I have 2 physicaly seperate segments of the same subnet that I need to
connect logicaly. I have a FreeBSD gateway/firewall machine on both of
the subnets conected to the corporate network.
Specificaly, I have an existing network 170.85.106.* netmask
255.25
> [moved to -stable from -security]
>
> "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Adam Laurie wrote,
> > > Crist J. Clark wrote:
> > > > > Anyway, to cut a long story short, I would prefer to simply do something
> > > > > in /etc/rc.local to force the console back to local kb/vga, or disab
the 2 solutions are not bound. You can use one or the other.
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
>
> On 13-Jan-00 David Berard wrote:
> > 1. make a "lptcontrol -p" before using the printer, to configure the
> > parallel port in poll mode.
> >
> > 2. modify the ppc entry in the kernel config file,
On 13-Jan-00 David Berard wrote:
> 1. make a "lptcontrol -p" before using the printer, to configure the
> parallel port in poll mode.
>
> 2. modify the ppc entry in the kernel config file, and build a new
> kernel
>--- device ppc0at isa? port? flags 0x40 net irq 7
>+++ device
Hello,
I 've got it several times:
portmap[16116]: connect from 195.31.252.2 to dump(): request from
unauthorized host.
It is harmless but annoying.
Is there any way to prevent portman listening requests on a NIC, ip,
etc. besides using hosts.allow?
Thanks,
Gawel
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
Hello,
I want to thanks people that answer me :
Trond Endretol, Vivek Khera, Michel Talon and Gert-Jan Vons
They proposed to me 2 solutions :
1. make a "lptcontrol -p" before using the printer, to configure the
parallel port in poll mode.
2. modify the ppc entry in the kernel config f
[moved to -stable from -security]
"Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Laurie wrote,
> > Crist J. Clark wrote:
> > > > Anyway, to cut a long story short, I would prefer to simply do something
> > > > in /etc/rc.local to force the console back to local kb/vga, or disable
> > > > the
At 11:21 PM -0500 2000/1/8, Snuffles on Sonata wrote:
> Some of us remember 4.1 and 4.2 as well. :-)
Some of us remember 2.9BSD on a PDP 11/70 with two banks of 64KB RAM. ;-)
And some of remember the day we saw a 15% performance increase on
that machine, when one of the loca
