Re: OpenSSL Base System vs. OpenSSL port SNAPSHOT

why is apache not compiling, my postgresql is compiling without security/openssl.? leafy wrote: >On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:27:58AM -0500, Bruno Lavoie wrote: > > >>To help you to understand look at what i got after deinstalling openssl >>from port: >> >> >Recently OpenSSL 0.9.7d is impor

Re: OpenSSL Base System vs. OpenSSL port SNAPSHOT

On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:27:58AM -0500, Bruno Lavoie wrote: > To help you to understand look at what i got after deinstalling openssl > from port: Recently OpenSSL 0.9.7d is imported into -current, and bsd.openssl.mk is modified for the change, but 0.9.7d isn't in -stable yet, thus the depend

OpenSSL Base System vs. OpenSSL port SNAPSHOT

To help you to understand look at what i got after deinstalling openssl from port: ===> Extracting for apache+mod_ssl-1.3.29+2.8.16_1 >> Checksum OK for apache_1.3.29.tar.gz. >> Checksum OK for mod_ssl-2.8.16-1.3.29.tar.gz. /usr/ports/distfiles//mod_accel-1.0.31.tar.gz: No such file or director

Re: USB bug fix for DETACH message.

thanks! On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Matthew Dillon wrote: > A DragonFly user noticed that usbd does not seem to get DETACH events > for UMASS devices. > > I tracked this down (in the FreeBSD-5 codebase for your convenience) > to line 1382 of usb_subr.c: > > /*usbd_add_dev_e

OpenSSL Base System vs. OpenSSL port

Hello, i'm running releng_4_9 and i've installed some port (mod_php4, postgresql) that uses OpenSSL, but when i do a pkg_tree these packages have in their depedency list the openssl that come from ports. i know that the freebsd base system have openssl, but why my ports aren't taking the openss

USB bug fix for DETACH message.

A DragonFly user noticed that usbd does not seem to get DETACH events for UMASS devices. I tracked this down (in the FreeBSD-5 codebase for your convenience) to line 1382 of usb_subr.c: /*usbd_add_dev_event(USB_EVENT_DEVICE_DETACH, dev);*/ This line was apparentl

Re: building CURRENT release on STABLE box

On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:33:30AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 04:10:56AM +, Colin Percival wrote: > > At 04:08 18/03/2004, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > >I would like to to try building CURRENT release on STABLE (i386) box. > > >Is it technically possible? If so, are the

Re:(2) best wireless (802.11g) NIC for -stable?

oh sorry, I dont think it works in stable, you need 5.x and atheros driver! Palle Girgensohn wrote: Hi, Any tips for a PCI 802.11g NIC (not pc-card, this is *not* a laptop, it's a regular tower machine). Preferably budget, but it must work in -stable. Also, warnings about disfunct ones are app

Re: best wireless (802.11g) NIC for -stable?

senao 3054PCI www.senao.com.tw it has nice 100mW output power and detachable antenna etc. Palle Girgensohn wrote: Hi, Any tips for a PCI 802.11g NIC (not pc-card, this is *not* a laptop, it's a regular tower machine). Preferably budget, but it must work in -stable. Also, warnings about disfunct

Re: kern/60526: Post-PAE stable SMP machine freezes

Doug White wrote: > I HIGHLY recommend using a DIFFERENT controller for disks. The ROSB4 is OK > for CDROMs and the like, but use a different controller for the system > drive. Promise controllers work great. :) Hmm, I use SMP motherboard Intel STL2 with ServerWorks ServerSet III LE and integrat

best wireless (802.11g) NIC for -stable?

Hi, Any tips for a PCI 802.11g NIC (not pc-card, this is *not* a laptop, it's a regular tower machine). Preferably budget, but it must work in -stable. Also, warnings about disfunct ones are appreciated. Thanks, Palle ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis