--- Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Richard Stanaford wrote:
> The usual problem is that you install a new kernel, but not the rest of
> the world. If that is indead what you've done, fix that first before
> worrying about anythig else.
>
> Tom
>
I did say this happene
Tom wrote:
>
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Richard Stanaford wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have been carousing the mailing lists, both -stable and -questions, and I
> > have not found a definitive answer for this problem...
> >
> > PROBLEM : top (among others) is broken after going to STABLE.
> >
> > I
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> "Thomas R. Stromberg" wrote:
> >
> > Does someone plan on upgrading the StarOffice port to 5.2 before the
> > 4.1-RELEASE? I think with all of the hype surrounding SO52 it might be a
> > good idea to put it in ports, even if it installs pretty cleanly without
> > it.
>
Antony T Curtis wrote:
>
> John Baldwin wrote:
>
>
>
> > While the newer X bits have several advantages such as being 4.1 binaries
> > rather than 3.x binaries and supporting the i810, they most likely won't be
> > used if I cannot resolve the PC98 issue in the next day or so. Please test
>
Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 23:05:07 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Please test this out and give us feedback.
>
> On "configure mouse" sysinstal screen the text suggests to "select 4
> to disable mouse", but the "Disable" is item 6, not 4.
>
> SY, Uwe
Thanks! Fixed in
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 23:05:07 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> Please test this out and give us feedback.
On "configure mouse" sysinstal screen the text suggests to "select 4
to disable mouse", but the "Disable" is item 6, not 4.
SY, Uwe
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Zu Gr
"Thomas R. Stromberg" wrote:
>
> Does someone plan on upgrading the StarOffice port to 5.2 before the
> 4.1-RELEASE? I think with all of the hype surrounding SO52 it might be a
> good idea to put it in ports, even if it installs pretty cleanly without
> it.
The ports collection is already labele
On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Richard Stanaford wrote:
> All,
>
> I have been carousing the mailing lists, both -stable and -questions, and I
> have not found a definitive answer for this problem...
>
> PROBLEM : top (among others) is broken after going to STABLE.
>
> I know this is a FAQ. What is the
All,
I have been carousing the mailing lists, both -stable and -questions, and I
have not found a definitive answer for this problem...
PROBLEM : top (among others) is broken after going to STABLE.
I know this is a FAQ. What is the preferred method for fixing this? Should I
implement the patc
cvsupped 10 min ago, on PIII-650 box (ASUS, VIA)/Matrox/Adaptec
29160/3C905C-TX/WD91 ULTRA2.
make buildword broke, with signal 11. Isn't 11 a h/w issue?
Thanks
-philippe
===> doc
===> cc1obj
cc -O -pipe -DFREEBSD_NATIVE -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-DPREFIX=\"/usr/obj/usr/src/i
386/usr\" -I/usr/
Does someone plan on upgrading the StarOffice port to 5.2 before the
4.1-RELEASE? I think with all of the hype surrounding SO52 it might be a
good idea to put it in ports, even if it installs pretty cleanly without
it.
I plan to do a desktop rollout of 4.1, and Im sure the users would
appreciate
On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 02:26:33PM -0500, kent wrote:
> Have you tried reinstalling from the ports since you upgraded to
> 4-stable?
---end quoted text---
Just installed the native xfstt port and it works fine.
I'll see how it goes. Originally I was told by the maintainer to use the
Linux rpm
> At 12:53 PM 7/21/00 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >Note also that OC'ing can cause _permanent_ damage to semiconductors,
> >and that clocking down to spec may still leave you with hardware that
> >does not function correctly. The predominant failure mode is caused
> >by something called elec
An SMTP stream claimed that Kazutaka YOKOTA muttered:
> As far as I know, this is a hardware glitch often seen with the
> stick-shaped pointing device found on many notebook computers. The
> stick appears to be generating the "down" signal even when it is
> supposed to be in the "neutral" positi
14 matches
Mail list logo
