Re: page fault panic in 4.10-STABLE ...

2004-12-02 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Just as a follow up ... right now, we suspect that the trigger for this panic is svnadmin ... a client reported running it just before all three crashes ... I'm going to test the theory on sat, to see if it does, in fact, trigger it ... if so, something svnadmin is doing on creating a new repos

Re: problems with loader

2004-12-02 Thread Jose M Rodriguez
El Jueves, 2 de Diciembre de 2004 19:57, Kevin Oberman escribió: > > From: Jose M Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:30:50 +0100 > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > El Jueves, 2 de Diciembre de 2004 19:06, Konstantin Volevatch escribió: > > > Hi, Jose! > > > > > > In /bo

Re: 5.3 Loader Too Fragile

2004-12-02 Thread Roger L. Beeman
First, thanks for your reply. My complaint about fragility was actually directed at the Loader's inability to usefully indicate what it was unable to deal with. I realize that there is precious little code space for elaborate error messages, but it's inability to keep the console directed at the s

Re: make -j$n buildworld : use of -j investigated

2004-12-02 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 2:08 PM +0900 11/23/04, Rob wrote: Hi, I have tested following with FreeBSD 5.3-Stable. On several different PCs I have used make -j$n buildworld with $n ranging from 1 to 9. Although people suggest "-j4" as optimal in general case, I have come to a very different conclusion... So, I finally

Re: 4.x can't read 5.x dump?

2004-12-02 Thread Kirk Strauser
On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:55, Nick Barnes wrote: > There's no theoretical reason why the formats used by dump and restore > shouldn't be forward and backward compatible, allowing an older > restore (to an older filesystem type) to pick out the parts of the > dump which make sense to it while

Re: Java/Tomcat

2004-12-02 Thread Dick Davies
* alex bustamante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1206 18:06]: > > > alex bustamante wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I need to serve .jsp's with jakarta. Read somewhere that compiling the > >> jdk > >> and getting it to work with jakarta isn't the eaysiest thing to do. Is > >> Linux prefered for this task, or will

Re: problems with loader

2004-12-02 Thread Kevin Oberman
> From: Jose M Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:30:50 +0100 > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > El Jueves, 2 de Diciembre de 2004 19:06, Konstantin Volevatch escribió: > > Hi, Jose! > > > > In /boot/defaults/loader.conf : > > module_path="/boot/modules" > > > > You can override

Timecounter problems on 5.3 - things take twice as long

2004-12-02 Thread Arjan Van Leeuwen
Hi, I have a weird problem on a dual Xeon 550MHz system running 5.3-RELEASE. Everything takes twice as long as it should. Example: winston% time sleep 2 sleep 2 0.00s user 0.00s system 0% cpu 4.006 total The same for pings, the scsi delay when booting, etc. The time of the system itself doesn't

Re: problems with loader

2004-12-02 Thread Jose M Rodriguez
El Jueves, 2 de Diciembre de 2004 19:06, Konstantin Volevatch escribiÃ: > Hi, Jose! > > In /boot/defaults/loader.conf : > module_path="/boot/modules" > > You can override it with: > module_path="/boot/kernel" > tried. doesn' work. Anyone else see this? > Ð ÑÐÐÐÑ ÐÑ ÐÐÑÐÐÑÐ 02 ÐÑÑ 2004 1

Re: problems with loader

2004-12-02 Thread Konstantin Volevatch
Hi, Jose! In /boot/defaults/loader.conf : module_path="/boot/modules" You can override it with: module_path="/boot/kernel" В сообщении от Четверг 02 Декабрь 2004 18:47 Jose M Rodriguez написал(a): > Hi, > this is RELENG_5 as of today, but I notice this several days before. > > Right now, I can't

Re: Java/Tomcat

2004-12-02 Thread alex bustamante
> alex bustamante wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I need to serve .jsp's with jakarta. Read somewhere that compiling the >> jdk >> and getting it to work with jakarta isn't the eaysiest thing to do. Is >> Linux prefered for this task, or will i do better with FreeBSD? >> Thanks. >> > > We regularly compile Ja

Re: Java/Tomcat

2004-12-02 Thread jl
> alex bustamante wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I need to serve .jsp's with jakarta. Read somewhere that compiling the jdk >> and getting it to work with jakarta isn't the eaysiest thing to do. Is >> Linux prefered for this task, or will i do better with FreeBSD? >> Thanks. >> > > We regularly compile Jakart

Re: Java/Tomcat

2004-12-02 Thread Scott Long
Matt Rudderham wrote: alex bustamante wrote: Hi, I need to serve .jsp's with jakarta. Read somewhere that compiling the jdk and getting it to work with jakarta isn't the eaysiest thing to do. Is Linux prefered for this task, or will i do better with FreeBSD? Thanks. We regularly compile Jakarta/T

Re: Java/Tomcat

2004-12-02 Thread Matt Rudderham
alex bustamante wrote: Hi, I need to serve .jsp's with jakarta. Read somewhere that compiling the jdk and getting it to work with jakarta isn't the eaysiest thing to do. Is Linux prefered for this task, or will i do better with FreeBSD? Thanks. We regularly compile Jakarta/Tomcat from ports without

Java/Tomcat

2004-12-02 Thread alex bustamante
Hi, I need to serve .jsp's with jakarta. Read somewhere that compiling the jdk and getting it to work with jakarta isn't the eaysiest thing to do. Is Linux prefered for this task, or will i do better with FreeBSD? Thanks. -- alex bustamante - [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: More geom classes?

