Hi,
> Does 5-STABLE have a working acpi based suspend/resume for anyone?
I have a 5-STABLE from 27.01, on an IBM R40e. Suspend to memory (-s 3)
seems to work, but there is no way to resume.
How do you trigger a resume??
CU,
Vlad
___
freebsd-stable@fre
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.diff-releng5.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.diff-current.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.tar.gz
sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c rev 1.235 conflicts, could you please update the
Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.diff-releng5.gz
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.diff-current.gz
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.tar.gz
sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c rev 1.235 conflicts, could you please update the
-CURRENT patch?
DES
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, dima wrote:
> I am preparing a new server for production use.
> It contains 2 1000BaseTX NICs and 2 SCSI controllers.
> The interrupt assignment performed by ACPI looks kinda strange:
> irq24: bge0 ahd0
> irq25: bge1 ahd1
> How can I affect it? I mean I want all the devices use
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I mounted a write-pretected floppy on 5-STABLE and now I'm not able to
> unmount the floppy
For the record I can reproduce this. There is #ifdef notyet'd code in fdc
that would avoid this case. I'm hoping phk can explain what changes are
stil
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:40:48PM -0200, T?rgan Flores de Siqueira wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:01:49PM +, Chris wrote:
> >
> >>4 - compatiblity, I remember using 5.2.1 and pretty much all software
> >>worked well in that and then they did the bind defaulting to base and
> >>libs versi
On February 7, 2005 03:40 pm, Tórgan Flores de Siqueira wrote:
> Just adding a note: I regularly use FreeBSD on a Toshiba notebook,
> and switched from 4.x to 5.x to benefit from cardbus support.
> Well, I started with 5.2.1 and all things did well. Since then, I'm
> trying to track 5-STABLE with n
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:01:49PM +, Chris wrote:
4 - compatiblity, I remember using 5.2.1 and pretty much all software
worked well in that and then they did the bind defaulting to base and
libs version jump, why wasnt this done in 5.0 so 3rd party apps could
adjust, now we have a situation wh
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-02-03 22:16:58 +:
> have a look at this compiling a eggdrop had the same with some other
> apps as well.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] eggdrop1.6.17 # make config
> make: Permission denied
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] eggdrop1.6.17 # make config
> make: Permission denied
> [EMAIL PRO
> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:17:16 -0500
> From: David Scheidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> George Hartzell wrote:
>
> > I haven't had time to upgrade (cobbler's kids, no shoes, etc...) but
> > it's on my list of things to do.
> >
> > Does 5.3 Release have a working acpi ba
George Hartzell wrote:
I haven't had time to upgrade (cobbler's kids, no shoes, etc...) but
it's on my list of things to do.
Does 5.3 Release have a working acpi based suspend/resume for anyone?
Does 5-STABLE have a working acpi based suspend/resume for anyone?
Suspend to memory works on my T42 on
José M. Fandiño wrote:
Jon Noack wrote:
Finally, I found the culprit:
CFLAGS="" \ 100% of the transmited traffic is received
COPTFLAGS="" /
CFLAGS= -pipe \ 50% of the transmited traffic is received
COPTFLAGS= -pipe /
>>> That would be exceedingly strange, because the above two opt
Hello,
again I got a panic with PF when debug.mpsafenet is enabled, when set to 0 the
machine runs almost fine, except that 'pfctl -F all -f /etc/pf.conf' panics
and "block return" and "block return-icmp(3,13)" doesn't work.
Here's the trace:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
faul
Søren Schmidt writes:
> [...]
> Find such a machine might be very hard, if not plain impossible :/
> I already have 3 laptops here (of which none has worked for several
> month regarding suspend/resume) so I have plenty. [...]
How bad is the acpi suspend/resume situation.
I have 5.3-BETA4 on
José M. Fandiño wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote:
"Jos? M. Fandi?o" wrote:
Chris wrote:
Have tested on 3 boxes.
yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't
believe it but it happens. I ever thought it would be possible.
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:30:43AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote:
> > > "Jos? M. Fandi?o" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Chris wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Have tested on 3 boxes.
> > > >
> > > > yes, it's the int
Sorry to be a BOFH, but could you guys stop crossposting on this topic? I
think -current is more suitable for this.
Thanks.
* Hides in corner *
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To uns
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc056cc3c
stack pointer = 0x10:0xcc706918
frame pointer = 0x10:0xcc70693c
code segment= base 0x0, l
Am Montag, 7. Februar 2005 17:32 schrieb Emanuel Strobl:
> Am Montag, 7. Februar 2005 16:52 schrieb Emanuel Strobl:
> > Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2005 18:24 schrieb Max Laier:
> > > On Saturday 08 January 2005 17:52, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > > > >
I am preparing a new server for production use.
