Mark Ovens wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 10:49:12AM -0700, John Reynolds~ wrote:
> >
> > [ On Wednesday, August 2, Warner Losh wrote: ]
> > > : I am not in favour of putting *that* in UPDATING. Either suggest an
> > > : appropriate entry in /boot/loader.conf:
> > >
> > > Actually, make ins
> : comment out the PARANOID line in /etc/hosts.allow?
> : #ALL : PARANOID : RFC931 20 : deny
> Yes. This PARANOID option is really quite silly since RFC 931 is
> useless outside of your own administrative domain and off dubious
> value inside it. Best to leave it commented out.
> Warner
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
hi there,
i recently tried to install an 4.1-REL (2 Floppies) on an dual i386 SCSI
HD 1/2 gig RAM over FTP and chose the expert mode or whatever it is called
again in the Installation-Menu. However everything went just fine, but
after a reboot the bootloader jus
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 10:49:12AM -0700, John Reynolds~ wrote:
>
> [ On Wednesday, August 2, Warner Losh wrote: ]
> > : I am not in favour of putting *that* in UPDATING. Either suggest an
> > : appropriate entry in /boot/loader.conf:
> >
> > Actually, make installkernel was fixed so that you do
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, [gill] wrote:
> check ps -ax to make sure the daemon is up
They are (syslogd and sshd).
> run the daemon /usr/local/sbin/sshd -d and watch the debug info
> run the client ssh -v for verbose
I'll try this and play around a little more tonight.
> are you running 4.0-RELEASE
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Williams writes:
> : > : That's wrong. 'shutdown now' takes you to single user mode. 'shutdow
> n -r now'
> : > : will make it reboot.
> : >
> : > That's changed since the last time I did shutdown then :-). Of
> : > course, that was 5 years ago or so...
>
Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
>
> Marcel's changes mean that you the tools you use to install the world
> are ones that you can run with the old kernel. However, once they're
> installed, you may not be able to run the new binaries with the old
> kernel. In all, you "should" boot the kernel, and yo
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 17:40 -0400, Nader Turki wrote:
>
> I just installed FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE. Well, I got this new
> thing that's called IPv6 older versions of FreeBSD never asked
> me that before. Anyway I said YES and hope that's not gonna
> casue me any trouble. 'cause i have no idea what
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Williams writes:
: > : That's wrong. 'shutdown now' takes you to single user mode. 'shutdown -r now'
: > : will make it reboot.
: >
: > That's changed since the last time I did shutdown then :-). Of
: > course, that was 5 years ago or so...
:
: It's been th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Williams writes:
: Warner, I think you are confused. 'shutdown now' takes you to single
: user mode. 'halt' will take you to the above prompt.
I was confused between shutdown now and shutdown -h now.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Hmmm, show this to your linux buddies
http://www.rewls.nu/takeittux.jpg
Jason Kasper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/02/2000 01:55 PM
Please respond to freebsd-stable
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Irda support
I realize this may
Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
>
> obrien> However, today's buildworld is more resilent having better
> obrien> build-tools, etc.. targets than when release/Makefile was
> obrien> first written. Maybe this need could be removed. But this
> obrien> hasn't happened yet.
>
> If I understand the facts o
> : That's wrong. 'shutdown now' takes you to single user mode. 'shutdown -r now'
> : will make it reboot.
>
> That's changed since the last time I did shutdown then :-). Of
> course, that was 5 years ago or so...
It's been that way since 4.3BSD, at least. Not sure which OS you were
using at
> : > : [1]
> : > : --> reboot <--
> : > :
> : [...]
> : > : This line should be "shutdown now", isn't it? Any further suggestions to
> : > : make life of Warner easier?
> : >
> : > No. It should be "reboot" since that's the simplest thing. "shutdown
> : > now" do
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 11:42:50AM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> > I cvsup-ed all src collections, including ports and doc (i.e. src-all,
> > doc-all and ports-all).
...
> > Wich path should I give to CVSROOT dir ?
>
> You need to download the the cvs collections, not the "checked-out"
> colle
Hi,
> I cvsup-ed all src collections, including ports and doc (i.e. src-all, doc-all and
>ports-all).
You should fetch cvs collection.
Btw, I missed to find, that "make buildworld" is mandatory before make
release (It failed in several places, if I didn't build the
world). Therefore, during make
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cvsup-ed all src collections, including ports and doc (i.e. src-all, doc-all and
>ports-all).
>
> I went to /usr/src/release and tried to "make release". It asked me to provide
>CVSROOT variable. And oops.. I am confused ... :-)
>
> Wi
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:23:13AM -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote:
> SLOW DOWN!
>
> "make release" will make the iso images (right?)
no, make release make only ftp,cd-version of install tree, no image
>
> What he wants, I suspect, is to cd to /usr/src and follow the
> instruct
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 01:34:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I cvsup-ed all src collections, including ports and doc (i.e. src-all,
> > doc-all and ports-all).
> >
> > I went to /usr/src/release and tried to "make release". It a
Matt Heckaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> *nods* It still breaks wmstock though, it never sees itself as getting the
> complete file and errors out, and keeps on trying making temporary files
> that it never knows are correct :) Thank you for the quick diagnoses
> though, it's appreciated.
Quic
Johan Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This has been taken care of in current but in a slightly different way.
> When using the build/installkernel targets the built / installed kernel
> is named 'kernel'
> Hence, when these changes are MFC:ed this part is not needed at all in
> UPDATING.
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 01:34:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cvsup-ed all src collections, including ports and doc (i.e. src-all,
> doc-all and ports-all).
>
> I went to /usr/src/release and tried to "make release". It asked me to
> provide CVSROOT variable. And oops.. I am conf
Hi,
I cvsup-ed all src collections, including ports and doc (i.e. src-all, doc-all and
ports-all).
I went to /usr/src/release and tried to "make release". It asked me to provide CVSROOT
variable. And oops.. I am confused ... :-)
Wich path should I give to CVSROOT dir ?
Any documentation reg
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 11:47:33PM -0400, Coleman Kane wrote:
> Still, this is no excuse for changing the port without asking the
> maintainer Obviously, something's amiss.
I compiled it yesterday on my 4.1-STABLE at home, and it would fail
with some really obscure messages. After a bit of lookin
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 09:16:46PM -0700, Crist J . Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 02:03:57PM -0600, Chris Fedde wrote:
> > My point is that there is a perfectly good mechinism in existance to allow
> > switching between MTA. The rc.conf mechinism works well and is consistant
> > for all
At 02 Aug 2000 09:58:04 +0200, Roland Jesse wrote:
> Siegbert Baude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ---Begin Suggestion---
>
> Not bad, but:
>
> > # Verify that the new kernel works, it will be installed as
> > # /YOUR_KERNEL_HERE
> > chflags noschg /kernel
> >
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actualy, I don't have 'login failers'. I just can't
> connect! "Connection refused", not login failer! I do not get login
> prompt at all!
Correct... However, per inetd(8), wrapped services log failed attempts
using the auth syslog facility.
> 'hos
27 matches
Mail list logo
