Palle Girgensohn wrote:
No, but the machine crashes a lot, sometimes a couple of times in a
day (oddly mostly on week-ends, and sometimes it can be stable for a
week or two). I'm clueless to what's causing it, but suspect that the
amd64 stuff is broken, at least for this machine (dual Xeon). I w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:52:59AM +, Iain Dooley wrote:
>
>
> >
>
> maybe i'll hold off for a little while. it's such a pain having to wait for
> everything to build from source. kde takes forever, so you leave the house
> but when you come b
I have just installed FreeBSD on my newly acquired (if
abysmally old) Toshiba Tecra 520CDT. I compiled a
kernel using the old 'card' and 'pcic' modules and the
kernel detects my PCMCIA slot hardware. Pccardd ran
fine, and detected the ethernet NIC I inserted, but
failed to allocate an IRQ for the
--- Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:39, Rob wrote:
> > Nevertheless, I have tried your advice, but to
> > no avail.
>
> Hmm, try this diff it kldload's random if it's not
> present.
It's not present on 5.4-Stable, so I have patched it.
In /etc/rc.d/sshd I also
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:52:59AM +, Iain Dooley wrote:
> >you're going to keep using new ports/packages then it's recommended
> >that you reinstall everything (e.g. with portupgrade) to avoid the
> >incompatibilities that can arise if you mix and match 4.x and 5.x
> >packages.
>
> i see, i'
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:40:19AM +, Iain Dooley wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:23:05AM +, Iain Dooley wrote:
hi all, i keep seeing comments such as "upgrading across major versions
is not recommended for mere mortals". so what the hell are '
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:40:19AM +, Iain Dooley wrote:
>
>
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:23:05AM +, Iain Dooley wrote:
> >
> >>hi all, i keep seeing comments such as "upgrading across major versions
> >>is not recommended for mere mortals". so what the hell are '
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:23:05AM +, Iain Dooley wrote:
hi all, i keep seeing comments such as "upgrading across major versions is
not recommended for mere mortals". so what the hell are 'mere mortals' such
as myself supposed to do when we want to upgrade across major v
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:23:05AM +, Iain Dooley wrote:
> hi all, i keep seeing comments such as "upgrading across major versions is
> not recommended for mere mortals". so what the hell are 'mere mortals' such
> as myself supposed to do when we want to upgrade across major versions?
Use sy
hi all, i keep seeing comments such as "upgrading across major versions is not
recommended for mere mortals". so what the hell are 'mere mortals' such as myself
supposed to do when we want to upgrade across major versions?
cheers
iain
___
freebsd-stable
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:39, Rob wrote:
> Nevertheless, I have tried your advice, but to
> no avail.
Hmm, try this diff it kldload's random if it's not present.
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that t
Someone just helped me through a bridging problem I was having, and I
thought I'd throw the problem out to the list to see if it's a bug, or at
least, for archival purposes.
I have a machine that I'm using as a workstation, that I would also like to
use to bridge a home LAN. It has two interfaces
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Whether or not its algoritms are correct or the VM and VFS layers
>properly support it, modern IDE write caches pretty much make write
>orderings a crapshoot.
Well.. that can be countered somewhat by using a UPS for servers, or in
areas where power is flake
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
not always be clean. Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be
consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and
Why "hopefully"? Aren't people convinced that it works correctly?
mkb.
Whether or not its algoritms are correct or th
--On söndag, april 24, 2005 08.11.06 -0600 Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Hi!
on a 5.4-prerelease machine (dell 2850 dual cpu, running amd64), I have
this in rc.conf:
fsck_y_enable="YES"
background_fsck="NO"
Still, I'm not certain that fsck is really run at startup
--On söndag, april 24, 2005 11.25.31 -0700 Kris Kennaway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 01:45:47PM +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
...
BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS
SALVAGE? no
Running fsck on a mounted filesystem will do this unless you use
background fsck, because the filesyste
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 01:45:47PM +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> Hi!
