[no subject]

2003-03-23 Thread Brad
<>

Re: sendmail issue

2003-03-23 Thread Scott Lambert
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:43:26AM +1030, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting "V. M. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > FWIW I've had sendmail hang on startup for me before; turned out to be DNS > > prob. > > Try verifying name resolution. Did you maybe stomp on your hosts file by > > accident durin

Re: 4.8-RC, XFree86 4.3.0, and GDM

2003-03-23 Thread Matthew Donadio
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > I have never had a problem logging in as a normal user with gdm or > gdm2. How are you creating these users? For sure I know that one user was created when I build the 4.7 system, and another was added with adduser after the upgrade gdm2 worked before the XFree86 4.3.0

Re: 4.8-RC, XFree86 4.3.0, and GDM

2003-03-23 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 13:47, Matthew Donadio wrote: > [ This was originally sent to freebsd-quesions, but upon second thought, > it is probably more appropriate here ] > > Hi all, > > I am having some trouble with GDM and I was wondering if anyone can > either confirm the problem or shed some lig

Re: sendmail issue

2003-03-23 Thread Claus Assmann
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Error messages = zero. Sendmail simply doesn't load :-( Run some basic tests: sendmail -bt -d0.13 < /dev/null sendmail -bs wait for greeting, then type EHLO localhost QUIT If those test don't work, add -d to the options. See also: http://www.s

RE: sendmail issue

2003-03-23 Thread bastill
Quoting "V. M. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > FWIW I've had sendmail hang on startup for me before; turned out to be DNS > prob. > Try verifying name resolution. Did you maybe stomp on your hosts file by > accident during mergemaster -cv? Thanks for yours and other helpful responses. Problem - I c

Re: Posix semaphore problem

2003-03-23 Thread Joe Kelsey
On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 16:06, Mikhail Kruk wrote: > I beleive he is not using SYS V Semaphors but rahter POSIX semaphors. I > don't know about 5.0, but they are definitely not supported in 4.x Posix semaphores in 5.0 are supported with a kludged-together mess of SYSV semaphores and posix-threads..

Re: Posix semaphore problem

2003-03-23 Thread Mikhail Kruk
I beleive he is not using SYS V Semaphors but rahter POSIX semaphors. I don't know about 5.0, but they are definitely not supported in 4.x > > "Bad system call (core dumped)" > > Make sure you have SYS V Semaphores in your kernel. In 4.x, you add the > options SYSVSEM > > (which