Re: Any users of matcd(4), mcd(4), or scd(4)?

2002-10-03 Thread Matthias Andree
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are there any users who use the matcd(4), mcd(4) or scd(4) drivers? Yes, I'm using mcd, but it doesn't quite work. Bigger reads (package file size) break. The same hardware is fine with W*nd*ws NT 4 (dual-boot). > These drivers are for rather old non-s

Re: Any users of matcd(4), mcd(4), or scd(4)?

2002-10-03 Thread ttz
On 03.10-17:01, John Baldwin wrote: [...] >So, is anyone out there still using this old hardware? [...] i still have an old creative 1x drive in a 486 i use (i think they are matsumi ???) -- anyway i haven't even compiled support so i'm not going to cry abo

Re: 'losing' every second packet

2002-10-03 Thread Mike Hoskins
On 3 Oct 2002, Andrew Heybey wrote: > > We also run a freebsd firewall at work 4.4-STABLE that works perfectly > > (uptime 220+ days). Citing similar configurations, I have a 4.6-STABLE box running ipfw+natd+keep-state without any problems at home. However, it's an old p2/300, so I haven't buil

Any users of matcd(4), mcd(4), or scd(4)?

2002-10-03 Thread John Baldwin
Are there any users who use the matcd(4), mcd(4) or scd(4) drivers? These drivers are for rather old non-standard CD-ROM controllers most of which only support 1x speeds. :) There are several changes being made to the kernel API's used by device drivers in -current. Unless we can find some people

ATA problems in 4.7-RC

2002-10-03 Thread Keith Mitchell
I just purchased a new WD 180GB ATA-100 disk drive for my FreeBSD machine and am having problems getting the drive working correctly. Originally I had this drive attached to the onboard IDE controller on my MB (Asus TUSLC-2) but had problems so I installed the promise ATA100TX2 controller card th

Re: 4.4->RELENG_4 error when running make...

2002-10-03 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Jeff Love wrote: > >Of course, if you installed the new system before building the new > >kernel, you would not have hit this problem, but you are living > >dangerously when you install the new world and try to run with the old > >kernel. > > > That is exactly how I've

Tuning kern.polling

2002-10-03 Thread Steve Shorter
Howdy! I was doing some stress testing of a SCSI chain on a 4.6.2 system with 2 big RAID volumes by just having lots of processes moving lots of data over the SCSI buss. The box has fxp network interfaces with polling enabled. the kernel config has options HZ=1000. kern.polli

[no subject]

2002-10-03 Thread Harvey Cary
-- Thanks, Harvey Cary CISSP, MCSE+I [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opsecurity.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: 'losing' every second packet

2002-10-03 Thread Andrew Heybey
> about 3-4 weeks ago my home firewall started to exhibit a strange > behaviour of losing what appears to be every second packet but _only_ > after it has been running for more than 12 hrs (typically around the > 24hr mark). The only way to 'fix' it is to reboot. Restarting firewall > rules does

Re: Segfaults and bus errors in 4.6.2?

2002-10-03 Thread Chris Stenton
> On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 22:56, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:33:03AM +0800, Clive Lin wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 03:56:42PM -0400, Robert Withrow wrote: > > > > In the referenced message I reported a problem with segfaults and bus errors > > > > when building openof