Re: Linux Wordperfect on 4.0-STABLE (specific issue)

2000-05-12 Thread Kent Stewart
Check the archives. WP8/Linux starts in about 2 seconds when you have everything right. There are conflicts when you have ports closed and it hangs trying to connect to a service or something. There was a comment by Grog and a follow up by the person with a similar problem. It had to be here on st

2.2.8 to 4.0 Stable

2000-05-12 Thread Serial # 19781010
I have a box running 2.2.8 release and I need to get it to 4.0 What is the best way to accomplish this via cvsup?? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: ucd-snmp

2000-05-12 Thread Shawn Barnhart
- Original Message - From: "Cy Schubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Patrick Seal writes: | > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 01:44:57PM -0700i, Chad R. Larson wrote: | > > I think they're pointing out the difference between "pkg_delete", a | > > binary part of the syst

Re: ucd-snmp

2000-05-12 Thread Pedro Almeida
in any case I propose: pkg_info | grep -i package_to_remove | xargs pkg_delete cheers, Pedro On 12-May-2000 Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Patrick Seal writes: >> On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 01:44:57PM -0700i, Chad R. Larson wrote: >> > I think they're point

Re: ucd-snmp

2000-05-12 Thread Cy Schubert
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Patrick Seal writes: > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 01:44:57PM -0700i, Chad R. Larson wrote: > > I think they're pointing out the difference between "pkg_delete", a > > binary part of the system, and "pkg_remove", a perl script in ports. > > Whoops! Anyway, looking at t

Re: ucd-snmp

2000-05-12 Thread Patrick Seal
On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 01:44:57PM -0700i, Chad R. Larson wrote: > I think they're pointing out the difference between "pkg_delete", a > binary part of the system, and "pkg_remove", a perl script in ports. Whoops! Anyway, looking at the source code, what's so great about it? Why should anyone use

Re: ucd-snmp

2000-05-12 Thread Chad R. Larson
As I recall, Patrick Seal wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:11:05PM -0700i, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group >wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sheldon Hearn writes: > > > > The pkg_remove port is quite handy. It's a utility I'd like to see in > > the base system. > > Thats w

Panic when playing sound in -STABLE?

2000-05-12 Thread Mike C. Muir
Hi there, This morning I attempted to play some mp3s after last nights rebuild, including a new kernel: (Please excuse the formatting as i wrote it down shorthand :D Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = su

Re: ucd-snmp

2000-05-12 Thread Patrick Seal
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:11:05PM -0700i, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sheldon Hearn writes: > > The pkg_remove port is quite handy. It's a utility I'd like to see in > the base system. Thats why it is. Where did you think it came from? /usr/

make world fails at 'truss' (even with sed/main.c patch)

2000-05-12 Thread Rudy Rucker
I'm getting a failure in usr.bin/truss/. ioctl.c complains about not finging sys/random.h To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: Flag for NTP slew only?

2000-05-12 Thread Harlan Stenn
It might be better to use "ntp -g" at startup, and make sure you run the "ntp-wait" script before bumping the securelevel. It would probably be a mistake to force slewalways. I believe ntpdate will not be around for much longer (maybe a year, probably less). H To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E