It seems Andrew Reilly wrote:
>
> Nov 5 12:35:40 gurney /kernel: FreeBSD 4.2-BETA #0: Sun Nov 5 10:15:56 EST 200
> Nov 14 14:39:32 gurney /kernel: FreeBSD 4.2-BETA #0: Mon Nov 13 14:15:20 EST 200
Uhm, seems to me that this is the same source being built or what ??
Upgrade to at least 4.2-RE
Hi,
I know no-one else has kicked up a rumpus about this, so I assume
that this is a problem with my configuration. I have a FreeBSD
box that I track -STABLE with. I don't use my CD-ROM much, but
recently discovered that it isn't working. In fact, checking
dmesg showed that it isn't being dete
It seems [Ivan Debn_r] wrote:
[Charset iso-8859-2 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> I'm just looking at the disk partitions, and the first 63 sectors are by
> default marked as unused. So is it really nescessary to have the ofset in
> the ar driver for HPT?
This has been changed in both -curr
Hi, Otter:
Thanks for your reply. That's what I though. Now I just wonder that
revision _0 (the default installation with 4.2-stable) is more secure and
stable than the latest revision (currently _6)?
If I want to upgrade the XFree86-3.3.6_6 from 3.3.6_0, can I do that by
using package or shou
Some have said that 3.3.36 is more stable and secure. That's why it's
packaged with the CD. Personally, I prefer 4 since it runs lighter on
my old laptop. Since I run it behind the firewall, and all the
machines here are trusted, it's not a big concern for me. But that's
my choice. You need to mak
Hi, All:
I just installed 4.2-stable-20001211 along with Xfree86. Which XFree86
version comes with 4.2-stable? Mine is Xfree86-3.3.6 (it's about two
years old version and it recognizes the box as FBSD-3.3-Release i386
(ELF)) and some of packages can't be installed because of dependency
compatib
Rémi Guyomarch wrote:
> Without 'quick' in 'head' rules, ipf will process the entiere group 10
> rules, and will continue with the next, non-group rule (the first rule
> in [...some other rules...]).
> Yes, you can achieve the same thing with 'skipto' but at some point
> you will start to have
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> How come that all kewl features, such as sessionlimits, idletimes, etc all
> are documented in man login.conf(5), but never seemed to work? It's 4.2
> already, and it still doesn't make any difference?
One thought springs to mind, did you run
ca
In article <913bgg$j34$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kenneth Mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hey,
>
>I remember seeing something in the GCC snapshots that the optimization
bug
>was fixed. You should test with GCC 2.95.2 with a clean environment and
>document exactly your setup and procedures for testing
Hi:
This is my current situation:
To configure XFree86-4.0.1_10, I use XFree86 -configure and it says:
>...
>XFree86 detected your mouse at device /dev/mouse. Please check your config if the
>mouse is still not operational,
as >by default XFree86 tried to autodetect the protocol.
>
>Your XF86
10 matches
Mail list logo
