Re: makeworld problem - my first attempt at this

2002-05-16 Thread Chip Wiegand
On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 13:59, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > Hi Chip, > > I has the same problem (and a lot of more problems) when I use > mergemaster in my first update. > > At the time, someone said to me to use mergemaster in this form: > > # mergemaster -svia > #

Re: new ATA bug

2002-05-16 Thread Vladislav V. Zhuk
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 12:25:53PM -0700, Doug White wrote: > > > When will be fixed bug with definition interfeces in new ata? > > > > > > I have disabled secondary IDE interface in BIOS and kernel config: > > > > > > # ATA and ATAPI devices > > > device ata0at isa? port IO_WD1 irq

Re: 4.5 and mpd "no buffer space available on high load" ??

2002-05-16 Thread Archie Cobbs
Karl M. Joch writes: > ->> when box 1 sends the file via cp command to box 2 (1 mounts 2 via > nfs) after it is created i immedialy get "no bufferspace available" on > every action box 1 does. the strange thing is, when letting the same > file being picked up by box 2 (box2 mounting box1 via nf

Re: Tar broken for large files?

2002-05-16 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
On May 14, 2002 08:14:03 pm -0700, Lou Katz wrote: > Obviousls, tar is not copying things correctly. Is this a known bug? > # tar --version > GNU tar version 1.11.2 did you try w/ the port version of GNU tar, not the base system one ? # type gtar gtar is /usr/local/bin/gtar # gtar --version tar

Re: maestro3 and mixer volume set incorrectly in 4.6-RC

2002-05-16 Thread Ben Lovett
Ahh, thanks. At first I thought I had gotten lucky and wasn't seeing the hanging upon resume, but when I tried to ssh to my system from another box, and I didn't get a response, I found that it had panicked. It seemed odd that I could not get a backtrace even when I have DDB enabled, as well as "

Re: Tar broken for large files?

2002-05-16 Thread Andy Farkas
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Tod McQuillin wrote: > As it turns out, FreeBSD's tar is in fact GNU tar, albeit an older > version. > > % tar --version > GNU tar version 1.11.2 Its a *very* hacked-at version of GNU tar 1.11.2. It should be hacked at some more to teach it about >2g file sizes. -- :{ [E

Re: Tar broken for large files?

2002-05-16 Thread Tod McQuillin
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Jack L. Stone wrote: > >Install gtar from ports. > > I've incurred aborted backups with tar (+ gzip) lately too. What is > superior about gtar...??? As it turns out, FreeBSD's tar is in fact GNU tar, albeit an older version. % tar --version GNU tar version 1.11.2 If you wa

Re: Tar broken for large files?

2002-05-16 Thread Andy Farkas
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Jack L. Stone wrote: > I've incurred aborted backups with tar (+ gzip) lately too. What is > superior about gtar...??? it works with >2g files :) -- :{ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy Farkas System Administrator Speednet Communications http://www.speednet.com.au/

Re: Tar broken for large files?

2002-05-16 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 12:21 PM 5.17.2002 +1000, Andy Farkas wrote: >> Obviousls, tar is not copying things correctly. Is this a known bug? >> # tar --version >> GNU tar version 1.11.2 > >Our tar is broken for files > 2g :( > >Install gtar from ports. > I've incurred aborted backups with tar (+ gzip) lately too. Wha

Re: linksys nic

2002-05-16 Thread Andy Farkas
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Mike Grissom wrote: > May 14 08:52:06 mission /kernel: dc0: TX underrun -- using store and forward mode man 4 dc -- :{ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy Farkas System Administrator Speednet Communications http://www.speednet.com.au/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: Tar broken for large files?

2002-05-16 Thread Andy Farkas
> Obviousls, tar is not copying things correctly. Is this a known bug? > # tar --version > GNU tar version 1.11.2 Our tar is broken for files > 2g :( Install gtar from ports. -- :{ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy Farkas System Administrator Speednet Communications http://www.speednet.

Re: new ATA bug

2002-05-16 Thread Ian
On 05/16/02 13:25, Doug White wrote: > On Thu, 16 May 2002, Tod McQuillin wrote: > >> On Thu, 16 May 2002, Vladislav V. Zhuk wrote: >> >>> When will be fixed bug with definition interfeces in new ata? >>> >>> I have disabled secondary IDE interface in BIOS and kernel config: >>> >>> # ATA and

Re: static routes broken in 4.6-PRE ?

2002-05-16 Thread Gregory Bond
> This line in rc.conf used to work in 4.5-STABLE: > > static_routes="-net 192.168.1.0 10.1.1.1 -netmask 255.255.255.0" I can't imagine how. That is never how the static_routes rc.conf variable has worked. see man rc.conf, what you want is something like static_routes="mynet" route_mynet="