2004-12-02 Thread Ivan Voras
Terje Elde wrote: > ggate would be one option, but it'd be much nicer to have it as a > 'real' geom module. It would, but I don't know enough to make a kernel module. A password will still be required, for generating the random sequence... *cringe* The only point of using such a XOR is to end up w

Re: Unkillable zombie sshd-s?

2004-12-02 Thread Ivan Voras
Ronald Klop wrote: On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:06:21 +0100, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can I find out what their parent processes are? (something like tree-shaped ps?) /usr/ports/sysutils/pstree and ps can display the ppid (parent pid). Thanks, parents were stuck and had to be killed.

problems with loader

2004-12-02 Thread Jose M Rodriguez
Hi, this is RELENG_5 as of today, but I notice this several days before. Right now, I can't load modules from loader via _load="YES" on /boot/loader.conf Only kernel and acpi module loaded. Notice this with snd_via8233_load="YES" This is a known issue? thanks in advance, -- josemi _

[TEST] netgraph callout interface

2004-12-02 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Dear collegues, we are working on making netgraph ISR mpsafe. To do it we need to fix all (ab)users of bare timeout(9) in src/sys/netgraph. These timeout calls are running in synch with netgraph now because timeout(9) is Giant-locked. As soon as we mark ISR mpsafe, they are going to break. Th

Re: Unkillable zombie sshd-s?

2004-12-02 Thread Lars Eighner
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Ivan Voras wrote: Mark Andrews wrote: Is there a way to find out what has happened and why does the situation occur? (I can't reboot the server for testing) You can't kill them because they are already dead. They are just holding state so that the parent process ca

Re: Unkillable zombie sshd-s?

2004-12-02 Thread Ronald Klop
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:06:21 +0100, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can I find out what their parent processes are? (something like tree-shaped ps?) /usr/ports/sysutils/pstree and ps can display the ppid (parent pid). -- Ronald Klop, Amsterdam, The Netherlands _

Re: Unkillable zombie sshd-s?

2004-12-02 Thread Ivan Voras
Mark Andrews wrote: Is there a way to find out what has happened and why does the situation occur? (I can't reboot the server for testing) You can't kill them because they are already dead. They are just holding state so that the parent process can know how they died. Once th

RE: 4.x can't read 5.x dump?

2004-12-02 Thread Jaime Bozza
>There's no theoretical reason why the formats used by dump and >restore shouldn't be forward and backward compatible, allowing >an older restore (to an older filesystem type) to pick out the >parts of the dump which make sense to it while ignoring parts >which it doesn't understand. > >But they ar

Re: Making a data DVD with 4.10 and dvd+rw-format

2004-12-02 Thread Donald Goodwin
I had the same exact problem a few weeks ago. Did you make sure the pass through devices are configured? Check to see what pass device is needed by issuing the folowing command (as root of course): camcontrol devlist For example, mine was on pass4. I had to run: /dev/ sh MAKEDEV pass5 (I had

Re: Unkillable zombie sshd-s?

2004-12-02 Thread Mark Andrews
> I found out today that I have two zombie sshd processes on a busy server > (dozen or so users over ssh, many other services), and I can't kill them. > > sshd38653 0.0 0.0 00 ?? ZMon08AM 0:00.03 > sshd75851 0.0 0.0 00 ?? Z 7:33PM 0:00.08 > > kill -

Re: 4.x can't read 5.x dump?

2004-12-02 Thread Nick Barnes
At 2004-12-02 02:40:53+, Ken Smith writes: > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 10:48:43AM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote: > > > I'm backing up a 5.x machine at the moment with this command: > > > > dump -0Lau -b128 -f - /var | gzip -2 | ssh FreeBSD4 dd of=aacd0s1f.gz > > > > After the dump finishes, I try t

Unkillable zombie sshd-s?

2004-12-02 Thread Ivan Voras
I found out today that I have two zombie sshd processes on a busy server (dozen or so users over ssh, many other services), and I can't kill them. sshd38653 0.0 0.0 00 ?? ZMon08AM 0:00.03 sshd75851 0.0 0.0 00 ?? Z 7:33PM 0:00.08 kill -9 doesn't compla

Re: 4.10 -> 5.3 migration; what happens to vinum volumes?

2004-12-02 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:42:23 +, Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:38:38PM +0100, Lukas Ertl wrote: > > Your config looks sane enough that it shouldn't be a problem to switch > > to gvinum. Edit your fstab and put > > > > geom_vinum_load="YES" > > > > into /boot

Re: Making a data DVD with 4.10 and dvd+rw-format

2004-12-02 Thread flip vernooy
Scott Sewall wrote: I'm running FreeBSD 4.10 and trying to make a data DVD. I've following the procedure outlined in the handbook without any success. Any hints or advise would be grealty appreciated. -- Scott lilo# growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/cd0 -J -R blitz10 :-( unable to open("/dev/cd0",O

Re: amd64/71644: amd64 5.3-BETA4 crash when heavy load

2004-12-02 Thread Xin LI
Hi, Robert, Would you please take a look at kern/71644? Since the submitter have 24G of RAM so it might be difficult for him to obtain a crashdump, will the backtrace provided helpful to track down what is happening? On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:29:04PM +0800, Wei-Kai Wu wrote: > Here is the panic