I seem to be "memory leak guy" this month ...
Is it normal for rpc.statd to soak up 257M (as reported by top in the
size column)? The "res" column shows 542K.
The machine seems to be functioning just fine otherwise. It just seems a
little unusual.
It's a 4.2-STABLE (Jan 8) machine and it's servic
Sun Jan 28 18:33:27 EST 2001
Hi Andrew,
It has been happening to me only when I pipe things to /dev/console.
Otherwise none of the messages show up. This unfortunately means that
the perl script that I run to tail all.log and pipe info I want to
/dev/console cannot be used as it continuously spi
> > Yeah using the redirect_port option in natd works, but I dont understand
> > why it doesnt work with ipfw... I thought natd might be stopping, but even
> > having the fwd rule before the divert to natd rule doesnt change anything..
> > Dose ipfw fwd even work to remote machines?
>
> Yes, it w
Folks,
Thanks to David Malone and Tony Byrne for their responses concerning this
most most unusual syslogd behaviour.
After the last cvsup on Thursday night, build and install there is no
change in the fit that syslogd throws when started. This is no surprise,
since there is nothing clearly rela
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:25:51PM -0600, Justin W. Pauler wrote:
> I am not sure if this is a command, but if not, I think it would be useful. I
> have often needed to watch output from different commands like df, but I have
> to continously run the command to get the latest amount. I was think
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 11:34:23PM +1100, Kal Torak wrote:
> > > After some more fiddling around, I have noticed that the ipfw rule is
> > > hit, but nothing seems to happen... The data just continues on to the
> > > local port instead of being forwarded to the remote one...
> >
> > Are you sure?
I am not sure if this is a command, but if not, I think it would be useful. I
have often needed to watch output from different commands like df, but I have
to continously run the command to get the latest amount. I was thinking, why
couldn't tail do that? Since it can watch files for changes an
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2001, Mike Atkinson wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Dirk Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Please tweak the lines in the sendmail port:
> > > files/site.config.m4 to build without NETINET6 or without TCPWRAPPERS.
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001, Mike Atkinson wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dirk Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Please tweak the lines in the sendmail port:
> > files/site.config.m4 to build without NETINET6 or without TCPWRAPPERS.
>
> Removing the NETINET6 lines from files/site.config
At 12:40 PM 1/28/01 -0500, Paul A. Howes wrote:
>All-
>
>When I install a machine with a fresh 4.2-RELEASE distro, the "man" command
>works as expected. When I use cvsup to bring the machine up to 4.2-STABLE
>for the first time, man shows every manual page twice. By that, I mean, the
>manual pag
Curiosity is one answer. Another allows somebody to offer multiple
solutions to a problem - each with their own benefits (presumably).
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Gerhard Sittig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 1
All-
When I install a machine with a fresh 4.2-RELEASE distro, the "man" command
works as expected. When I use cvsup to bring the machine up to 4.2-STABLE
for the first time, man shows every manual page twice. By that, I mean, the
manual page displays normally, and instead of exiting back to a
> Ipfw and ipf to my eye (without glasses that is) seem to do pretty much the same
> thing. The same is true for ipnat and natd. Of course there are differences
> between the two (ritgh?).
How do you map with a single rule a pool of private addresses into a pool of
real addresses with natd ? :>
13 matches
Mail list logo