>
> on a 5.4-prerelease machine (dell 2850 dual cpu, running amd64), I have
> this in rc.conf:
>
> fsck_y_enable="YES"
> background_fsck="NO"
>
>
> Still, I'm not certain that fsck is really run at startup. At least,
> ru
TB --- 2005-04-24 15:33:07 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2005-04-24 15:33:08 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2005-04-24 15:33:08 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2005-04-24 15:33:08 - cd /home/tinderbox/RELENG_5/i386/i386
TB --- 2005-04-24 1
TB --- 2005-04-24 14:13:04 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2005-04-24 14:13:04 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2005-04-24 14:13:04 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2005-04-24 14:13:04 - cd /home/tinderbox/RELENG_5/amd64/amd64
TB --- 2005-04-
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:39, Rob wrote:
> > That gets it called here (although I already had
> > random.ko loaded so I'm not 100% sure it worked)
>
> Oh? There's no such 'random_enable' entry in
> /etc/defaults/rc.conf on my 5.4-Stable system.
> Is this a Current only thing?
> Moreover, on my system
Scott Long wrote:
> not always be clean. Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be
> consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and
Why "hopefully"? Aren't people convinced that it works correctly?
mkb.
___
freebsd-stable@f
TB --- 2005-04-24 13:04:11 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2005-04-24 13:04:11 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2005-04-24 13:04:11 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2005-04-24 13:04:11 - cd /home/tinderbox/RELENG_5/alpha/alpha
TB --- 2005-04-
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Hi!
on a 5.4-prerelease machine (dell 2850 dual cpu, running amd64), I have
this in rc.conf:
fsck_y_enable="YES"
background_fsck="NO"
Still, I'm not certain that fsck is really run at startup.
Are you expecting a fsck to be run at every startup, regardless of
whether the f
On 4/23/05, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 06:34:39AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-Apr-21 22:04:01 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >I'm getting this on a RELENG_5_4 sparc64 system (e4500):
> > >
> > ># rm -rf *
> > >/bin/rm: Unknown error: 7283.
>
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Michael A. Koerber wrote:
1. Currently FreeBSD (or any other BSD) doesn't seem to be on the list
of approved OS's for classified processing. I'm trying to obtain at
least local approval, but I don't speak the "security language" too
well. Any help would be greatly appreci
Hi!
on a 5.4-prerelease machine (dell 2850 dual cpu, running amd64), I have
this in rc.conf:
fsck_y_enable="YES"
background_fsck="NO"
Still, I'm not certain that fsck is really run at startup. At least,
running fsck on in multiuser reveals information like below, but perhaps
that is normal for
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:21:53 +0200
"O. Hartmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a way getting various handbook's sources via cvsup,
> common handbook English/German and some developers handbooks
> (developer, porter).
>
> On each nstallation CD I can find various handbook types
I'm looking for a way getting various handbook's sources via cvsup,
common handbook English/German and some developers handbooks
(developer, porter).
On each nstallation CD I can find various handbook types (PS, PDF,
HTML). My intention is having a local webserver at the department
keeping t
Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Michael Lestinsky wrote:
>> Is anyone here sucessfully using some external DVD-Ram capable writer?
> ...
>
> Currently the USB2 code in RELENG_5 seems more stable than the Firewire code.
My latest test here see
--- Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:16, Rob wrote:
> > Either I don't understand this, or it is not
> > working
> > properly.
> >
> > I am using 5-Stable, not Current, so the
> 'cleanvar'
> > is not there. So in /etc/rc.d/sshd I have this
> > line:
> >
> >#
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:16, Rob wrote:
> Either I don't understand this, or it is not working
> properly.
>
> I am using 5-Stable, not Current, so the 'cleanvar'
> is not there. So in /etc/rc.d/sshd I have this line:
>
># REQUIRE: LOGIN random
>
> I then do:
>
> /etc/rc.d/random stop
> /etc/
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 02:04:29AM +0200, Raphael H. Becker wrote:
> The NEC uPD 720100 USB 2.0 controller doesn's seem to work. This
> controller is on a "Longshine LCS-8033H PCI USB Card" and is a
> low cost "standard-USB2-controller" at my local electronics store.
I wrote here about two wee
32 matches
Mail list logo
