Re: FreeBSD Memory Requirements Legacy and Present

2002-01-18 Thread John Utz
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > > 4.2 was the last release that can be installed from FTP using NIC > > with 8Mb RAM/no swap. It's still possible to install 4.4-RELEASE > > from FTP using NIC with 8Mb RAM but the first step in sysinstall must > > be allo

RE: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING

2002-01-18 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, tony wrote: > is this documented somewhere? when I left the maxusers at 0 it said > something along the lines of "max users set to 0, assuming 8" now 8 > seems very low to me, will that in some way automatically grow during > normal operation of the system? You are probabl

Cyrus+pam_radius. How to make work?

2002-01-18 Thread Pavel A Crasotin
Hi I'v a asked in cyrus-info but seems none knows why cyrus-imap 2.0.16 (cyrus-sasl-1.15.27) dont work with pam_radius. Can anyone help me? Here is log of my testing imapd.conf: sasl_pwcheck_method: PAM /etc/pam.conf: imap auth required pam_radius.so try_first_pass pop3 auth required

Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING

2002-01-18 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > See, people keep saying it's in the handbook, and I keep reading: > > > > doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig/chapter.sgml > > Truely strange, it is in the handbook, but not in the above, maybe it > hasn't been regenerated late

Latest RC breaks gdomap

2002-01-18 Thread Pete French
Until today I was running the PRERELEASE version of 4.5, and I cvsupped to 4.5-RC thisd afternoon (about 1500GMT). gdomap (GNUstep distributed objecst mapper) no longer works. Attempting to start it gives the following errors: SIOCGIFFLAGS: Device not configured SIOCGIFFLAGS: Device not configure

Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING

2002-01-18 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
> See, people keep saying it's in the handbook, and I keep reading: > > doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig/chapter.sgml > Truely strange, it is in the handbook, but not in the above, maybe it hasn't been regenerated lately? -- David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree N

Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING

2002-01-18 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, "tony" wrote: > is this documented somewhere? Release notes, tuning(7), coming soon to the Handbook I believe. > when I left the maxusers at 0 it said > something along the lines of "max users set to 0, assuming 8" now 8 seems > very low to me, will that in some way au

Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING

2002-01-18 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Lawrence Sica wrote: > > And it should even appear in the handbook, which last I checked it still > > didn't. > > It is in the handbook, that is how i ended the argument with some people > :) > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-kerne

RE: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING

2002-01-18 Thread tony
is this documented somewhere? when I left the maxusers at 0 it said something along the lines of "max users set to 0, assuming 8" now 8 seems very low to me, will that in some way automatically grow during normal operation of the system? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:

Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING

2002-01-18 Thread Nevermind
Hello, Ruslan Ermilov! On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 06:23:25PM +0200, you wrote: > > > I suppose we should note that using in kernel "maxusers 0" > > > is now default and recomended setting now. > > > > UPDATING is for issues that could potentially cause a system to break > > during an upgrade. T

Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING

2002-01-18 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 07:57:37AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Nevermind wrote: > > > I suppose we should note that using in kernel "maxusers 0" > > is now default and recomended setting now. > > UPDATING is for issues that could potentially cause a system to break

Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING

2002-01-18 Thread Lawrence Sica
- Original Message - From: "Robert Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nevermind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:15 AM Subject: Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING > And it should even appear in

Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING

2002-01-18 Thread Lawrence Sica
- Original Message - From: "Nevermind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 7:11 AM Subject: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING > Hello, > > I suppose we should note that using in kernel "maxusers 0" >

Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING

2002-01-18 Thread Robert Watson
And it should even appear in the handbook, which last I checked it still didn't. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Nevermind wrote: > Hello, > > I suppose we should note that using