/modules/ empty in 4.x snaps

2000-07-17 Thread John Hay
I see that the /modules directory is empty in the latest 4.x snaps. John -- John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: bioscall.s

2000-07-17 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 07:44:56PM -0700, Richard Stanaford wrote: > Recently. > > I did a successful upgrade from 4.0-RELEASE to STABLE on the DX4/100 just last > week. The changes to binutils had been committed for some time I believe. After watching days of this from various people, I decide

Re: Signal 11 on 4-Stable buildworld; bad memory or what?

2000-07-17 Thread Shawn Barnhart
- Original Message - From: "Chad R. Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | You mean, no problems you've noticed. You may very well be right | about no problems, but please be aware that Windows will not | detect/report many errors that will trip up FreeBSD. Quiet data | corruption is the sometim

Re: (KAME-snap 2950) Re: KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge

2000-07-17 Thread itojun
>The 'hack' restores general functionality. the hack brings a buggy behavior back. xbone relied upon the buggy behavior. >The current KAME code does not support multiple tunnels between two >hosts on a single interface. This restores that capability, which is >required for sett

Re: bioscall.s

2000-07-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 05:20:29PM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote: > Could someone please offer a brief explanation about the nature of > the change to the binutils? Binutils 2.10.0 now accepts (read requires) proper AT&T ASM syntax. Previous versions required a bastardized syntax that was neither p

Re: (KAME-snap 2947) Re: KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge

2000-07-17 Thread Joe Touch
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote: > > >> do you have xbone userland tool in freebsd master repository? > >> i believed not. xserver is officially supported by freebsd and > >> userland tools are in the tree. the situation looks different for me. > >The xbone port has been submitted to the ports

Re: (KAME-snap 2942) Re: KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge

2000-07-17 Thread Joe Touch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> is there any reason why the (misnamed, but that's another issue) XBONEHACK > >> option was eliminated during the recent KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge? (File > >> /usr/src/sys/net/if_gif.c.) It took us a while to get this added to KAME, > >> and we'd really like to se

XFree86 4.0.1 port fails "don't know how to make: clean"

2000-07-17 Thread Graham Menhennitt
I sent this to the ports mailing list but didn't get a reply. I'll try here... Has anybody had any success with building the XFree86 4.0.1 port (on 4-Stable, although I doubt that it makes an difference)? I've tried a few times and I always get: don't know how to make: clean in the "doc"

Re: bioscall.s

2000-07-17 Thread Kent Stewart
Richard Stanaford wrote: > > --- Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I am doing this on a 336MHz Celeron. I did a clean upgrade to STABLE from > > > 4.0-RELEASE on my DX4/100 box and I did use the quotes without difficulty. > > > > Recently or before 7 July. My first build was on

Re: Signal 11 on 4-Stable buildworld; bad memory or what?

2000-07-17 Thread David Uhring
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > --- David Uhring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Walter Campbell wrote: > > > > > You might also check the cpu temperature during the compile. Using a > > > K6-3/450, > > > my cpu cooler was getting quite hot to the touc

Re: bioscall.s

2000-07-17 Thread Richard Stanaford
--- Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am doing this on a 336MHz Celeron. I did a clean upgrade to STABLE from > > 4.0-RELEASE on my DX4/100 box and I did use the quotes without difficulty. > > Recently or before 7 July. My first build was on a P-II 400 and it is > only slightly fast

Re: Signal 11 on 4-Stable buildworld; bad memory or what?

2000-07-17 Thread Richard Stanaford
--- "Rodney W. Grimes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Becareful, you may have eliminated your heat problem, but you have now > created an excelent static electricity generator. High volumes of air > moving over just about anything will build static at an alarming rate! One word... Febreeze

Re: bioscall.s

2000-07-17 Thread Kent Stewart
Richard Stanaford wrote: > > --- Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just to make sure that from /usr/src you are doing a > > > > make installkernel KERNEL=NOVA > > I may have used .. > > make buildkernel KERNEL="NOVA" The quotes are evil. One my first kernel I left if buildkernel

Re: bioscall.s

2000-07-17 Thread Richard Stanaford
--- Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to make sure that from /usr/src you are doing a > > make installkernel KERNEL=NOVA I may have used .. make buildkernel KERNEL="NOVA" If the quotes are evil I would have expected it to make more than just 'as' mad. I'm going to CVSup, bu

Assembler probs and 4.1-RELEASE...

