Re: SSH1 fixed yet?

2001-02-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:24:27PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > sshd -d > > once, and then running sshd. Does sshd -d make any files ? Nope.. I wonder if you were having transient DNS problems which just happened to coincide with this. DNS is the big thing which causes OpenSSH to have problems

Re: Recent network troubles (slow login, resolver, ...)

2001-02-27 Thread Martti Kuparinen
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >I've read that many people have suffered from various problems > >in the last few days with 4.2-STABLE. > > Do you have IPSec in your kernel by chance ? Yes and I read earlier you comment about IPsec so I'll try with it... Martti --- Ericsson Researc

Re: Recent network troubles (slow login, resolver, ...)

2001-02-27 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 08:44 AM 2/28/2001 +0200, Martti Kuparinen wrote: >Hi! > >I've read that many people have suffered from various problems >in the last few days with 4.2-STABLE. Do you have IPSec in your kernel by chance ? ---Mike M

Recent network troubles (slow login, resolver, ...)

2001-02-27 Thread Martti Kuparinen
Hi! I've read that many people have suffered from various problems in the last few days with 4.2-STABLE. I had trouble with ftpd and Apache, someone reported about telnet timeouts, then there was ssh, xterm. I guess all these have one common factor: name resolution. I had major difficulties wit

Re: NIS/YP problems on FBSD 4.2-STABLE

2001-02-27 Thread Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >, Tom writes: > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > > >On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 09:50:48PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > > >> Well, I'm sorry bothering you again with these problems, > > >> but they

Re: named/rsh/sendmail?

2001-02-27 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 11:03 PM 2/27/2001 -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: >Just rebuilt world (last make world was ~10 days ago), and now >I had to add 2 entries to /etc/hosts (even tho the ptrs are in >DNS correctly). Do you have IPSec in your kernel ? It seems to be something in there as I see the same odd behavior

subscribe

2001-02-27 Thread Jeff Bjorklund
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: Whats the difference between -STABLE & -RELEASE?

2001-02-27 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Actually, it just means "RELease ENGineer", e.g. it's a tag put down by the release engineer. Rod Grimes came up with the convention back in 1992 and all subsequent release engineers have followed it. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in t

Re: build sendmail only ?

2001-02-27 Thread Chris Fedde
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:30:11 +0200 Lauri Laupmaa wrote: +-- | Hi | | Lets say we have 4.2-REL system and fresh -STABLE sources, | if and how is it possible to build/install only sendmail and _not_ world | ? | | TIA | | Lauri +-- One could cd into the

Re: Whats the difference between -STABLE & -RELEASE?

2001-02-27 Thread Matthew Emmerton
> John, > > I'm just taking a shot in the dark here by saying RELENG means Release Engine? I've always thought it meant "RELease ENGlish" or "RELeased by ENGineering". -- Matt Emmerton To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

named/rsh/sendmail?

2001-02-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
Just rebuilt world (last make world was ~10 days ago), and now I had to add 2 entries to /etc/hosts (even tho the ptrs are in DNS correctly). I needed to add my own hostname (lerbsd.lerctr.org) to /etc/hosts otherwise sendmail takes a DNS timeout to put up a banner. I needed to add a /etc/hosts

Re: major resolver problems in -STABLE

2001-02-27 Thread Tom
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Martti Kuparinen wrote: > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Martti Kuparinen wrote: > > > I upgraded today our 4.2-STABLE server and now we have major difficulties > > with DNS. For example, when I try to start the web server I see this in > > the logs: > > > > [Tue Feb 27 11:13:40 2001

Re: fxp0: SCB timeout

2001-02-27 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 05:54 PM 2/27/01 +0100, Remy Nonnenmacher wrote: >On 27 Feb, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > At 08:47 AM 2/27/2001 +0100, Remy Nonnenmacher wrote: > >>On 26 Feb, Mark Evenson wrote: > >> > Remy Nonnenmacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> >> this hangs nfs but network keeps going on (with some short pa

Re: fxp0: SCB timeout

2001-02-27 Thread Remy Nonnenmacher
On 27 Feb, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 08:47 AM 2/27/2001 +0100, Remy Nonnenmacher wrote: >>On 26 Feb, Mark Evenson wrote: >> > Remy Nonnenmacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> this hangs nfs but network keeps going on (with some short pauses >> >> anyway). The motherboard is an Intel STL2, running

Re: IPF and IPv6

2001-02-27 Thread Maxime Henrion
Rasputin wrote: > Afternoon people, just wondered if anyone was using ipf > with 6-to-4 tunneling (a la freenet6.net)? freenet6.net does not provide 6to4 tunneling. 6to4 tunelling uses the stf(4) interface and not the gif(4) one. Maxime -- Don't be fooled by cheap finnish imitations ; BSD is t

IPF and IPv6

2001-02-27 Thread Rasputin
Afternoon people, just wondered if anyone was using ipf with 6-to-4 tunneling (a la freenet6.net)? I'm on a dialup (using gifconfig to build a tunnel through tun0), so there are no IPs mentioned in the ruleset, apart from the usual RFC1918 suspects. If I ping6 outbound to www.normos.org, the ret

Re: microuptime() went backwards (50596.915024 -> 50596.895202)

2001-02-27 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
There is nothing in LINT about this. What is it that you are referring too? Tom Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Alexandr A. Listopad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:27 A

Re: KDE

2001-02-27 Thread Jonathan Belson
Hiya > 2.0 has been around for a bit, 2.1 made an appearance last night but > does not build, and least on my machine. For me at least, configure failed since it couldn't find libjpeg6b. This is equivalent to libjpeg AFAIK, but there are pre-build packages available from the kde site and mirro

Re: KDE

2001-02-27 Thread Mike Harding
2.0 has been around for a bit, 2.1 made an appearance last night but does not build, and least on my machine. - Mike H. Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:52:25 + From: Antony T Curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Abacus Polar PLC (UK) X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/pla

Re: KDE

2001-02-27 Thread Jim King
"Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 09:52:25AM +, Antony T Curtis wrote: > > > > Just wondering if KDE 2.x would make an appearence in the FreeBSD 4.3 > > release? > > Since 2.1 was already committed earlier today, the answer to the question > I think you

Re: tcpd?

2001-02-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Andrew J Caines wrote: > > Arnold, > > > How should one go about doing this in FreeBSD-stable? > > Invoke inetd with "inetd -wW", which is the default. > > FreeBSD's inetd is linked to libwrap, so you don't need to change > inetd.conf to run tcpd as you might on other systems. > > Make sure

Re: fxp0: SCB timeout

2001-02-27 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 08:47 AM 2/27/2001 +0100, Remy Nonnenmacher wrote: >On 26 Feb, Mark Evenson wrote: > > Remy Nonnenmacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> this hangs nfs but network keeps going on (with some short pauses > >> anyway). The motherboard is an Intel STL2, running SMP, with integrated > >> 82559 chi

Re: KDE

2001-02-27 Thread Kent Stewart
Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 09:52:25AM +, Antony T Curtis wrote: > > > > Just wondering if KDE 2.x would make an appearence in the FreeBSD 4.3 > > release? > > Since 2.1 was already committed earlier today, the answer to the question > I think you meant to ask is y

Re: major resolver problems in -STABLE

2001-02-27 Thread Martti Kuparinen
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Martti Kuparinen wrote: > I upgraded today our 4.2-STABLE server and now we have major difficulties > with DNS. For example, when I try to start the web server I see this in > the logs: > > [Tue Feb 27 11:13:40 2001] [alert] mod_unique_id: unable to gethostbyname("ws2") I d