Re: Perl5.6 to be MFC'd for 4.4-RELEASE?

2001-07-30 Thread Anton Berezin
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 10:26:32PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Just curious as to whether this is planned or not, at this point in time? Nope, not in 4.4. =Anton. -- May the tuna salad be with you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the bo

Re: [OT] Re: If you think people use FreeBSD for server, you must'vebeen outta school for long long time!

2001-07-30 Thread Brad Laue
On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Sung Nae Cho wrote: > I've put this message couple days ago, almost a week old! I have been a > FreeBSD user for quite a while and matured enough using this OS in such > way that I no longer seek help but, most of the time, giving help > to newbies who just started using F

Re: Updating RELENG_4_3

2001-07-30 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chris BeHanna writes: : If the suggestion, "leave a small commit-free window around : midnight UTC" is adopted, then you could use -D "00:00:00 UTC" and not : have to worry (although you'd have to translate that to : "[cc]yy.mm.dd.00.00.00" format for cvsup to p

Re: ** HEADS UP **

2001-07-30 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Chad R. Larson" writes: : And I assume there will be a RELENG_4_4 branch forked off at that : point. Yes. The RELENG_4_3 has been somewhat successful in a number of ways. It also has been a little disappointing in other ways. On the whole, however, it is good en

Re: is "stable" "stable"?

2001-07-30 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chris BeHanna writes: : > Then use a point release with the security patches applied. : : I.e., track RELENG_4_3 instead of RELENG_4. Since 4.3 was released, there have been only 9 commits to the 4.3 branch. That's gotta be insanely stable. :-) Warner To Un