> At 05:55 PM 1/29/00 +0100, you wrote:
> >After make buildworld and make installworld...
> >
> >Everything looks fine until loading of final daemons..
> >
> >FATAL TRAP 12: pagefault in kernel mode
> >fault virtual address = 0x45058
> >fault code = supervisor read, page not present
> >current pr
At 05:55 PM 1/29/00 +0100, you wrote:
>After make buildworld and make installworld...
>
>Everything looks fine until loading of final daemons..
>
>FATAL TRAP 12: pagefault in kernel mode
>fault virtual address = 0x45058
>fault code = supervisor read, page not present
>current process = 117 (mountd
After make buildworld and make installworld...
Everything looks fine until loading of final daemons..
FATAL TRAP 12: pagefault in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x45058
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
current process = 117 (mountd)
All I can do it reboot...
HELP!
I can sti
> Why logging filesystems don't work:
>
> You generally (with the hardware available in PCs now)
> can't tell the difference between:
>
> 1) loss of power (ok!)
> 2) crash where the filesystem datastructures weren't corrupted (ok!)
> 3) crash where the filesystem datastructures were corrupted (
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
> Personally, I decided to boycott the i810 chipset. I am absolutely
> opposed to chipsets including graphics and audio controllers. And IMHO
> now Intel Corp. attacks the makers of graphics and audio cards,
> imposing [even] more restrictions on our fre
Carl Makin wrote:
>
> Has anybody played around with porting the agpgart.o Linux kernel module
> to FreeBSD 3.4?
>
> Unfortunately I'm not up to the port myself however I'll help with testing
> it if anyone else is doing it!
>
We had to reject five i810e-based PCs because they wasn't capable
o
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> Bad news: people running depending on _only_ logging are kidding themselves.
Yeah. Funny how they have been doing so without getting bitten, eh?
--
Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"If you consider our help
Hi,
Since upgrading to the latest STABLE this morning, dummynet is complaining
with a series of
dolomite /kernel: -- dummynet: warning, event is 1 ticks late
I was running with a version from 40 days ago prior to upgrading this morning.
I have
options "ICMP_BANDLIM"
options
Cy Schubert wrote:
>
> > > Due to the lack of interest, FreeBSD's LFS has fallen into disrepair
> > > over the years. With the implementation of softupdates in FreeBSD I
> > > don't think there is any need for LFS any more.
> >
> > Repeat that over and over the next time you wait fsck finish a 4
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel C. Sobral" writes:
> Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> >
> > 4.4BSD has something like JFS, LFS (Log Structured Filesystem). LFS
> > developed from a paper by John Ousterhout, the same fellow who
> > developed Tcl & Tk. All other log structur
At 01:22 AM 1/31/2000 -0600, Soren Dayton wrote:
>The major and minor numbers are correct (and I did a MAKEDEV). But,
>if I try to just check on things:
>
> $ mt stat
> mt: /dev/nrsa0: Device not configured
>
>Anyone have any ideas? Does this ring any bells? What on earth did I
* Gary Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000130 22:55] wrote:
> Tom wrote in message ID
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> >
> > > > Due to the lack of interest, FreeBSD's LFS has fallen into disrepair
> > > > over the years. With the implementation of softupdate
12 matches
Mail list logo
