The RFC (1813) says that the exclusive-file-create NFS op passes a
verifier. It says, and I quote:
"One aspect of the NFS version 3 protocol CREATE procedure
warrants particularly careful consideration: the mechanism
introduced to support the reliable exclusive creatio
* Lawrence Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010103 19:10]: writing on the subject
'Problem with Syslog and Stable'
=>I am getting a lot of:
=>
=>Jan 3 16:04:55 frogger syslogd: '/' in "/dev//dev/tty"
=>
=>in /var/log/messages, and my daily run o
Hi
I've seen much of this discussed here but mine seems to break at this
point:
/usr/obj/usr/src/share/doc/usd/13.viref/troff.core
..and with this msg on the console...
Jan 3 18:54:07 alouette /kernel: pid 54505 (troff), uid 0: exited on
signal 11 (core dumped)
Jan 3 18:54:07 alouette /kernel
On 04-Jan-01 Warren Toomey wrote:
> In article by Daniel O'Connor:
> > On 03-Jan-01 Warren Toomey wrote:
> > > # kldload /usr/local/modules/rtc.ko
> > > kldload: can't load /usr/local/modules/rtc.ko: Exec format error
> > >
> > > Is this a 4.2-thing, or have I just done something wrong? I've
In article by Daniel O'Connor:
> On 03-Jan-01 Warren Toomey wrote:
> > # kldload /usr/local/modules/rtc.ko
> > kldload: can't load /usr/local/modules/rtc.ko: Exec format error
> >
> > Is this a 4.2-thing, or have I just done something wrong? I've
> > searched the FreeBSD mail lists for clues,
Dear Greg, Andy, Roman,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:41:19PM +:
> Synopsis: multiple crashes while using vinum
[..]
> State-Changed-Why:
> No feedback from submitter.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=21148
Well, I've sent you stack-traces, with (and alas
Hi,
I've comited a little mistake. I've got a script install and its was
changed one line:
wicontrol -i wi0 -t 6
to
wicontrol -t wi0 -t 6
Our suggestion is "wicontrol" report "invalid option" in cases like this.
Excuse-me,
Paulo.
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Paulo Fragoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We was
Quoting Thomas Seck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> sorry if this is OT for -stable, but I followed the discussion about
> vinum in here and got a bit worried.
>
> I am currently deploying a proxy server for our company. It shall use
> squid on 4.2-STABLE. I would like to put the cache da
Hi,
Attached is the most valuable information that was in my pr 22103.
I've read the vinumdebug and the other guy's PR.
I'm still not getting what is missing.
You told the other guy to submit the backtrace, but it was in fact submitted!
It's as well in my PR as well.
Your responses are very brief
Hi !
I have two boxes running FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE and 4.X-STABLE.
I want to build world on 4.X system and then install it over NFS to 3.1 system.
Is there any pitfalls in this process ? Caveats ?
--
Best regards,
Andrey
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebs
On Wednesday, 3 January 2001 at 10:29:44 +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:01:07PM +0100, Thomas Seck wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> sorry if this is OT for -stable, but I followed the discussion about
>> vinum in here and got a bit worried.
>>
>> I am currently deploying a pro
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:01:07PM +0100, Thomas Seck wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> sorry if this is OT for -stable, but I followed the discussion about
> vinum in here and got a bit worried.
>
> I am currently deploying a proxy server for our company. It shall use
> squid on 4.2-STABLE. I would like
Hi,
> Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > n 2 20:36:57 alouette /kernel: pid 56184 (troff), uid 0: exited on signal
> > 11 (core dumped)
> Signal 11 usually indicates a hardware problem. Have you added any
> memory or changed (or overclocked?) your processor since you last did a
> make world?
ano
Hi all,
I've just added the missing header file to the CVS repository. Please cvsup.
Duncan
On 03-Jan-01 Yuri Vorobyev wrote:
> Hello!
>
>Make world pass normal, but then i try build kernel i got this
>error:
>
> ===> bktr/bktr_mem
> ===> coff
> ===> fpu
> ===> gnufpu
> ===> ibcs2
> =
Hello!
Make world pass normal, but then i try build kernel i got this
error:
===> bktr/bktr_mem
===> coff
===> fpu
===> gnufpu
===> ibcs2
===> linprocfs
===> mly
===> ray
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../include
/usr/src/sys/modules/
On Tuesday, 2 January 2001 at 23:58:26 -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
> Like everything, topologies have their strengths and weaknesses.
> RAID-5 is excellent for read-centric operations (which large data stores
> tend to be, I will note) and, as Poul reminded me a few days ago...
> st
Hi
I'm on the case. I went to bed straight after the commit.
Duncan
On 03-Jan-01 Warner Losh wrote:
> ray was MFC'd earlier today. Looks like a problem. Duncan, I'm sure,
> will fix it when he realizes what is going on (if he hasn't done so
> alread).
>
> Warner
>
---
_
17 matches
Mail list logo