/09/05 23:14, Billy Newsom wrote:
Details:
* FreeBSD 5.3. Updated and compiled in mid-February. I froze it there
and may soon upgrade to 5.4, but I don't count on this fixing this issue.
* I needed to make sure I had an nfs drive mounted properly, even after
a reboot, but didn't want to
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:14:51PM -0500, Billy Newsom wrote:
> Here's something pretty stupid about either the code in mount, df, or
> both. I'm on the verge of a denial of service if this lasts much
> longer.
Why do you think so?
> When I mount an nfs device more than once, I get this
> rid
Hello,
On May 9, 2005, at 7:21 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
I don't think that patch is correct. You need the signal mask
in the kernel to match in case of an exec() after a fork()
for instance. If the application fork()'s, then changes the
signal mask in the child (which is now single threaded), th
Here's something pretty stupid about either the code in mount, df, or
both. I'm on the verge of a denial of service if this lasts much
longer. When I mount an nfs device more than once, I get this
ridiculous output from df and mount:
#df
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Avail Capacity Mounted
In the last episode (May 09), Jason C. Wells said:
> I run a homegrown script after upgrades to find outdated binaries. I have
> a bunch of files name /usr/lib/lib*_p.a that predate my recent upgrade to
> 5.4-RELEASE. What are these? Can they be deleted without harm?
Those are versions of lib
y use threads, and libpthread assumes
non-threaded processes are system scope. So, it would end up using
the sigprocmask syscall, even though it doesn't really need to.
The diff at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/testing/
thr_sigmask-20050509.diff fixes this, by making sure the process i
I run a homegrown script after upgrades to find outdated binaries. I have
a bunch of files name /usr/lib/lib*_p.a that predate my recent upgrade to
5.4-RELEASE. What are these? Can they be deleted without harm?
Thanks,
Jason C. Wells
___
freebsd-sta
I tried to install a RAID5 array using both vinum and gvinum under
5.3-RELEASE and couldn't get a reliable system running. I reinstalled
using 4.11-STABLE and so far the system (and vinum) have been error-free.
The 5.4-RELEASE documentation only mentions that "geom_vinum" provides a
GEOM compa
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have a Dell Inspiron 7500 on which I have put FreeBSD Release 5.4.
The 3Com Megahertz 574B pccard ethernet card works well with the ep
driver, except that after I run X11, it simply stops working.
I am guessing that it is an interupt conflict. I have tried every
I have a Dell Inspiron 7500 on which I have put FreeBSD Release 5.4.
The 3Com Megahertz 574B pccard ethernet card works well with the ep
driver, except that after I run X11, it simply stops working.
I am guessing that it is an interupt conflict. I have tried everything
I can think of so that sp
se threads, and libpthread assumes
> > non-threaded processes are system scope. So, it would end up using
> > the sigprocmask syscall, even though it doesn't really need to.
> > The diff at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/testing/
> > thr_sigmask-20050509.diff fixes t
Ya, this looks like it might be a problem ... server just crashed, and
fsck is once more dog slow, and I suspect its in the 'initialization mode'
again ...
Looking at the following that I've also found, things appear to be
pointing to ACPI as the 'trigger' ... does anyone else have any
experie
, even though it doesn't really need to.
> The diff at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/testing/
> thr_sigmask-20050509.diff fixes this, by making sure the process is
> threaded, before using the syscall.
I don't think that patch is correct. You need the signal mask
in the k
On 5/8/2005 10:57 PM, Jonathan Noack wrote:
On 05/08/05 14:29, David Gurvich wrote:
cdrom /boot/loader from 5.3 has no problem. However, after updating
world from kernel, /boot/loader is replaced with cvs version. This
one goes into endless cycle of reboots. When replaced with
/boot/loader fr
ting point operations. The
python script does not actually use threads, and libpthread assumes
non-threaded processes are system scope. So, it would end up using
the sigprocmask syscall, even though it doesn't really need to.
The diff at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/testing/
thr_sig
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 23:04 schrieb Ken Smith:
> The Release Engineering Team is happy to announce the availability
> of FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE, the latest release of the FreeBSD Stable
> development branch. Since FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE in November 2004 we have
> made many improvements in functionality
On 5/9/2005 1:30 PM, Jonathan Noack wrote:
On 5/9/2005 12:31 PM, Pete French wrote:
5.3 ships with SMP turned on, which makes lock operations rather
expensive on single-processor machines. 4.x does not have SMP
turned on by default. Would you be able to re-run your test with
SMP turned off?
