Re: mmap busted in 4.3?

2001-11-19 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 18-Nov-2001 Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Guess what chipset it's on? > The dd copies have had 1 error so far.. I copied the fix from -current and my problems have been solved.. Interestingly after applying the fix I get a number of 'dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold' messages. MFC p

Re: Has the size of stable /modules increased a lot lately?

2001-11-19 Thread Mark . Andrews
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bruce A > . Mah writes: > : --==_Exmh_834049033P > : Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > : > : If memory serves me right, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > : > : > The file which changed was: > : > src/sys/conf/Makefile.i386 > : > > : > For the RELENG_4

Re: Has the size of stable /modules increased a lot lately?

2001-11-19 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bruce A. Mah writes: : --==_Exmh_834049033P : Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii : : If memory serves me right, Garance A Drosihn wrote: : : > The file which changed was: : > src/sys/conf/Makefile.i386 : > : > For the RELENG_4 branch, the significant

Re: Has the size of stable /modules increased a lot lately?

2001-11-19 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > The file which changed was: > src/sys/conf/Makefile.i386 > > For the RELENG_4 branch, the significant commit was: > 1.179.2.6 done on Thu Oct 18th. [snip] Awesome...great explanation. Might be a couple days until my next release

Re: Has the size of stable /modules increased a lot lately?

2001-11-19 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 9:31 PM -0700 11/19/01, Chad R. Larson wrote: >On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:49:49PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: >> The comments for the commit include "which adds the ability to >> compile modules -g as well" (among other things). The original >> commit to current (1.241 on Aug 2nd) was a

Re: Has the size of stable /modules increased a lot lately?

2001-11-19 Thread Chad R. Larson
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:49:49PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > The comments for the commit include "which adds the ability to > compile modules -g as well" (among other things). The original > commit to current (1.241 on Aug 2nd) was a bit more explicit as > to the effect: "When building a

Re: prism2 128 bit wep keys?

2001-11-19 Thread Chad R. Larson
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:52:21PM -0800, Nick Sayer wrote: > Peter Radcliffe wrote: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] probably said: >>>I just obtained a Linksys 802.11b access point. I previously was >>>using an Apple Airport. 64 bit (40 bit, really) WEP keys work, but >>>128 bit (104 bit, really) keys don't

Re: Has the size of stable /modules increased a lot lately?

2001-11-19 Thread Chad R. Larson
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 02:28:27PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Warner Losh wrote: >> : I could put it in the release notes if you feel that's a more appropriate >> : place? >> >> I think it might be. It certainly wouldn't hurt there. If I were to vote, I'd put it in

Re: Problem building KDE 2.2.1 on 4.4-stable

2001-11-19 Thread Kent Stewart
Ken Gunderson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 02:30:43PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > >> >>W Gerald Hicks wrote: >> >> >>>Can you show me a few lines of context around lines 70 and 217 of >>>/usr/local/include/libxml2/libxml/globals.h ? >>> >> >>The problem isn't in globals. It is in >>/usr/

Re: prism2 128 bit wep keys?

2001-11-19 Thread Barney Wolff
Are you quite sure the Linksys access point supports 128-bit keys? On mine, the box said yes but the documentation, what there was of it, seemed to say no. I didn't look very hard but remember being rather annoyed. On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:52:21PM -0800, Nick Sayer wrote: > Peter Radcliffe wro

Re: unknown kernel error message

2001-11-19 Thread James McNaughton
Brian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After someone suggested that Mandrake Linux can send the arp for type 0800 > on occasion, I got a tcpdump running when my wifes laptop shutdown this > evening: > > nivomede# tcpdump -lenx arp > tcpdump: listening on fxp0 > 21:30:47.609116 0:10:a4:b8:9