At 4:51 PM + 1/23/05, Robert Watson wrote:
The ps list is a bit boring, but the primary interesting thing is
that it looks like the close was going on in one thread just about
when the sio swi was scheduled to run also:
[...]
This in turn suggests that something has called ttyrel/tty_close
> The TX threshold messages issued by the dc driver appear more as an
> indication that the PCI bus is under severe load, than as a hint that
> the dc driver is causing the reboots, IMHO.
I've also seen them when the card is a CardBus card, which may
indicate some slightly pessimal performance par
On Mon, 2005-Jan-24 00:27:38 +0100, Stefan Eßer wrote:
>The TX threshold messages issued by the dc driver appear more as an
>indication that the PCI bus is under severe load, than as a hint that
>the dc driver is causing the reboots, IMHO.
Under Tru64, I've seen Tulip cards report backoff to 1024
Hello Stefan (and everyone else!),
Thank you for your great comments! I think I have a 3c9xx card around
here somewhere, I will give that a shot when it reboots the next time
(just to see). It looks like for future systems I'll standardize on the
Intel fxp-based cards, I really appreciate that a
On 2005-01-23 05:57 -0800, Net Virtual Mailing Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My latest problem is with a:
>
> dc0: port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xe608-
> 0xe60803ff irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci0
> dc0: Ethernet address: 00:0c:41:ed:ae:85
>
> ... after several hours of *HEAVY* (I'm probably u
> You know, I don't really care what NIC I use - I really don't. I'm not
> so much interested in trying to figure out why this NIC is giving me
> grief as much as I am in finding one that will work. I would just like
> someone somewhere to tell me what is a stable NIC to use for FreeBSD,
As seve
Net Virtual Mailing Lists wrote:
[ ... ]
[ ... ] It would be nice if somewhere there was
some statement of a "fact" that NIC is known to work well with
FreeBSD. I'm aware of all of the FUD out there, about people beating
their chests saying how wonderful NIC-A is or NIC-B is, and I've tried
On Sun, 2005-Jan-23 05:57:53 -0800, Net Virtual Mailing Lists wrote:
> It would be nice if somewhere there was
>some statement of a "fact" that NIC is known to work well with
>FreeBSD.
I recall seeing quite a few such statements about different cards over
the years. In general, such stateme
That post about lookups reminds me; the one 5.x box I'm running at work,
refuses to deliver it's log files to our mail hub. I know that there are
about a million different ways for me to have stuffed this up myself, so
please be gentle.
That other post reminds me about this because we have
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> --On Sunday, January 23, 2005 7:22 AM -0500 Matt Herzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm confused about how and why modules are built and (seemingly
> > loaded without my having specified any to load) when I have not
> > told my kernel conf fil
--On Sunday, January 23, 2005 7:22 AM -0500 Matt Herzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm confused about how and why modules are built and (seemingly
loaded without my having specified any to load) when I have not
told my kernel conf file to build anything as a module. As a former
NetBSD user, I had
Ran into the following panic on a 5-STABLE box this morning, which
occurred after hitting Ctrl-D to close a login session on a serial console
(ttyd0 at 9600 bps):
login: Jan 23 10:43:27 fledge login: 2 LOGIN FAILURES ON ttyd0
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address
Hello,
I regret that I have never posted to this list before, despite the fact I
have been using FreeBSD in one form or another for many years now (since
2.x era). I'm a bit cranky, so please do not take any of this wrong. I
have a system running FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE (bites tongue).
In any even
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 07:22:20AM -0500, Matt Herzog wrote:
> Can anyone point me to a loader.conf file that's full of a wide
> range of options? I just want to see some syntax for stuff like
> video hardware acceleration, audio chipset support etc.
>
Try /boot/defaults/loader.conf and loader.conf
I recently took my primary hdd running FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE out of my main
machine leaving my 2ndry hdd in the machine and installing FreeBSD5.3-STABLE
on it to use as the new primary. When everything was done and i plugged in
the 2nd hdd that originally had 4.11-STABLE on it, i was unable to fi
Can anyone point me to a loader.conf file that's full of a wide
range of options? I just want to see some syntax for stuff like
video hardware acceleration, audio chipset support etc.
I'm confused about how and why modules are built and (seemingly
loaded without my having specified any to load) wh
16 matches
Mail list logo