I ju
The Release Engineering Team is happy to announce the availability
of FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE, the latest release of the FreeBSD Stable
development branch. Since FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE in November 2004 we have
made many improvements in functionality, stability, performance, and device
driver support for
I'm building a usb harddrive and i'll be using it under both linux and
FreeBSD. vfat is not a contender due to a 2gb limit of file size (I'm
using it as a dump disk and I don't want to deal with multiple
volumes). It seems that BSD can talk to ext2 partitions and Linux can
talk to the older U
Daniel Eischen wrote:
> {sig}setjmp(), {sig}longjmp(),
A very wild guess.. python is using setjmp/longjmp to implement
continuations, tailcalls, or any mechanism similar to that and using
that in a loop?
mkb.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailin
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-May-09 11:00:18 -0400, Ewan Todd wrote:
> >I have what I think is a serious performance issue with fbsd 5.3
> >release. I've read about threading issues, and it seems to me that
> >that is what I'm looking at, but I'm not confident enough to
On Mon, 2005-May-09 11:00:18 -0400, Ewan Todd wrote:
>I have what I think is a serious performance issue with fbsd 5.3
>release. I've read about threading issues, and it seems to me that
>that is what I'm looking at, but I'm not confident enough to rule out
>that it might be a hardware issue, a ke
On 5/9/2005 12:31 PM, Pete French wrote:
5.3 ships with SMP turned on, which makes lock operations rather
expensive on single-processor machines. 4.x does not have SMP
turned on by default. Would you be able to re-run your test with
SMP turned off?
I just ran a test here with SMP turned of on 5
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, I wrote:
> Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode
> instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc05e8ca2
> stack pointer = 0x10:0xc7499d10
> frame pointer = 0x10:0xc7499d10
> code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I ran ktrace(1) on it, and it appears that python keeps calling
> sigprocmask() continually:
>
> 673 python 0.07 CALL sigprocmask(0x3,0,0x811d11c)
> 673 python 0.05 RET sigprocmask 0
> 673 python 0.09 CALL
On Mon, May 9, 2005 1:06 pm, Scott Long said:
> 5.3 ships with SMP turned on, which makes lock operations rather
> expensive on single-processor machines. 4.x does not have SMP turned on by
> default. Would you be able to re-run your test with SMP turned off?
This is what i get on my system, wh
Hello,
On May 9, 2005, at 1:31 PM, Pete French wrote:
5.3 ships with SMP turned on, which makes lock operations rather
expensive on single-processor machines. 4.x does not have SMP
turned on by default. Would you be able to re-run your test with
SMP turned off?
I just ran a test here with SMP tur
Scott Long wrote:
> First of all, make sure that you have WITNESS and INVARIANTS off in your
> kernel. You might also want to recompile your kernel with the SMP
> option turned off.
I can confirm this.
I just rerun it on RELENG_5_4 as of yesterday and got
136.52 real80.29 user
> 5.3 ships with SMP turned on, which makes lock operations rather
> expensive on single-processor machines. 4.x does not have SMP
> turned on by default. Would you be able to re-run your test with
> SMP turned off?
I just ran a test here with SMP turned of on 5.4-RC4 (GENERIC) I got the
follow
Ewan Todd wrote:
5.3 ships with SMP turned on, which makes lock operations rather
expensive on single-processor machines. 4.x does not have SMP
turned on by default. Would you be able to re-run your test with
SMP turned off?
I'm pretty sure there's no SMP in this kernel.
#cd /usr/src/sys/i38
>
> 5.3 ships with SMP turned on, which makes lock operations rather
> expensive on single-processor machines. 4.x does not have SMP
> turned on by default. Would you be able to re-run your test with
> SMP turned off?
>
I'm pretty sure there's no SMP in this kernel.
#cd /usr/src/sys/i386/c
Ewan Todd wrote:
Whereas, the typical result for the new rig looked more like
105.36 real71.10 user33.41 sys
...
