On Monday, May 27, 2002, at 03:43 AM, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 11:41:39PM -0400, Phil Rosenthal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've been using vinum for about a year now, and have been using it on
>> some
>> pretty large, heavily accessed RAID5 file system (500GB & 70MB
Hi,
I have one dual celeron 400 MHz that i runed a make buildworld. And then i
export /usr/src and /usr/obj with nfs to my box that I world like to
upgrade. Its an p90 laptop, so that is why Im doing the build on my dual
400. :)
Any way when I run make installworld on the laptop, I get goes for
As this thread once more suggests, the whole concept of pidfiles is broken.
The proper way is to use a service control manager which keeps track of
processes, allowing them to be stopped/restarted etc. through a single API. (I
am not going to mention AIX's System Resource Controller again because
[Redirecting to the hackers list -- please respect the reply-to header]
> "Claus" == Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Claus> On Mon, May 27, 2002, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
>> Any particular reason why the sendmail with 4.6-RC is writing sm-
>> client.pid into /var/spool/c
jupiter# pstat -T
31870/49152 files
1080M/3071M swap space
jupiter# pstat -T | less
Can't make pipe.
jupiter# uname -a
FreeBSD jupiter.hub.org 4.6-RC FreeBSD 4.6-RC #11: Sun May 19 14:01:38 CDT 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/kernel i386
jupiter#
What else should I be looking
I did it with the filesystem mounted.
--Phil
- Original Message -
From: "Vallo Kallaste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Phil Rosenthal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: Hardware RAID vs vinum
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 12:26:33PM -0400, Phil Rosenthal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you had dying disk in your vinum R5 configuration? If yes can
> > you please tell me how you rebuilt new disk? I have had no luck
> > rebuilding failed disk while filesystem on the degraded array is
> > m
I posted this a while back but didn't get much of an answer beyond (use a 3com
card instead). I have a bunch of Dell 1550's with on board Intel NIC's. I
received the following messages on the console (below), any attempt to ping
results in the message "No buffer space available."
May 14 16:03
Yes I have, but I dont remember exactely how.
I believe you switch the drive, and then use the command to star the drive
you just inserted.
--Phil
- Original Message -
From: "Vallo Kallaste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Phil Rosenthal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTE
On 27 May 2002, at 8:10, Claus Assmann boldly uttered:
> On Mon, May 27, 2002, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
> > Any particular reason why the sendmail with 4.6-RC is writing sm-
> > client.pid into /var/spool/clientmqueue instead of /var/run?
>
> Permissions.
>
> > Is this because it needs to be in
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Mon, May 27, 2002, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
> Any particular reason why the sendmail with 4.6-RC is writing sm-
> client.pid into /var/spool/clientmqueue instead of /var/run?
Permissions.
> Is this because it needs to be in a world-writable directory because
> it's not run as root?
/var/spoo
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 06:02:23AM -0700, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group
>wrote:
>
> > Did we see a difference in CPU utilization? No. However ODS and VxVM
> > run below the kernel and cannot be measured by vmstat or sar, which is
> > differen
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 03:35:52PM +0200, Miguel Mendez wrote:
Hi, hate to quote myself...
> I feel curious about this. Both ODS and VxVM are just kernel modules
> that sit between hardware and the VFS layer if I'm not mistaken. What
^^
What I meant the
14 matches
Mail list logo
