David W. Chapman Jr.:
>The problem is netscape itself, since it comes in binary format, anyone who
>ports it doesn't have a choice into which format, I believe the bsdi version
>of netscape is elf, but I'm not totally sure.
It is, and the BSDI binary runs just smoothly on FreeBSD. The only issue
> Donn Miller wrote:
> While this is true, the GENERIC kernel is supposed to support as much
> hardware "out of the box" as possible, so a user can install and not
> have to worry about setting up devices...
So a user can *install* and not have to worry about setting up devices.
You don't need a
Title: Oldies Online Casino - Happy New Year!!!
Oldies
Online
Casino
Would like to
welcome
you and your family a Happy New Year!
We Would also like
to offer ALL NEW & EXISTING Members a
Holiday 25% Bonus
Oldies Online
Casino offers Free no download Flash Internet
gam
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 12:04:17AM -0500, Donn Miller scribbled:
| "Michael C . Wu" wrote:
| FreeBSD is most often used as a server, not a desktop. Why exactly is
| sound needed for a first install? If nothing else, PCM could be loaded
| via a kernel module. Optional stuff usually should not be
Maarten van Schie wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Kal Torak wrote:
>
> > Maarten van Schie wrote:
> > >
> > > You guys talk about a 'duel boot'. But as far as I go a duel is an
> > > opposition. It should be 'dual' caused by the composition.
> >
> >
> > That might be a nice situation, but as soon
Donn Miller wrote:
>
> "Michael C . Wu" wrote:
>
> > "Fully functional" for a desktop implies a working sound card too.
> > This is one of of those things that does not really matter very much.
> > A good server admin will recompile and customize his kernel.
> > And a desktop user probably does
"Michael C . Wu" wrote:
> "Fully functional" for a desktop implies a working sound card too.
> This is one of of those things that does not really matter very much.
> A good server admin will recompile and customize his kernel.
> And a desktop user probably does not know how to compile a kernel.
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Kal Torak wrote:
> Maarten van Schie wrote:
> >
> > You guys talk about a 'duel boot'. But as far as I go a duel is an
> > opposition. It should be 'dual' caused by the composition.
>
>
> That might be a nice situation, but as soon as there is more than one
> O/S on a system
Maarten van Schie wrote:
>
> You guys talk about a 'duel boot'. But as far as I go a duel is an
> opposition. It should be 'dual' caused by the composition.
That might be a nice situation, but as soon as there is more than one
O/S on a system they are both fighting for control, take as a prime
You guys talk about a 'duel boot'. But as far as I go a duel is an
opposition. It should be 'dual' caused by the composition.
Maarten.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, 29 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > [...snip of questions I leave for others...]
> > > >
> > > >Does anyone know the MS/IBM approved codes for the various types
> > > >
> > > >6 = DOS FAT16
> > > >
11 matches
Mail list logo
