On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 09:18:01AM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
> On a -stable system from October 31, I'm seeing this from sockstat:
I get the same on my Nov 5th Alpha -current box, but not on my Nov 5th
-current i386 box. Also on my Oct 31st 4.1.1-STABLE Alpha box.
I would say it is an Alpha pr
>>Itojun, do you agree with this? What problems did you see in merging the
>>bugfix into FreeBSD? Maybe I missed something.
> please DO test the new fix and report.
> otherwise i don't feel like bringing it in.
on a second thought, if the time constraint is critical, go ahead
When I run X on console, the mouse pointer does not show up in the
Xterminal. Output from 'uname -a':
FreeBSD thor.diwans.net 4.2-BETA FreeBSD 4.2-BETA #0: Wed Nov 8 00:54:45 EST 2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SERVER i386
The moues shows fine in non-X and the device is set as /dev/
I was wondering if there was a way to keep up to date without using CVS or
one of the other tools. CVSSUP is fine at work for the servers here but
could be v painful down a 56K modem ;-)
I can burn data onto CD's at work and take them home, what would I need to
download? I know that there is d
It's that darned AUXRELEASETAG hack that ports and apparently now docs
depend on. :-(
If I leave AUXRELEASETAG unset and build the release with
RELEASETAG=RELENG_4, as I must for all BETAs and interim release
candidate snapshots for which I have no tags, then -current ports and
doc is used. Unfo
> : rshdauthrequiredpam_deny.so
> : to
> : rshdauthsufficient pam_deny.so
> :
> : fixes the problem.
> :
> : Should this be changed in CVS or is there some reason why it should remain
> : 'required'?
>
> I think it should be changed back. We're going to get a lot of
> ques
> I would like to make it clear that Jordan approved this MFC _well_
> before 4.2-RC and that I have no evidence that he would have allowed the
> awk upgrade this late in the game.
That is correct. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in
Michael Grant wrote:
> So, if I suck down RELENG_4 today, what do I get? 4.2beta or 4.1.1?
If you ask for RELENG_4, you get RELENG_4. The names like
"4.1-RELEASE," "4.2-BETA," etc. are just labels that refer to specific
points in time along the RELENG_4 development cycle timeline.
HTH
[ don't cross post, followups to hackers (was on stable) ]
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:23:27AM +, Kaltashkin Eugene wrote:
> #netstat -m
> 567/2176/4096 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
> 317 mbufs allocated to data
> 250 mbufs allocated to packet headers
> 296/1024/1024 mbuf
Hi ppls
Today i get message looutput: mbuf allocation error
#netstat -m
567/2176/4096 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
317 mbufs allocated to data
250 mbufs allocated to packet headers
296/1024/1024 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
where i can increase amount of mbuf ?
sy
Hi folks,
Thanks to those of you who mailed me feedback. All the feedback
suggests that it's not as simple as syncing the awk sources up to HEAD.
Therefore, there's just no way this is going to happen for 4.2-RELEASE.
As an aside, someone mailed me his concerns that Jordan was still
consider
11 matches
Mail list logo
