> where are you getting the 2U half-depth cases from?
www.rackable.com (who is actually doing all the dirty work of having to
touch PC hardware at all, and delivered to us finished cabinets of
computers). I believe that they are manufacturing their own cases for
this, though it is possible that
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tim Kellers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I see that same message on the Dell latitude I'm using --with both the Dell
: TrueMobile and the Orinoco Wavelan cards (both gold and silver). Apparently
: is cause no trouble (that I've seen). If it didn't
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:44:54AM -0800, Jason Fesler wrote:
> If you don't mind putting your own boxes together (or going through a
> reseller that does), I"m finding the SBC2 Intel boards (aka, Coos Bay) are
> working fairly well. F2 does work over serial; comes with dual nic built
> in; runni
I see that same message on the Dell latitude I'm using --with both the Dell
TrueMobile and the Orinoco Wavelan cards (both gold and silver). Apparently
is cause no trouble (that I've seen). If it didn't show up in red on my
console, I'd probably not have noticed it until I read a dmesg
Tim
I have an AMD 486 DX-100 machine that has run flawlessly since
4.0-RELEASE. Although slow, I build custom kernels, and use ports to
build and install software. The software on this machine is minimal
as I use it for my firewall and to serve DHCP requests. Here is the
list of installed ports:
b
When did a single libcrypt replace the separate libdescrypt and
libscrypt libraries in -STABLE?
My reason for asking...
I've been having some odd errors[1] when profiling, and finally
traced it down to a stale libdescrypt.so.2 library remaining in
/usr/lib.
Is there any harm in removing the des
Actually, I just had happen something similar. In this case, I just
rebuilt the box with an SMP kernel, and when I rebooted, no RAID 1
e.g. before
Mar 22 14:49:16 raidtest /kernel: twe0: <3ware Storage Controller> port
0xb000-0xb00f irq 15 at device 9.0 on pci0
Mar 22 14:49:16 raidtest /kern
Hiya
I've recently been experiencing slowdowns on my server's outgoing
network port, which occur after half a day to a day after the last
reboot.
To briefly summarise:
I have an old K6-2 300 acting as a gateway and firewall between
my internal network and my DSL connection. It was working fin
Well, same (kernel-panic with hw.ata.tags="1") for me:
...
atapci0: port 0xd000-0xd00f at device \
7.1 on pci0
atapci0: Correcting VIA config for southbridge data corruption bug
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
...
ad0: 43979MB [89355/16/63] at ata0-mast
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> Please let me know asap if you encounter any (new) problems with the
> ATA driver after this commit.
I have a Digital Celebris 6200 (PPro 200MHz) with an Orinoco isa<->pcmcia
bridge and an Orinoco 802.11b card.
Using STABLE before the new ATA driver w
10 matches
Mail list logo