It contains 2 1000BaseTX NICs and 2 SCSI controllers.
The interrupt assignment performed by ACPI looks kinda strange:
irq24: bge0 ahd0
irq25: bge1 ahd1
How can I affect it? I mean I want all the devices use different IRQ lines.
_
Am Montag, 7. Februar 2005 16:52 schrieb Emanuel Strobl:
> Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2005 18:24 schrieb Max Laier:
> > On Saturday 08 January 2005 17:52, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > > > my machine hard locks with the attached ruleset. If I set
> > > >
Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2005 18:24 schrieb Max Laier:
> On Saturday 08 January 2005 17:52, Robert Watson wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > > my machine hard locks with the attached ruleset. If I set
> > > debug.mpsafenet to 0 everything is fine. This was a wild guess from
Randy Bush wrote:
Since I cannot debug this, I have no way of finding out whats wrong.
I will look at it when ACPI allows me to use suspend/resume again, until
then I'll concentrated on things that I can work on...
where's my refund? :-)
more seriously, shall we do a fund to get you a laptoy on
> Since I cannot debug this, I have no way of finding out whats wrong.
> I will look at it when ACPI allows me to use suspend/resume again, until
> then I'll concentrated on things that I can work on...
where's my refund? :-)
more seriously, shall we do a fund to get you a laptoy on which
acpi
Randy Bush wrote:
diff -u -r1.20 ata-all.c
--- ata-all.c 2005/02/03 17:02:31 1.20
+++ ata-all.c 2005/02/07 14:27:57
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@
void
ata_udelay(int interval)
{
-if (1 || interval < (100/hz) || ata_delayed_attach)
+if (interval < (100/hz) || ata_delayed_attach)
> diff -u -r1.20 ata-all.c
> --- ata-all.c 2005/02/03 17:02:31 1.20
> +++ ata-all.c 2005/02/07 14:27:57
> @@ -630,7 +630,7 @@
> void
> ata_udelay(int interval)
> {
> -if (1 || interval < (100/hz) || ata_delayed_attach)
> +if (interval < (100/hz) || ata_delayed_attach)
>
Arne Schwabe wrote:
SÃren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Randy Bush wrote:
After suspend, my ThinkPad X40 now hangs with following logs (copied
by hand):
Hmm, do you have ATA compiled in or as modules. I could easily
imagine that modules could have problems, but as "built in" nothing
really c
SÃren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Randy Bush wrote:
After suspend, my ThinkPad X40 now hangs with following logs (copied
by hand):
>>>
>>> Hmm, do you have ATA compiled in or as modules. I could easily
>>> imagine that modules could have problems, but as "built in" nothing
>>> re
>> my patched t41, current with ata in the kernel, locks up with disk
>> light on solid on resume.
> Does it work with stock ATA ?
it did last week, before i rebuilt with patch
> I cant work on suspend/resume as it has been broken due to ACPI
> brokenness since september last year on all my lapt
Randy Bush wrote:
After suspend, my ThinkPad X40 now hangs with following logs (copied
by hand):
Hmm, do you have ATA compiled in or as modules. I could easily imagine
that modules could have problems, but as "built in" nothing really
changed...
my patched t41, current with ata in the kernel, loc
>> After suspend, my ThinkPad X40 now hangs with following logs (copied
>> by hand):
> Hmm, do you have ATA compiled in or as modules. I could easily imagine
> that modules could have problems, but as "built in" nothing really
> changed...
my patched t41, current with ata in the kernel, locks up
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote:
> > "Jos? M. Fandi?o" wrote:
> > >
> > > Chris wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Have tested on 3 boxes.
> > >
> > > yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't
> > > believe it but it happens. I ever
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote:
> "Jos? M. Fandi?o" wrote:
> >
> > Chris wrote:
> > >
> > > Have tested on 3 boxes.
> >
> > yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't
> > believe it but it happens. I ever thought it would be possible.
>
> Fina
"José M. Fandiño" wrote:
>
> Chris wrote:
> >
> > Have tested on 3 boxes.
>
> yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't
> believe it but it happens. I ever thought it would be possible.
Finally, I found the culprit:
CFLAGS="" \ 100% of the transmited traffic is receive
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:00:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> FreeBSD Tinderbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > TB --- 2005-02-06 15:45:26 - tinderbox 2.3 running on dwp.des.no
>
> Ack! This was a test run, I didn't intend for mail to go out but
> forgot to change the rc file.
It's okay
FreeBSD Tinderbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> TB --- 2005-02-06 15:45:26 - tinderbox 2.3 running on dwp.des.no
Ack! This was a test run, I didn't intend for mail to go out but
forgot to change the rc file.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
36 matches
Mail list logo
