On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Doug White wrote:
#7 0xe93a0018 in ?? ()
#8 0xc0580010 in kvprintf (fmt=0xc7b04c60 "?6w?\v6t?\v6t?", func=0x59,
arg=0xe93ad9bc, radix=-1067875706, ap=0xc3839674 "\001")
at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_prf.c:643
#9 0xc058940a in selwakeuppri (sip=0x0, pri=0)
at /usr/
Ok thanks yes I have the C column (happy)
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
466 root80 229M 25168K nanslp 0 9:57 0.00% 0.00% java
797 root80 229M 25168K nanslp 0 1:45 0.00% 0.00% java
800 root80 229M
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Michael Meltzer wrote:
> The new 3ware twa drive does not seem to work after the 2005-01-11
> 03:00:49 UTC RELENG_5 commit. Basically the device da is not visible
> to complete the boot and the system stopped asking for the root path (if
> their was an error message it scroll
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Tony Byrne wrote:
> Basically, after some amount of uptime the kernel will emit a "amr0:
> Bad slot x completed" message and pretty soon after this the box goes into a
> partially unresponsive state forcing us to reboot it. So far the only
> thing triggering the problem is th
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2005.01.08 19:39:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:33:14PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > +> I'm not really sure it is expected that you can do that when being in
> > +> the operator group.
> >
> > Yes. If you w
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Aron Stansvik wrote:
> I've been struggling with a dual boot setup for the best part of two
> days here, and I'm not going to go outline the hazzles I've been
> through. This is where I am now:
Note that boot0 will happily coexist with XP, so you may want to use that
option in
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Mitch Parks wrote:
> It seems both my test and production boxes are not stable with 5.3-Release.
> I'm hoping for some insight in how to make at least the production box
> not crash.
[...]
> #7 0xe93a0018 in ?? ()
> #8 0xc0580010 in kvprintf (fmt=0xc7b04c60 "?6w?\v6t?\v6t?"
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Warren wrote:
> Im having a bit of difficulty in getting sound to work, due to the fact i have
> On-Board Sound as well as a Sound Card (PCI) .. im wanting to use both but
> being a lil new im unsure of hwo to procedd, could someone please point me in
> the right direction ?
W
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> trying to import foomatic-rip, I found great changes under /dev/fd/
> going from RELENG_4 to RELENG_5.
>
> Seems that /dev/fd/3 is used by several pipe construct like foomatic-rip
> to get a free backwards error channel.
>
> Digging a bit, I fo
At 05:51 PM 13/01/2005, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
On Wed, 12.01.2005 at 17:38:56 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I did a buildworld /buildkernel with a RELENG_5 box using the following
> flags
>
>
> CPUTYPE=i686
> KERNCONF=recycle
> CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe
> COPTFLAGS=-O2 -pipe
> NO_MODULES=true# do not bui
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
CPUTYPE=i686
KERNCONF=recycle
CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe
COPTFLAGS=-O2 -pipe
NO_MODULES=true# do not build modules with the kernel
MODULES_WITH_WORLD=true # do not build modules when building kernel
I'm using -Os -pipe ever since installing 5.x after the gcc update.
Haven't encoun
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I have a dual athlon mp system running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2, I
> have wondered if both cpu's should show in top.
>
> Here is a snapshot of my top output.
>
> last pid: 15520; load averages: 0.28, 0.09, 0.03up 7+23:21:08
> 23:05:33
> 153 p
Just curious if anybody still has a copy of the last patchset for
net80211+atheros for FreeBSD 5.3 still available. It came out after
August 2004, and is no longer available through
people.freebsd.org/~sam. The notable feature of this patchset was that
it included a "doit" file that listed th
Hi, I have a dual athlon mp system running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2, I
have wondered if both cpu's should show in top.
Here is a snapshot of my top output.
last pid: 15520; load averages: 0.28, 0.09, 0.03up 7+23:21:08 23:05:33
153 processes: 2 running, 151 sleeping
CPU states: 0.2% user,
On Wed, 12.01.2005 at 17:38:56 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I did a buildworld /buildkernel with a RELENG_5 box using the following
> flags
>
>
> CPUTYPE=i686
> KERNCONF=recycle
> CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe
> COPTFLAGS=-O2 -pipe
> NO_MODULES=true# do not build modules with the kernel
> MODULES_WITH_WOR
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 07:56:52PM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The command 'tail' has a very nice feature in HEAD.
> It can do 'tail -f' on multiple files. Is it possible that this gets
> backported to RELENG_5?
>
Cool, I currently get this functionality from misc/xtail. xtail was o
Hello,
The command 'tail' has a very nice feature in HEAD.
It can do 'tail -f' on multiple files. Is it possible that this gets
backported to RELENG_5?
I saw in cvsweb, that the committer was paul, but I don't know his e-mail
address to ask him.
Or should I file a PR?
Greetings,
Ronald.
--
R
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Meltzer
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 9:19 PM
> To: freebsd stable
> Subject: twa breakage on AMD64 with 9.1.5.2 3ware version
> and2005-01-1103:00:49 UTC RELENG_5 commit
>
>
> The new 3wa
Thank you for your response. Please don't reply to this message - it is an
automated response and your reply will not be received.
If you have a question for eBay Customer Support, please visit the following
eBay Help page. This page will help you locate the answer to your question, or
assist
On Wed, 2005-Jan-12 13:36:04 -0800, Rick Updegrove wrote:
>Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
>fault virtual address = 0x4d
>fault code = supervisor read, page not present
>instruction pointer= 0x8:0xc061c642
That's a NULL pointer dereference. It's not necessarily har
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 22:36, Rick Updegrove wrote:
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
[ ... ]
>
> So, I am still trying to obtain a dump.
>
> Thanks to your reply, I did re-read #KERNEL-PANIC-TROUBLESHOOTING
> more carefully and I did try the following.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] nm -n /boot/kernel | grep c
21 matches
Mail list logo
