RE: ps does not work after a cvsupdate to 4.0-STABLE

2000-05-09 Thread David Miller
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Henk Wevers wrote: > > Yes i did, i found the solution in the Dutch FreeBSD mailinglist > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ IIRC. > > libkvm is out of sync. [make libkvm and ps] > This did work fine. I suffered the same problem, and got to wondering; why would make buildworld afte

Re: Server Farms?

2000-05-09 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >use procmail. > >a non-HEAD commit email will look like this: Thank you for the suggestion but I already make extensive use of procmail for sorting signal and noise and have an existing filter to do this for me. The suggestion was not meant to make m

Re: FreeBSD 2.2.8 gone for good?

2000-05-09 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Peter Jeremy wrote: >On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 02:35:16AM +1000, Matt Heckaman wrote: >>Don't bet on that, here's an interesting story of mine: >> >>I sent two letters on the same day, from the same post office here in >>Montreal, Canada. I sent one letter express, one letter n

Re: new kernel build procedure

2000-05-09 Thread Eric Ogren
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 10:52:50PM -0700, Ken Keeler wrote: > I was playing around with a couple of my new 4.0 stable machines tonight > and discovered if /usr/obj is deleted the new make buildkernel > installkernel process fails. This is intended. The point of "make [build|install]kernel is to

Re: Server Farms?

2000-05-09 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Brandon D. Valentine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000509 14:27] wrote: > On Tue, 9 May 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > >Yup and yup, subscribe to the security mailing list and the CVS > >mailing list, take special note of all changes done to RELENG_4 > >(-stable) when you see any special ones that yo

Re: Server Farms?

2000-05-09 Thread James Housley
"Brandon D. Valentine" wrote: > > that would contain all cvs commits sans HEAD. Most of the committs > happen to HEAD, but a good many STABLE users subscribe to cvs-all > watching and waiting for commits to whichever STABLE branch they are on. I tried watching cvs-all for awhile but stopped for

Re: Server Farms?

2000-05-09 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Shawn Barnhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000509 14:32] wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Alfred Perlstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > | Also, running a local cvsup-mirror is as easy as: > | cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-mirror && make install > | answer a few questions... and you're set.

Re: Server Farms?

2000-05-09 Thread Shawn Barnhart
- Original Message - From: "Alfred Perlstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Also, running a local cvsup-mirror is as easy as: | cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-mirror && make install | answer a few questions... and you're set. Is this documented anywhere? I'd really like to run a local cvsup mirror

Re: Server Farms?

2000-05-09 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >Yup and yup, subscribe to the security mailing list and the CVS >mailing list, take special note of all changes done to RELENG_4 >(-stable) when you see any special ones that you think may be >essential, then run your update. I am not sure whether thi

Re: FreeBSD 2.2.8 gone for good?

2000-05-09 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 02:35:16AM +1000, Matt Heckaman wrote: >Don't bet on that, here's an interesting story of mine: > >I sent two letters on the same day, from the same post office here in >Montreal, Canada. I sent one letter express, one letter normal mail. ... [The further you post a letter,

Re: FreeBSD 2.2.8 gone for good?

2000-05-09 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 01:48:31PM +1000, Chad R. Larson wrote: >I'd also point out that you can use anonymous CVS, or CVSup to fetch >the 2.2.8-STABLE source tree and build it yourself... You'll need a 2.x machine to do this. You definitely can't build 2.x on a 4.x machine, and I suspect you ca

Re: Server Farms?

2000-05-09 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000509 14:09] wrote: > I love being able to track bug fixes and such via cvsup and -stable > branches. But it's not really an appropriate process to sup and make > buildworld on every server in a hundred server farm. Of course it isn't, that's why you can buil

Re: Server Farms?

2000-05-09 Thread John Reynolds~
[ On Tuesday, May 9, David Miller wrote: ] > I love being able to track bug fixes and such via cvsup and -stable > branches. But it's not really an appropriate process to sup and make > buildworld on every server in a hundred server farm. > > Is there some way to roll binary only changes off on

Server Farms?

2000-05-09 Thread David Miller
I love being able to track bug fixes and such via cvsup and -stable branches. But it's not really an appropriate process to sup and make buildworld on every server in a hundred server farm. Is there some way to roll binary only changes off one server tracking -stable? Secondly, is there any exi