10548 involuntary context switches
First of all, make sure that you have WITNESS and INVARIANTS off in your
kernel. You might also want to recompile your ker
> >
> >Whereas, the typical result for the new rig looked more like
> >
> > 105.36 real71.10 user33.41 sys
> > ...
> > 10548 involuntary context switches
> >
> >
>
> First of all, make sure that you have WITNESS and INVARIANTS off in your
> kernel. You might also wan
Same test on a 5.3-STABLE from 31.01.2005:
81,90 real77,05 user 3,51 sys
22908 maximum resident set size
620 average shared memory size
20083 average unshared data size
128 average unshared stack size
5379 page reclaims
26 page fau
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:29:19PM +0200, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
> The same troubles I got on FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE. Any tips and
> advices ? Thanks.
Try using driver from http://www.opensound.com/
-ip
--
Never tell them what you wouldn't do.
___
fre
> Whereas, the typical result for the new rig looked more like
>
> 105.36 real71.10 user33.41 sys
...
> 10548 involuntary context switches
Now I just ran this test myself. This machine is a 2.4 gig P4 with
hyperthreading enabled. Much as I am an AMD fan, I would expect
At 11:00 AM 09/05/2005, Ewan Todd wrote:
Here's the background. I just got a new (to me) AMD machine and put
5.3 release on it. I'd been very happy with the way my old Intel
There have been quite a few changes since 5.3. If you are starting fresh, I
would strongly recommend going to 5.4 RC4. The
Hi!
The problem is still here for 5.4-STABLE.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/56558
Eugene Grosbein
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[E
At 05:22 PM 07/05/2005, Alexander S. Usov wrote:
Hi!
It looks that somewhere recently something was broken
in ehci again. Trying to write something to msdosfs/ext3fs
mounted from external usb2 drive blocks quite qickly.
Writing process gets stuck in wdrain state, and disk seems
unresponsive -- it j
Hi!
The problem is still here for 4.11-STABLE and 5.4-STABLE:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/61355
Eugene Grosbein
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
Ewan Todd wrote:
Hi All,
I have what I think is a serious performance issue with fbsd 5.3
release. I've read about threading issues, and it seems to me that
that is what I'm looking at, but I'm not confident enough to rule out
that it might be a hardware issue, a kernel configuration issue, or
som
Hello,
I was trying to connect a FreeBSD box with an integrated realtek network card
to a hub but the re driver is unable to set the card in half-duplex:
# ifconfig re0 inet 10.20.30.40 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1492 media
10baseT/UTP mediaopt half-duplex up
ifconfig: SIOCSIFMEDIA (mediaopt): Dev
Hi All,
I have what I think is a serious performance issue with fbsd 5.3
release. I've read about threading issues, and it seems to me that
that is what I'm looking at, but I'm not confident enough to rule out
that it might be a hardware issue, a kernel configuration issue, or
something to do wi
I have an older laptop (AMS TravelTech w/ K6-3+/333) and a Microsoft MN-520
WLAN adapter. I want to put FreeBSD on it, but I'm having a lot of trouble
with the card not being recognized after the infamous errors:
CIS is too long -- truncating
pccard0: Card has no functions!
cbb0: PC
Hi!
The problem is still here for 5.4-STABLE:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/64198
Eugene Grosbein
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[E
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 03:41:38PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> forwarding to freebsd-stable (probably the right place anyway),
> since I got no further responses on freebsd-questions.
>
> Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 5/5/2005 19:43, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > >the day b
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Originator:Eugene Grosbein
>Organization: Svyaz Service JSC
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: ACPI(pci_link) problem in 5.4-STABLE: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA
>retrying
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: kern
>Class: sw-bug
>Rele
Hi Gavin,
sorry, took some time to test it, but we're currently very busy moving
services to the new machines.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:06:38PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> Sorry - even with that patch, I suspect you'll have to either run top with
> the -u option, or define RANDOM_PW before
Hi Soeren,
I have to thank you for the work you put in the ata driver.
After patching the 5.4 sources with the new ata mkIII
(http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ATA)
I am able to use the RAID 1 with my Adaptec SATA 1210SA.
The dmesg (the Adaptec is recognized as Sil 3112 SATA150):
FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #
Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ack. I just noticed that 'pentiumpro' is also mis-spelled 'penitumpro' as
> well... PR time, I think.
No, that was fixed two months ago (rev 1.261)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-
62 matches
Mail list logo
