On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 12:01:09PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> ===> Cleaning for tidy-2804
> ===> Cleaning for w3m-0.1.11.p.17
> ===> Cleaning for docproj-1.1
> make: don't know how to make all. Stop
> *** Error code 2
>
> Stop in /usr/src/release.
> *** Error code 1
>
> I'm going to h
> Regarding the -j option, I seem to remember someone telling me that
> option was only for make buildworld/installworld and not the modules
> or anything else.
This information is outdated I believe. This used to be true however, I can
attest to having built 4.x worlds with -j 4 many times.
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 12:01:09PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> ===> Cleaning for tidy-2804
> ===> Cleaning for w3m-0.1.11.p.17
> ===> Cleaning for docproj-1.1
> make: don't know how to make all. Stop
> *** Error code 2
>
> Stop in /usr/src/release.
> *** Error code 1
>
> I'm going to h
Greetings,
Thanks for the update. My pleasure to work on it, really.
Anyway, I looked into the files is /usr/ports/Mk and realised
that there are others prefixes too like -esound, -glib, ...
then there are more stuff like apache/mod_ssl/php ... It gets
way complicatd.
Glad to kno
Please see:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/4.2-RC1-install.iso
For an installatable ISO image with packages and XFree86 3.3.6 bits
(MD5 checksum is in CHECKSUM.MD5 in the same directory).
The FTP installable version is also uploading to the FTP site and
will be avail
* Marko Cuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001108 01:52] wrote:
>
>
> Roman Shterenzon wrote:
>
> >
> > I've a perfectly good PR about vinum (panics) open. There's no even single
> > follow up (kern/22103).
> > I couldn't stand it any longer, so I'm not able to recreate it since I'm
> > using raid1 on th
On Tue, 07 Nov 2000 23:08:12 -0500
Michael DeMutis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yikes, I'm lost.
>
> I had always thought that the RELENG_4 tag was always going to carry the
> 4.x-STABLE name. And that the BETA was really 4.x-CURRENT ? What happened
> to CURRENT or has it been done away with?
Roman Shterenzon wrote:
>
> I've a perfectly good PR about vinum (panics) open. There's no even single
> follow up (kern/22103).
> I couldn't stand it any longer, so I'm not able to recreate it since I'm
> using raid1 on those disks now. I waited for almost one month but
> aparently nothing was
"Crist J . Clark" wrote:
>
>
> Details please? The natd(8) process is not actually started from
> rc.firewall, but from rc.network. In which of these is the supposed
> breakage? Or do you mean the divert(4) rule in rc.firewall is not
> being added properly?
That's right !
> Could you post the
Hello!
I have 4.1.1-RELEASE box.
Recently I'v got a few rebooting on my FreeBSD box for a day. After some
investigation I discover one my user had reach inode limit and when he tried
write some file crash happened.
After the user removed some files crashings had stop.
I looked for PR, and found
If y understand, there is a window where you have new userland and old kernel.
I have experienced big problems (even panics) with these mixings in the
transition 4.1 -> 4.2 It seeems that things have changed so much that
userland utilities can even panic mismatched kernels.
Reboot single user, wi
Hi all,
I apologize if this is the wrong place to ask such questions. I've tried
to ask in freebsd-questions, but no one ever replied.
The disklabel output is as follows:
root@dns :~# disklabel ad1
# /dev/ad1c:
type: unknown
disk: amnesiac
label:
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
track
12 matches
Mail list logo
