Trying to install 4.0-STABLE on laptop

2000-04-14 Thread Gunnar Flygt
Is there anyone else getting the same problems as I? Problem is, I start the kern floppy and get: /boot.config: -P Keyboard:yes BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 Console: internal video/keyboard BIOS drive A: is disk0 BIOS drive C: is disk1 BIOS 639kB/64448kB available memory FreeBSD/i386 bo

Re: middle mouse button emulation broken

2000-04-14 Thread Kevin M. Dulzo
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 04:48:59PM -0400, Sean O'Connell wrote: > I'd like to report a "Me too" on Robert Watson's report of > middle mouse emulation breakage under X. I just updated a > laptop (touchpad with 2 button mouse) running 4.0-RELEASE > to 4.0-STABLE using sources cvsup'd this mornin

Re: middle mouse button emulation broken

2000-04-14 Thread Sean O'Connell
Hi- I'd like to report a "Me too" on Robert Watson's report of middle mouse emulation breakage under X. I just updated a laptop (touchpad with 2 button mouse) running 4.0-RELEASE to 4.0-STABLE using sources cvsup'd this morning. The cut and paste features under X (and to a lesser extent on th

Re: Sound Blaster Live! 4.0 (Re: 4.1 date?)

2000-04-14 Thread Frank Mayhar
Bryan Bradsby wrote: > No problems here since Tuesday: 4.0-S, K7, SB Live, sony CD-RW > Plays music CDs great. No reboots. Do _you_ have ECC memory? (Otter didn't, btw; I'm just trying to establish a pattern.) -- Frank Mayhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.exit.com/ To Unsubscribe: send ma

Re: Sound Blaster Live! 4.0 (Re: 4.1 date?)

2000-04-14 Thread Bryan Bradsby
> > > Just beware that it may spontaneously reboot your machine. > > > > Why would it do that? > > Because (as advertised) it is still an alpha test project, which > is why it hasn't been ported to -Stable yet. Additional datapoint. No problems here since Tuesday: 4.0-S, K7, SB Live,

intel etherexpress 16 (ISA) card

2000-04-14 Thread vladimir-bsd-stable
I've been unable to make these cards work on a 4.0-stable cvsup'ed a couple of days ago. I assume it is using ie driver, here is the line from the kernel config: device ie0 at isa? port 0x300 irq 5 iomem 0xd8000 That's the only NIC that I've left in the kernel config. I have used intel's sof

Re: sendmail.mc

2000-04-14 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 11:37:42AM -0700, Steve VanDevender wrote: > The point here is not whether or not I can rebuild or restore the system > customizations I've made; the point is that doing the FreeBSD update > eliminated an existing customized configuration that was pretty > important. Fortu

Re: Aureal Vortex2 (Mx300) driver?

2000-04-14 Thread Andy
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just a doubt? > Is there anyone working on a Aureal Vortex 2 driver? > I mean, a not kernel-panic version? I think the issue may be that Aureal won't release their chip specs without paying some exhorbitant fee. I spoke wi

Re: sendmail.mc

2000-04-14 Thread Steve VanDevender
Daniel C. Sobral writes: > And you can do it too with FreeBSD. It requires that you install the > source. Sure, it's bigger than what Solaris have, but we offer much > more. As I said, we do things different. If you are going to pick on the > amount of source code you must install, I'll pick o

Re: sendmail.mc

2000-04-14 Thread Steve VanDevender
Chad R. Larson writes: > As I recall, Steve VanDevender wrote: > > Updating from FreeBSD 3.2 to 4.0 stomped on that customized > > configuration, without any warning that was apparent to us, and we > > didn't find out until one of the other admins noticed that it was no > > longer building th

Re: SlickEdit for FreeBSD (fwd)

2000-04-14 Thread Mike Smith
> Is anyone using SlickEdit for Linux under emulation? The vendor does not > seem interested in producing a native version... I looked at it a while back; it worked fine. The only real issue I had with it was that you needed (then) to brand a couple of binaries for the install to work correctl

Re: sendmail.mc

2000-04-14 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Steve VanDevender wrote: > > The point is that you _can_ build a customized sendmail configuration > file in Solaris 7 with the base OS distribution, which is much more > common than wanting to build a customized binary. We're using the stock > FreeBSD sendmail binary, but needed to change vario

Re: sendmail.mc

2000-04-14 Thread Chad R. Larson
As I recall, Steve VanDevender wrote: > Updating from FreeBSD 3.2 to 4.0 stomped on that customized > configuration, without any warning that was apparent to us, and we > didn't find out until one of the other admins noticed that it was no > longer building the proper alias databases. RCS is your