2000-07-17 Thread Richard Stanaford
Hello everyone, I saw a message posted earlier regarding assembler problems while compiling BIOS code either during a kernel build or a Buildworld. I too am having such a problem. I was attempting to build a kernel and got some spam regarding invalid assembler instructions while dealing with a

Re: buildkernel failure: netinet6/esp_core.c

2000-07-17 Thread Lars Eggert
Kent Stewart wrote: > I just finish cvsup'ing and have completed a buildworld and > buildkernel without any problems. Did you cvsup'ed such that you have > the crypto files since they are part of src-all now days. Of course this was the problem. Thanks, Kent! -- Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge

2000-07-17 Thread Lars Eggert
Kris Kennaway wrote: > > is there any reason why the (misnamed, but that's another issue) XBONEHACK > > option was eliminated during the recent KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge? (File > > /usr/src/sys/net/if_gif.c.) It took us a while to get this added to KAME, > > and we'd really like to see it merged i

Re: buildkernel failure: netinet6/esp_core.c

2000-07-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Lars Eggert wrote: > Building a kernel (config file attached) on a freshly updated -stable > system fails with: Did you cvsup the src-sys-crypto collection? Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge

2000-07-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Lars Eggert wrote: > Hi, > > is there any reason why the (misnamed, but that's another issue) XBONEHACK > option was eliminated during the recent KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge? (File > /usr/src/sys/net/if_gif.c.) It took us a while to get this added to KAME, > and we'd really li

Re: Problem with installworld

2000-07-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Adam wrote: > 4.0 cd subscription:$25 > Time spent installing: 10-15 min > cvsup to -stable: ~10-15 min > buildworld: 1.5 hours > Reading UPDATING: free > re-reading e

Re: buildkernel failure: netinet6/esp_core.c

2000-07-17 Thread Kent Stewart
Lars Eggert wrote: > > Building a kernel (config file attached) on a freshly updated -stable > system fails with: > > cc -c -O3 -pipe -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -Wall > -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline

RE: 2 different problems

2000-07-17 Thread Johan Huldtgren
Rene de Vries wrote: > I've seen problems during an installworld when using -j x (where x > 1). I > only do a buildworld using -j 4 and then use ordinary make (without -j) for > the install. A -j 5 will sometimes try to create files in a directory one of > the other make sub processes still has t

Re: buildworld problems (4.0-RELEASE to 4.0-STABLE)

2000-07-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 12:55:57PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The box either reboots part-way through, or I see something like this : The machine either has a serious problem, or your /usr/src/* is not consistent with the bits that make up RELENG_4 (4-STABLE), or your /usr/obj/* contains c

Re: bioscall.s

2000-07-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:58:06AM -0400, Keith Mackay wrote: > Is there a known issue in bioscall.s? Yes, it has been documented all over the place in this mailing list. It is also documented in /usr/src/UPDATING. You should review the expectations of running -STABLE and consider if you are bet

Re: How to installworld remotely?

2000-07-17 Thread Jim King
Philippe Le Berre wrote: > After being through the high numbers of emails on the new *build* > procedure, I still haven't see any hint on how to handle the make > installworld remotely. Can I do it without the shutdown? Can I remotely log > on *shutdown* system ? Do I have to fly to the box? > > T

Re: Signal 11 on 4-Stable buildworld; bad memory or what?

2000-07-17 Thread David Uhring
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Walter Campbell wrote: > > The FreeBSD install I'm using had previously been running on a generic Dell > > Pentium 200 and lived through a half-dozen buildworlds without breaking. > > > > Since I haven't seen a anyone else's world breaking this way, I'm assuming > > that this

Upgrading to 4.0

2000-07-17 Thread winter
When I got upto the step "cd /usr/src/sys/modules" "make install" I got this error: boxster:/usr/src/sys/modules# make ===> aha Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/sys/modules/aha make: don't know how to make opt_cam.h. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop. boxster:/usr/src/sys/mod

Re: How to installworld remotely?

2000-07-17 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 01:12:06PM -0700, Philippe Le Berre wrote: > After being through the high numbers of emails on the new *build* > procedure, I still haven't see any hint on how to handle the make > installworld remotely. Can I do it without the shutdown? Can I remotely log > on *shutdown