## Daniel O'Connor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Actually, if you limit incoming TCP it will adapt to the correct speed.
> I do this at home without hassle (except the latency in games goes up
> from ~40 to ~100 but it is still acceptable)
How much do you have to limit TCP for the desired effect? I nev
Yes i have. This user exist,
$cat /etc/passwd
smmsp:*:25:25:Sendmail Submission User:/var/spool/clientmqueue:/sbin/nologin
AGRI> Have you created the sendmail submission user?
AGRI> smmsp:*:25:25:Sendmail Submission User:/var/spool/clientmqueue:/sbin/nologin
AGRI> On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:
On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 22:56, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> Limit the maximum usage of your line to about 90% to 95%. This prevents
> usage of the queue in your modem. However, this will not work if
> queueing on the remote side is the problem (bulk transfers like downloads
> come to mind); you
No. :-) Thanks.
AGRI> Have you created the sendmail submission user?
AGRI> smmsp:*:25:25:Sendmail Submission User:/var/spool/clientmqueue:/sbin/nologin
AGRI> On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:53:37PM +0400, Ruslan Sulemanov wrote:
>> Hi ALL !
>> I need help, about sendmail 8.12.6 (freebsd 4.7 RC#3)
>
Have you created the sendmail submission user?
smmsp:*:25:25:Sendmail Submission User:/var/spool/clientmqueue:/sbin/nologin
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:53:37PM +0400, Ruslan Sulemanov wrote:
> Hi ALL !
> I need help, about sendmail 8.12.6 (freebsd 4.7 RC#3)
>
> $mail -s 'test' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi ALL !
I need help, about sendmail 8.12.6 (freebsd 4.7 RC#3)
$mail -s 'test' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lala
.
EOF
collect: Cannot write ./dfg96BQ1u6000293 (bfcommit, uid=1000, gid
25):Permission denied
queueup: cannot create queue temp file ./tfg96BQ1u6000293, uid=1000;
Permission denied
To Unsubsc
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
## Maarten de Vries ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I could do with some hints regarding traffic shaping. My homenetwork is
> hooked up to an assymetrical (1536/256) ADSL line, using a FreeBSD 4.6
> system which provides the usual NAT/Gateway/Firewall services. I'm using
> dummynet to control the amount o
Hi all,
I could do with some hints regarding traffic shaping. My homenetwork is
hooked up to an assymetrical (1536/256) ADSL line, using a FreeBSD 4.6
system which provides the usual NAT/Gateway/Firewall services. I'm using
dummynet to control the amount of bandwidth used by certain hosts on the
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Adam Weinberger wrote:
AW> you can likely deduce some answers from:
AW> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.7R/schedule.html
AW>
AW> 4.7-PRERELEASE is a tag marking what the 4.7 release will be all about.
AW> then, 4.7-RC, 4.7-RC2, 4.7-RC3 (RC = release candidate) are snapshots
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 01:43:35AM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> bart -
>
> you can likely deduce some answers from:
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.7R/schedule.html
>
> 4.7-PRERELEASE is a tag marking what the 4.7 release will be all about.
> then, 4.7-RC, 4.7-RC2, 4.7-RC3 (RC = release c
WESTERN PEOPLE, WESTERN GOVERNMENT, DO NOT HELP SADDAM BEING SOFT!
IF YOU GO ON WITH YOUR SICK/SOFT UN POLICY YOU WILL FIND THE BOMBERS
INSIDE YOUR BUS.
WESTERN GOVERNMENT YOUR ELECTORS WILL PUNISH YOU IF YOU HELP SADDAM.
SADDAM = WAR TODAY = 100 WARS TOMORROW
"Basically, I got on the plane w
bart -
you can likely deduce some answers from:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.7R/schedule.html
4.7-PRERELEASE is a tag marking what the 4.7 release will be all about.
then, 4.7-RC, 4.7-RC2, 4.7-RC3 (RC = release candidate) are snapshots
that grow closer and closer to what the RE team feels c
Hello,
I'm following the RELENG_4 branch and as far as I can tell I'm using the
very latest from that branch. My box is telling me it's a 4.7-RC.
Yet, on this list, I see regular references to 4.7-RC2 and sometimes
even 4.7-PRERELEASE. It may be me, but I have no clue what these are.
What are
14 matches
Mail list logo
