Re: 4.0, OpenSSL and MD5 (fwd)

2000-04-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > No, Doug is actually wrong about this. The NO and YES values > are checked and do make a difference. Actually you're both right. USA_RESIDENT is one of the few variable which has the value checked. Skimming through make.conf, I think it's actuall

dual booting win2k and freebsd ?

2000-04-13 Thread Keith Chiem
Anyone succeed in doing this ? I've dual booted freebsd with linux, win 95, win 98, and nt 4.0. For some reason, I can't get it to work with Windows 2000. --k To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: 4.0, OpenSSL and MD5 (fwd)

2000-04-13 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
No, Doug is actually wrong about this. The NO and YES values are checked and do make a difference. - Jordan > At 12:56 pm -0700 13/4/00, Doug Barton wrote: > >or it is not defined. The entries in /etc/make.conf could be set equal to > >"hairy blue pelicans" and it would not matter. In make.conf

Re: 4.0, OpenSSL and MD5 (fwd)

2000-04-13 Thread Robin Melville
At 12:56 pm -0700 13/4/00, Doug Barton wrote: >or it is not defined. The entries in /etc/make.conf could be set equal to >"hairy blue pelicans" and it would not matter. In make.conf syntax you do >have to set it equal to something to define it Hmmm, does this mean that USA_RESIDENT=NO in make.con

Re: sendmail.mc

2000-04-13 Thread Randy Bush
>> is the assumption of the one-time build really that acceptable? > Hey, wait a second! Why do you think SENDMAIL_CF exists? Just add it to > your make.conf pointing to your own .cf file, and add the mc to the > appropriate directory. is the assumption of the one-time build really that acceptabl

Re: 4.1 date?

2000-04-13 Thread Kent Stewart
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote: > > > > > I'm running it happily on an all SCSI machine (I wanted the SBLive > > support), but it's by no means clean and by no means ready for > > full production use, IMO. This is a .0 release and lots of people > > are waiting for the .1 release before using it

Re: Sound Blaster Live! 4.0 (Re: 4.1 date?)

2000-04-13 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
> > Just beware that it may spontaneously reboot your machine. > Why would it do that? Did it do that for you? Tom Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: 4.1 date?

2000-04-13 Thread Doug Barton
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Peter Radcliffe wrote: > "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably said: > > I didn't see Sound Blaster Live (emu10k1) support under 4.0. I did see it > > on 5.0 current though. > > Two people have posted instructions on using the 5.0 driver for the SBlive > under

Re: 4.0, OpenSSL and MD5 (fwd)

2000-04-13 Thread Doug Barton
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Frank Seltzer wrote: > On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Build your world with NODESCRYPTLINKS=yes, or if you're doing a binary > > install then point the libcrypt links to libscrypt manually post-install. > > I used > > make -DNODESCRYPTLINKS=true {bui

Re: sendmail.mc

2000-04-13 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Randy Bush wrote: > > > /usr/src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc is what you are looking to replace. > > > > If you don't want future cvsup's to quash your changes you'll want to do > > a "chflags schg /usr/src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc" after you have copied > > the new one into place. > > yucchhy! [ bu

Re: Acroread4

2000-04-13 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Wed, 12-Apr-2000 at 14:44:21 -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > > "WB" == Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > WB> WKB ~>acroread4 > WB> Floating point exception (core dumped) > > WB> on 3.4-stable. Is this what Vivek is seeing? > > I see no errors. It just works perfectly fine. > > O

Re: Acroread4

2000-04-13 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Wed, 12-Apr-2000 at 13:12:15 -0700, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wilko Bulte writes: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 10:38:04AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > > > > "A" == Asmodai writes: > > > > > > >> I don't think this is a 4.0 issue. I get

Re: 4.1 date?

2000-04-13 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
I tried that and it didn't work - nothing did. I tried with the most recent 4.0-STABLE snapshot and it works fine. Something changed between release and stable to allow it to finish the probe nicely. BTW - the only ISA cards I have are two NE2000 NICs and they have PNP mode off and are set to I