> Eirik Øverby writes:
> > [...]
> > What can I expect to see when trying nullfs and/or unionfs today? Has
> > anything changed? Do I have even a remote chance of making it work - and if
> > it doesn't work, what are my chances of anyone having time or energy to
> look
> > into it? I'm an adm
> Do you happen to still have the 1198_firmware_ND-1300A_WIN108.zip file? I
> have not been able to find this and I think this is what I need.
not sure what your question is doing here, but the answer is probably:
http://forum.rpc1.org/dl_firmware.php?download_id=1517
many firmwares for that
Do you happen to still have the 1198_firmware_ND-1300A_WIN108.zip file? I
have not been able to find this and I think this is what I need.
I can burn Music files and CD to CD, but when I go to burn a DVD or movie
file, it won't.
I am grateful if you can help me!
Thanks,
Patti
__
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
I'm not using 5.4 but I would look in the save-entropy script for a
line that starts with 'X '. Also, looking at the source, have a look
at /etc/rc.conf and/or /etc/defaults/rc.conf as they are read at the
beginning of that script.
Actually, I can reproduce such message by
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> Can anybody indicate to me what is causing the attached email and how to
> fix it? I upgraded to the 5.4-STABLE as of yesterday and I am now
> getting the attached email several time a day. Is this simply a script
> error?
[snip]
> Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /usr/libe
Can anybody indicate to me what is causing the attached email and how to
fix it? I upgraded to the 5.4-STABLE as of yesterday and I am now
getting the attached email several time a day. Is this simply a script
error?
Thanks,
Tom Veldhouse
--- Begin Message ---
X: not found
--- End Message ---
When looking through the example make.conf, I saw that 'nocona' is listed
under "AMD CPUs" (under "Intel x86 architecture") as well as under "AMD64
architecture".
I can understand listing nocona under AMD64 architecture, but isn't it an
Intel CPU? Am I missing something in thinking it should be l
Eirik Øverby writes:
> [...]
> What can I expect to see when trying nullfs and/or unionfs today? Has
> anything changed? Do I have even a remote chance of making it work - and if
> it doesn't work, what are my chances of anyone having time or energy to look
> into it? I'm an admin only, no cod
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Eirik [ISO-8859-1] Øverby wrote:
The solution, or at least parts of it, would be to have certain parts of
the jail filesystems mounted in via nullfs (acceptable solution) or
unionfs (ideal solution). However, ever since FreeBSD 4.10 this has been
a major problem, as both file
Am Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2005 14:06 schrieb Eirik Øverby:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm struggling with some hosting environments where I am managing a
> large number of jails (>100) spread over about a dozen servers. I am
> starting to see disk space as a real problem, especially given that each
> physical box n
Eirik Ø verby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before I start playing with this again, I'd like to know if any work
has been done on either of these in 5.x. Specifically, I'm currently
running
5.3-p6 or newer on all the systems, and as of yesterday I've been
using
5.4-prerelease (cvsup) on a couple of te
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 14:06 +0200, Eirik =?ISO-8859-1?B?2A==?=verby
wrote:
> [...] The solution, or at least parts of it, would be to have certain parts
> of the
> jail filesystems mounted in via nullfs (acceptable solution) or unionfs
> (ideal solution). However, ever since FreeBSD 4.10 this has
Hi all,
I'm struggling with some hosting environments where I am managing a large
number of jails (>100) spread over about a dozen servers. I am starting to
see disk space as a real problem, especially given that each physical box
needs to be autonomous - i.e. I can't rely on any external storage,
Hi Brooks,
> - Using these drivers to connect to a real, production FDDI network
> - Are running FreeBSD 5.3+ or will be in the near future
Well, I use fpa(4) as a crosslink between my two boxes. Not really
production-wise, but I do enjoy the fact that they can be dual-attached.
Which is why I
14 matches
Mail list logo
