sysinstall.8 Breaking buildworld

2001-01-10 Thread Crist J. Clark
I had some buildworld failures earlier this week. In src/share/man/man8 the Makefile includes code to get the sysinstall.8 manpage. Since the manpage lives in src/release, this requires that you CVSup src-release. I had not been. This broke buildworld which had worked in the past. sysinstall.8 is

Re: buildworld over nfs failing consistently

2001-01-10 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 11-Jan-01 Crist J. Clark wrote: > Just to make sure, you have been completely nuking the messed up > object tree on the client before these attempts, > ># chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr && rm -rf /usr/obj/usr Yes, FYI rm -rf /usr/obj/usr ; chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr; rm -rf /usr/o

Re: buildworld over nfs failing consistently

2001-01-10 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 10:54:24AM -0500, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: [snip] Just to make sure, you have been completely nuking the messed up object tree on the client before these attempts, # chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr && rm -rf /usr/obj/usr Right? -- Crist J. Clark

Re: wierd errors

2001-01-10 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 11-Jan-01 Gregory Bond wrote: > > Can't you just increase the kern.maxproc sysctl? > Nope, it's readonly, because various kernel internal hash tables are sized on > it. See src/sys/kern/kern_{proc,resource,mib}.c Hmm.. I thought that was changed a while back but I guess not. --- Daniel O

Re: wierd errors

2001-01-10 Thread Gregory Bond
> hrmm, I tried that, same error (that was the first thing I tried actually) Hmm, it may be that the particular program you are building has some kind of error (in build scripts, or makefile, or whatever) that is causing an infinite loop somewhere. Examine the last N lines of output before the

Re: wierd errors

2001-01-10 Thread Gregory Bond
> Can't you just increase the kern.maxproc sysctl? Nope, it's readonly, because various kernel internal hash tables are sized on it. See src/sys/kern/kern_{proc,resource,mib}.c To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: wierd errors

2001-01-10 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 11-Jan-01 Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > hrmm, I tried that, same error (that was the first thing I tried actually) Can't you just increase the kern.maxproc sysctl? --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standard

Re: wierd errors

2001-01-10 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver
hrmm, I tried that, same error (that was the first thing I tried actually) Ken = | Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best NT upgrade| | Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 | | and student at T

Re: wierd errors

2001-01-10 Thread Gregory Bond
> Jan 11 00:56:11 culverk /kernel: proc: table is full > Jan 11 00:56:14 culverk last message repeated 1022 times This says you have run out of process slots in the kernel - running too many jobs. Either run fewer processes (e.g. use "make -j4" rather than "make -j8") or build a new kernel wit

wierd errors

2001-01-10 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver
I got this wierd error from trying to install the latest windowmaker port: Jan 11 00:56:11 culverk /kernel: proc: table is full Jan 11 00:56:14 culverk last message repeated 1022 times I know this isn't supposed to happen... and I've never seen it happen before... any ideas? Ken To Unsubscri

Re: Next release

2001-01-10 Thread Jordan Hubbard
> Good to know. Sorry for the slightly off topic reply to -stable now. > I was going by the fact that the date for 4.2 was not mentioned on the > website (even though I had seen it mentioned in the mailing lists), nor But it IS listed on the web site and has for some time now. Please see http:

/modules

2001-01-10 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
is there a list that describes each of the modules in /modules? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: Next release

2001-01-10 Thread Tim McMillen
On Wednesday January 10, 2001 23:22, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > Actually it says right now on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/ > > that 4.3 will be available in late March. It seems unusual that > > such a precise time would be placed on the release already. I > > think the date > > Not really.

Re: Next release

2001-01-10 Thread opentrax
I'll go even further. Yesterday Apple (http://www.apple.com) anounce the formal release date of March 24, 2001 for OS X. Jessem. On 10 Jan, Jordan Hubbard wrote: >> >> Actually it says right now on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/ >> that 4.3 will be available i