RE: "profiling timer expired" on new kernel builds in 4.1-R and4.1-S

Hi all, I mostly always see this error message (Profiling timer expired) when I try to dump a large MySQL database with the mysqldump comamnd. I have no clue how to fix this, and I would greatly appreciate any hint on this subject. Thanks, Noor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Perl Doesn't like XFree-4.0.1

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ryan Losh writes: : that "THIS is where the LC_CTYPE is being set." Therefore, I need to : read the FreeBSD handbook and see how one goes about reporting a bug : in the ports (gnomelibs-1.2.4, to be exact). I am not an expert, but Short answer: cd /usr/ports/*/gn

Re: Perl Doesn't like XFree-4.0.1

imp> could be the X server. To see if this is the case, use the following imp> .xinitrc: imp>#!/bin/sh imp>xterm imp> and then do a printenv. I kinda doubt it as I don't see this on my imp> systems here, but I use XFree86 3.3.6. imp> Yes, I don't see it (LC_CTYPE) either... imp> Seco

Re: "profiling timer expired" on new kernel builds in 4.1-R and4.1-S

> > I'm running a Dell Dimension P-II 400MHz, 384MB RAM, 18GB SCSI on a > > Qlogic card. > > Aha! I have a Qlogic ISP1040 SCSI card. I think we have a suspect ... > I use a Qlogic 1040B (FW-SE). Can anyone on the distribution lend a light to a link between the profiling errors and Qlogic (o

Re: XFree86 4 and DRI with voodoo3

Wow! I loved being proved wrong. So do you need a kernel module for that to work? Just agpart? Any documentation you looked at for this? --David Bushong On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 10:23:13PM -0400, Coleman Kane wrote: > Two possibilities: > 1) You are not loading the tdfx.ko that can be built f

Re: Odd Load average problem

For what it's worth, I see this occasionally on my laptop. It seems to be amd and/or some NFS activity that kicks up the load-average to 1. It comes back down after a while so I haven't cared to get any further into it. As usual, I Could Be Wrong. -- Parag Patel To Unsubscribe: sen

Re: NO_TCSH issue

On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:54:17PM -0700, Eric P. Scott wrote: > What individuals choose as defaults for their personal accounts > is their business. I don't see a problem with having sh, ksh, > zsh, bash, csh, tcsh, _whatever_ available. But I stand by my > opinion that replacing csh with tcsh

floppy drive

Hello, I have just discovered a strange problem on my new PC. The mother board is an Abit KT7 hosting a Duron with Via chipset. I can triple boot FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE (stock GENERIC kernel) Linux and Win98. Problem: under freebsd i cannot run fdformat fd0. Immediately bad crc errors appear, only

Re: Which release of 4.1 supports i810 with XFree86 4.0.1?

On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:33:05PM -0700, Doug White wrote: > On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Alan Bindemann wrote: > > > >From: Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Don't expect to get lots of help for this; XFree86 4 is very, very beta > > >and has lots of nasty bugs. [snip] > > > > > >I suggest using 3.3.6

HEADS UP: RSA liberated

The native OpenSSL implementation of RSA has been activated by default in -stable, meaning rsaref and librsaUSA are no longer required, and new installs will be able to make use of openssh in ssh1 mode by default. Basically, the situation for US people has caught up with what international folk h

Re: Which release of 4.1 supports i810 with XFree86 4.0.1?

Alan Bindemann wrote: > > >From: Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Don't expect to get lots of help for this; XFree86 4 is very, very beta > >and has lots of nasty bugs. [snip] > > > >I suggest using 3.3.6 for production use. > > I was under the impression that the i810 chipset was not supported

Re: NO_TCSH issue

On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Eric P. Scott wrote: > [Neil Blakey-Milner] > >tcsh is fully csh-compatible. > > No, it isn't. And not including a 44bsd-csh package on > 4.1-RELEASE's CD #1 (note that 44bsd-more is there) was downright > malicious. Yes, we did it to deliberately screw with your life. :-)