[releng_4 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-08-17 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-08-18 04:00:12 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-08-18 04:00:12 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-08-18 04:21:51 - building world T

Re: Working configuration for 5.1 and VMware 3 or 2?

2003-08-17 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Neil Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway - 5_1 on Dell Latitude C640. the vmware3 port installs but the > paths are a little odd - isoimages, licences are looked for in > /usr/lib/vmware rather than /usr/local/lib This isn't really the right list -- 5.1 is from -CURRENT, not -STABLE --

Re: Working configuration for 5.1 and VMware 3 or 2?

2003-08-17 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 21:15:36 +0100 (BST) > From: Neil Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > is there something wrong with the mail archive search scripts? I always > seem to get 'list unavailable' :-( I can't help on the main issue, but most FreeBSD mailing lists (includin

Re: [releng_4 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-08-17 Thread Ed Hall
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 14:02:18 -0700, Andy Sparrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The same thing started in -PORTS quite some time ago, where I find > > > personally find that it generates more [EMAIL PROTECTED] than the real traffic > > > at > > > times. > > > > You're entitled to your opinio

Re: [releng_4 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-08-17 Thread Andy Sparrow
> > The same thing started in -PORTS quite some time ago, where I find > > personally find that it generates more [EMAIL PROTECTED] than the real traffic at > > times. > > You're entitled to your opinion, Thanks, I will clarify it further for you. > but since you've never had to deal > with t

Re: Working configuration for 5.1 and VMware 3 or 2?

2003-08-17 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Neil Long wrote: NL> is there something wrong with the mail archive search scripts? I always NL> seem to get 'list unavailable' :-( http://freebsd.rambler.ru/ Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ---

Working configuration for 5.1 and VMware 3 or 2?

2003-08-17 Thread Neil Long
Hello is there something wrong with the mail archive search scripts? I always seem to get 'list unavailable' :-( Anyway - 5_1 on Dell Latitude C640. the vmware3 port installs but the paths are a little odd - isoimages, licences are looked for in /usr/lib/vmware rather than /usr/local/lib I

RE: HA guide/tools

2003-08-17 Thread Don Bowman
> From: Matt Douhan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello > > I have been hunting for some kind of High Availibility guide > for FBSD but not > been successfull in finding one, is there any clustering > solutions for FBSD > STABLE (or CURRENT) ? > > Matt See 'HUT' project (www.bsdshell.net)

HA guide/tools

2003-08-17 Thread Matt Douhan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello I have been hunting for some kind of High Availibility guide for FBSD but not been successfull in finding one, is there any clustering solutions for FBSD STABLE (or CURRENT) ? Matt - -- -

[releng_4 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-08-17 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-08-17 16:00:12 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-08-17 16:00:12 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-08-17 16:23:12 - building world T

Re: [releng_4 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-08-17 Thread pan
>You're entitled to your opinion, but since you've never had to deal >with the flood of support requests when INDEX builds were broken by >careless committers before I started the automated tinderbox, I'd >suggest you try to consider it from point of view of those of us who >are actually involved