Re: building world on a small drive

2001-07-03 Thread Chris Byrnes
> Hello, > > I have a small 1.6GB HD currently running a base install of 4.2-RELEASE. I > would like to upgrade to 4.3-STABLE. Would 800MB be enough to compile > world, if I were to remove /usr/src afterwards? TIA. -- Jonathan I don't think it's necessasry to post a 37-line long signature file to

Re: building world on a small drive

2001-07-03 Thread Christoph Sold
"Jonathan M. Slivko" schrieb: > > Hello, > > I have a small 1.6GB HD currently running a base install of 4.2-RELEASE. I > would like to upgrade to 4.3-STABLE. Would 800MB be enough to compile > world, if I were to remove /usr/src afterwards? Yes. After make world, /usr/obj occupies about 340M

building world on a small drive

2001-07-03 Thread Jonathan M. Slivko
Hello, I have a small 1.6GB HD currently running a base install of 4.2-RELEASE. I would like to upgrade to 4.3-STABLE. Would 800MB be enough to compile world, if I were to remove /usr/src afterwards? TIA. -- Jonathan \|||/ (o

Re: Hard lockups since cvsup'ing Jul 1st. Help!

2001-07-03 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert L Sowders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I took a look at the cvsweb and > noticed that mfs_vfsops.c was marked as removed at version 1.93 4 weeks > ago by phk, It was removed in -current, but not in -stable. A file in CVS can exist in some branches but no

Re: Hard lockups since cvsup'ing Jul 1st. Help!

2001-07-03 Thread John Reynolds~
[ On Monday, July 2, Robert L Sowders wrote: ] > By chance are you using any kind of mfs file system? I was using a mfs > tmp. I commented out the mfs entry in the fstab file and bingo my system > works again. There was a patch submitted my Tor.Egge in another thread > that addressed proble

Re: Hard lockup

2001-07-03 Thread Greg Lehey
On Monday, 2 July 2001 at 15:45:06 -0600, John R. Shannon wrote: > I'm also experiencing the lockups; 4 today since CVSUPing stable this AM. > > /var/run/dmesg.boot: *sigh* We really need to update our documentation. dmesg was once important. In this case it's irrelevant. Can you find any co

Re: Undesirable behaviour of burncd erase

2001-07-03 Thread Francisco Reyes
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Andrew Reilly wrote: > The other disks are masters on each of the two ATA controllers: > > ad0: 6149MB [13328/15/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 > ad1: 6149MB [13328/15/63] at ata1-master UDMA33 > > After producing a non-working CD with burncd, probably because of > the ill-advis

Re: RELENG_4 -> RELENG_4_3

2001-07-03 Thread Rasputin
* Jason Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010703 15:20]: > Over the weekend, I went from RELENG_4 to RELENG_4_3, but I did by wiping my > system partitions (/, /usr, /var) and reinstalling 4.3 from CD-ROM. Then, I > cvsup'd to RELENG_4_3 and the latest ports. I finally reinstalled everything > th

Re: ata2 configuration (urgen)

2001-07-03 Thread Mike Tancsa
Do you have a 3rd hard drive, or a 3rd controller ? The two devices below are the controllers-- old style at that-- and each can normally take two drives. Also, look at LINT. It states, # For older non-PCI systems, these are the lines to use: #device ata0at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14

ata2 configuration (urgen)

2001-07-03 Thread Cheffo Izroda
I have a third HDD on my FreeBSD-4.3 (STABLE) the others devices are : device ata0at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 device ata1at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 what should be ata3 ? My MB can't catch it with PnP so I must specify ata2 what is the irq ?

Re: RELENG_4 -> RELENG_4_3

2001-07-03 Thread Jason Stephenson
Over the weekend, I went from RELENG_4 to RELENG_4_3, but I did by wiping my system partitions (/, /usr, /var) and reinstalling 4.3 from CD-ROM. Then, I cvsup'd to RELENG_4_3 and the latest ports. I finally reinstalled everything that I need from ports. I thought of doing it with a cvsup and d

Re: PANIC in FFS -- Please HELP!

2001-07-03 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 12:23 PM 7/3/01 +0100, Stewart Morgan wrote: >Hi, > > I mailed -stable a while back (see below), but have >had no reply. I'm getting reproducible crashes (on my >machine at least) in ffs_blkpref() when under heavy load. The last time I checked, RAID5 on vinum was still experimental n

RELENG_4 -> RELENG_4_3

2001-07-03 Thread John R. Shannon
Is it possible to sync to RELENG_4_3 on a system already synchronized to STABLE by the usual update path, or do I need to do something different? Will I run into trouble with /dev? Do I need to delete /usr/src before CVSUPing to pickup the files that were updated in RELENG_4 but not in RELENG_4