NFSv3 O_EXCL file create - protocol spec & solution (was Re: Bug in NFSv3 client)

2001-01-03 Thread Matt Dillon
The RFC (1813) says that the exclusive-file-create NFS op passes a verifier. It says, and I quote: "One aspect of the NFS version 3 protocol CREATE procedure warrants particularly careful consideration: the mechanism introduced to support the reliable exclusive creatio

Re: Problem with Syslog and Stable

2001-01-03 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Lawrence Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010103 19:10]: writing on the subject 'Problem with Syslog and Stable' =>I am getting a lot of: => =>Jan 3 16:04:55 frogger syslogd: '/' in "/dev//dev/tty" => =>in /var/log/messages, and my daily run o

4.2-STABLE build fails

2001-01-03 Thread Odhiambo Washington
Hi I've seen much of this discussed here but mine seems to break at this point: /usr/obj/usr/src/share/doc/usd/13.viref/troff.core ..and with this msg on the console... Jan 3 18:54:07 alouette /kernel: pid 54505 (troff), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Jan 3 18:54:07 alouette /kernel

Re: kldload: Exec format error, is 4.2 problem?

2001-01-03 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 04-Jan-01 Warren Toomey wrote: > In article by Daniel O'Connor: > > On 03-Jan-01 Warren Toomey wrote: > > > # kldload /usr/local/modules/rtc.ko > > > kldload: can't load /usr/local/modules/rtc.ko: Exec format error > > > > > > Is this a 4.2-thing, or have I just done something wrong? I've

Re: kldload: Exec format error, is 4.2 problem?

2001-01-03 Thread Warren Toomey
In article by Daniel O'Connor: > On 03-Jan-01 Warren Toomey wrote: > > # kldload /usr/local/modules/rtc.ko > > kldload: can't load /usr/local/modules/rtc.ko: Exec format error > > > > Is this a 4.2-thing, or have I just done something wrong? I've > > searched the FreeBSD mail lists for clues,

Re: kern/21148: multiple crashes while using vinum

2001-01-03 Thread Daniel Lang
Dear Greg, Andy, Roman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:41:19PM +: > Synopsis: multiple crashes while using vinum [..] > State-Changed-Why: > No feedback from submitter. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=21148 Well, I've sent you stack-traces, with (and alas

Re: wi0 or isab0 trouble?

2001-01-03 Thread Paulo Fragoso
Hi, I've comited a little mistake. I've got a script install and its was changed one line: wicontrol -i wi0 -t 6 to wicontrol -t wi0 -t 6 Our suggestion is "wicontrol" report "invalid option" in cases like this. Excuse-me, Paulo. On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Paulo Fragoso wrote: > Hi, > > We was

Re: Vinum safe to use for raid 0?

2001-01-03 Thread Roman Shterenzon
Quoting Thomas Seck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi all, > > sorry if this is OT for -stable, but I followed the discussion about > vinum in here and got a bit worried. > > I am currently deploying a proxy server for our company. It shall use > squid on 4.2-STABLE. I would like to put the cache da

Vinum saga continues

2001-01-03 Thread Roman Shterenzon
Hi, Attached is the most valuable information that was in my pr 22103. I've read the vinumdebug and the other guy's PR. I'm still not getting what is missing. You told the other guy to submit the backtrace, but it was in fact submitted! It's as well in my PR as well. Your responses are very brief

3.1 -> 4-S via NFS

2001-01-03 Thread Andrey Lakhno
Hi ! I have two boxes running FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE and 4.X-STABLE. I want to build world on 4.X system and then install it over NFS to 3.1 system. Is there any pitfalls in this process ? Caveats ? -- Best regards, Andrey To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebs

Re: Vinum safe to use for raid 0?

2001-01-03 Thread Greg Lehey
On Wednesday, 3 January 2001 at 10:29:44 +, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:01:07PM +0100, Thomas Seck wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> sorry if this is OT for -stable, but I followed the discussion about >> vinum in here and got a bit worried. >> >> I am currently deploying a pro

Re: Vinum safe to use for raid 0?

2001-01-03 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:01:07PM +0100, Thomas Seck wrote: > Hi all, > > sorry if this is OT for -stable, but I followed the discussion about > vinum in here and got a bit worried. > > I am currently deploying a proxy server for our company. It shall use > squid on 4.2-STABLE. I would like

Re: Help Update

2001-01-03 Thread Wolfgang Zenker
Hi, > Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > n 2 20:36:57 alouette /kernel: pid 56184 (troff), uid 0: exited on signal > > 11 (core dumped) > Signal 11 usually indicates a hardware problem. Have you added any > memory or changed (or overclocked?) your processor since you last did a > make world? ano

RE: can't build kernel - if_raymib.h missing

2001-01-03 Thread Duncan Barclay
Hi all, I've just added the missing header file to the CVS repository. Please cvsup. Duncan On 03-Jan-01 Yuri Vorobyev wrote: > Hello! > >Make world pass normal, but then i try build kernel i got this >error: > > ===> bktr/bktr_mem > ===> coff > ===> fpu > ===> gnufpu > ===> ibcs2 > =

can't build kernel

2001-01-03 Thread Yuri Vorobyev
Hello! Make world pass normal, but then i try build kernel i got this error: ===> bktr/bktr_mem ===> coff ===> fpu ===> gnufpu ===> ibcs2 ===> linprocfs ===> mly ===> ray rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../include /usr/src/sys/modules/

Re: RAID costs (was: Vinum safe to use for raid 0?)

2001-01-03 Thread Greg Lehey
On Tuesday, 2 January 2001 at 23:58:26 -0800, Matt Dillon wrote: > Like everything, topologies have their strengths and weaknesses. > RAID-5 is excellent for read-centric operations (which large data stores > tend to be, I will note) and, as Poul reminded me a few days ago... > st

Re: 4.2-STABLE broken build? (Recent commit)

2001-01-03 Thread Duncan Barclay
Hi I'm on the case. I went to bed straight after the commit. Duncan On 03-Jan-01 Warner Losh wrote: > ray was MFC'd earlier today. Looks like a problem. Duncan, I'm sure, > will fix it when he realizes what is going on (if he hasn't done so > alread). > > Warner > --- _