Hi list,
if you suppose your computer has sufficient performance, please try to
disable or adjust parameters of Interrupt Moderation of em.
In my router(Xeon 2.4GHz and on-board two em interfaces) case, it
improves a router's packet forwarding performance. I think the
interrupt delay by Interr
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:29:17PM +0100, Michael Schuh wrote:
> From: Michael Schuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:13:00 +0100
> Subject: Re: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and
> NFS)/Performance issues
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Hi,
>
> i have same serious probl
From: Michael Schuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:13:00 +0100
Subject: Re: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and
NFS)/Performance issues
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
i have same serious problems.
I don't repeate the posting, and describe my tests that i have made
with RELEN
Polling should not produce any improvement over interrupts for EM0.
The EM0 card will aggregate 8-14+ packets per interrupt, or more.
which is only around 8000 interrupts/sec. I've got a ton of these
cards installed.
# mount_nfs -a 4 dhcp61:/home /mnt
# dd if=/mnt/x of=/d
VER in your environment (or in pkgtools.conf) to bdb_hash
Typo, meant bdb1_hash. There's now an entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING about this
issue, too (20041118).
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Daniel Eriksson wrote:
> I have a Tyan Tiger MPX board (dual AthlonMP) that has two 64bit PCI
> slots. I have an Adaptec 29160 and a dual port Intel Pro/1000 MT
> plugged into those slots.
>
> As can be seen from the vmstat -i output below, em1 shares ithread with
> ahc0.
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Also, make sure that you aren't sharing interrupts between
> GIANT-LOCKED and non-giant-locked cards. This might be exposing bugs
> in the network layer that debug.mpsafenet=0 might correct. Just
> noticed that our setup here has that setup, so I'll be looking into
> that
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: (1) I'd first off check that there wasn't a serious interrupt problem on
: the box, which is often triggered by ACPI problems. Get the box to be
: as idle as possible, and then use vmstat -i or stat -vm
Andreas Braukmann said:
> --On Mittwoch, 17. November 2004 20:48 Uhr -0500 Mike Jakubik
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have two PCs connected together, using the em card. One is FreeBSD 6
>> from Fri Nov 5 , the other is Windows XP. I am using the default mtu of
>> 1500, no polling, and i get
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:50:11 +0100, Dirk Arlt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i would add mergemaster to this
Oops.
(or ports/sysinstall/etcmerge)
Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Hello,
First: Ports are independent of the version of your system.
Second: Updating your system is described here.
h
Ben Paley wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 November 2004 18:27, Jon Noack wrote:
>>> # Flash6 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany
>>> #[/usr/local/lib/linux-flashplugin6/libflashplayer.so]
>>> [/usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/libflashplayer.so]
>>> #libpthread.so.0 liblthread.so.3
>>> libp
i would add mergemaster to this
Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> First: Ports are independent of the version of your system.
> Second: Updating your system is described here.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cutting-edge.html
>
> But it is not a
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 18:27, Jon Noack wrote:
> > # Flash6 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany
> > #[/usr/local/lib/linux-flashplugin6/libflashplayer.so]
> > [/usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/libflashplayer.so]
> > #libpthread.so.0 liblthread.so.3
> > libpthread.so.0 plug
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:27:44PM +, Robert Watson wrote..
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> >
> > > I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer
> > > rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel G
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:27:44PM +, Robert Watson wrote..
>
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
>
> > I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer
> > rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet
> > Cards to solve my performance prob
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:57:41PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> +> Dear best guys,
> +>
> +> I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer
> rates,
> +> after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Card
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer
> rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet
> Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*):
I think the first thing you want to do is to try and determ
iam very amazed, because i thought that with this ldap line its also
necessary that
'account required pam_unix.so' must return 'ok' that the authorization
part is successfull, but the ldap account is there not available.
but thanks anyway it solved my requirements!
hi again,
i recognized that if t
Hello,
First: Ports are independent of the version of your system.
Second: Updating your system is described here.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cutting-edge.html
But it is not a short howto. :-)
The short path is something like this.
copy and edit /usr/share/examples/cv
Dear,
I am still confusing about FreeBSD versioning.
MY SYSTEM:
- I install the freebsd 5_3 release:
kern.osreldate: 503001
FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Nov 9 13:34:27 CET 2004
- I cvsup the ports collection
cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
(ok)
- I upgrade the ports collection
pkgdb -F
port
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 04:05:04 -0500, Suleiman Souhlal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 03:46, Ronald Klop wrote:
For what I have seen everybody uses snd_emu10k1. Since I use my onboard
soundcard (snd_ess* (not MPSAFE)) I have less problems with my sound
under
disk load.
No
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:57:41PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
+> Dear best guys,
+>
+> I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates,
+> after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve
+> my performance problem (*laugh*):
[...]
I done
Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> For what I have seen everybody uses snd_emu10k1. Since I use my onboard
> soundcard (snd_ess* (not MPSAFE)) I have less problems with my sound under
> disk load.
> [...]
No, I don't. I use and_emu10kx, which behaves far better under high load
than the
Because you have specified that the failure of pam_ldap is not fatal to
the account stack. The "sufficient" control means:
If this module returns success, then stop stack processing and return
success to the application. Otherwise continue processing.
Since the access check constitutes a "failure"
Hi,
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 03:46, Ronald Klop wrote:
> For what I have seen everybody uses snd_emu10k1. Since I use my onboard
> soundcard (snd_ess* (not MPSAFE)) I have less problems with my sound under
> disk load.
None of the sound drivers are actually MPSAFE.. The reason people that
use
Hi, thanks for your reply!
my goal is to authenticate through ldap and to do some specific
authorization checks.
for failover i have one account in /etc/passwd in case of a downtime of
ldap so that its still possible to login throught local authentication.
Further more i have inside of ldap.conf
Hello!
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Paul Mather wrote:
kernel devstat(9) subsystem only sees my ad0. Under 4.10-RELEASE, sysctl
kern.devstat.numdevs gives 3, but under 5.3-RELEASE only 1. How can I enable
disk statistics gathering for disks other than HDD in 5.3-RELEASE?
The gstat(8) command will display s
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:40:23 +0100, Krzysztof Kowalik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Recently I took some time to upgrade my home 4.9 system to
5.3-RELEASE (fortunately, taking full system dump before, so I can
easily get back). In fact just after upgrading I ran into the weird
issue durin
--On Mittwoch, 17. November 2004 20:48 Uhr -0500 Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have two PCs connected together, using the em card. One is FreeBSD 6
from Fri Nov 5 , the other is Windows XP. I am using the default mtu of
1500, no polling, and i get ~ 21MB/s tranfser rates via ftp. Im s
29 matches
Mail list logo
