RES: Access disallowed through ssh

2001-09-03 Thread Conrado Vardanega
My hosts.allow's first line is: ALL : ALL : allow Therefore, i guess it couldn't be this, according to hosts.allow comments: "first match wins". []s... -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2001-09-03 at 23:03:20 Conrado Vardanega wrote: CV> "Received disconnect from 200.193.xx.xx

Re: Access disallowed through ssh

2001-09-03 Thread Dimitry Andric
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2001-09-03 at 23:03:20 Conrado Vardanega wrote: CV> "Received disconnect from 200.193.xx.xx: 2: Sorry, you are not allowed to CV> connect." - --snip-- CV> This began sometime with no apparent changes to the system. The hosts.allow CV> is default,

Re: Access disallowed through ssh

2001-09-03 Thread Conrado Vardanega
This is the first uncommented line: ALL : ALL : allow On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 06:03:20PM -0300, Conrado Vardanega wrote: > I've a small network, from which I can ssh to my local server, which is > 192.168.3.1/24. > > >From any other IP addresses, however, I'm having access disallowed, getting >

Re: Access disallowed through ssh

2001-09-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 06:03:20PM -0300, Conrado Vardanega wrote: > I've a small network, from which I can ssh to my local server, which is > 192.168.3.1/24. > > >From any other IP addresses, however, I'm having access disallowed, getting > the following message: > > "Received disconnect from 2

Re: make update dies because it cannot find pod2man..

2001-09-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 06:11:11PM +, Lanny Baron wrote: > Hi, > I have an ongoing problem which I have tried to fix, but persists. Whether > make update is run from a script from a crontab (as in a weekly job) or by > cd /usr/src; make update > > The update fails when it runs the Makefil

Re: cputype=486

2001-09-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 09:47:02AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 01:38:26AM +0200, Eric Masson wrote: > > > "Marcel" == Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Marcel> You simply assumed that different processor models within the > > Marcel> same arch

Access disallowed through ssh

2001-09-03 Thread Conrado Vardanega
I've a small network, from which I can ssh to my local server, which is 192.168.3.1/24. >From any other IP addresses, however, I'm having access disallowed, getting the following message: "Received disconnect from 200.193.xx.xx: 2: Sorry, you are not allowed to connect." Note: 200.193.xx.xx is

4.3-20010903-STABLE can't install on SONY Laptop

2001-09-03 Thread Bernardo Lam
Tried to install from floppies, the machine reboots by itself while probing devices. Had a CVSUP from 08/31 on this same machine, after a make world, the laptop, a Sony VAIO PCG-707 rebooted by itself while probing devices (same as with today's snapshot). Any ideas? It worked fine with 4.3-20

RE: RAID5

2001-09-03 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Chris BeHanna wrote: >AFAIK, there are no IDE RAID cards that support RAID-5. You are >stuck with RAID 0, 1 or 10. Although these are just fine for what >they are, they don't do what RAID-5 does. RAID-10 is an acceptable >substitute for RAID-5 if you have the money for

Re: user-ppp assigns the address same with already assigned for other clients

2001-09-03 Thread Brian Somers
I've cc'd [EMAIL PROTECTED] in case someone can come up with a quick fix (FreeBSD is about to be released, and this bug has just been exposed) > Dear sir, > > I noticed while building the PPTP server with FreeBSD 4.4-RC, user-ppp > seems that it assigns already assigned address for other

RE: make update dies because it cannot find pod2man..

2001-09-03 Thread Paul A. Howes
I've been having the same problem since the early 4.x days. It is getting really annoying to have to change that file by hand every time I update the system. Does anyone have any idea what is causing this? I would like to get it solved before 4.4 "goes gold". Thanks! -- Paul A. Howes [EMAIL

Re: RAID5

2001-09-03 Thread Chris BeHanna
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Ronan Lucio wrote: > Hi Friends, > > Thanks a lot for your answers. > > Once more to confirm: > So, If I have 3 HDs with 36 Gb each, I will have 72 Gb of > avaliable space and I one of them breake, the computer will > continues working in another one until I have replace it? O