Brad Knowles wrote:
>
> In -CURRENT, I would say that this could probably be committed,
> if John feels safe. I am not yet convinced that it should be
> committed to -STABLE, although things do look good so far.
Just to clarify, I committed it to -current already this morning.
John
T
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Mr. K. wrote:
> Is there somewhere I can download disk images and to a full network
> install? I have a cablemodem so minimal install should be quick and
> painless.
ftp.freebsd.org? :)
Kris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable"
Note: I'm sending this to just the -current list, since it's pretty
clear that this change won't be ready for -stable anytime this year...
(hopefully Alfred is in -current?)
At 3:02 PM -0800 12/9/99, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> > On Tue, 07-Dec-1999 at
At 3:00 PM -0800 1999/12/9, Julian Elischer wrote:
> so can it be committed?
In -CURRENT, I would say that this could probably be committed,
if John feels safe. I am not yet convinced that it should be
committed to -STABLE, although things do look good so far.
--
These are my op
At 8:56 PM +0100 1999/12/9, Brad Knowles wrote:
> So far, it looks like it might have fixed the problem. At least,
> the "InUse" count goes down when a route goes away:
Things continue to look good:
Thu Dec 9 20:59:15 CET 1999
netstat -ran | wc -l
122
vmstat -m | grep rout
so can it be committed?
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Joe Greco wrote:
> The patch previously mentioned has completely fixed my problem, as far as I
> can tell.
>
> routetbl 13117K 25K 40960K936240 0 16,32,64,128,256
>
> after a day of uptime.
>
> > here's mine..
> > this is
Is there somewhere I can download disk images and to a full network
install? I have a cablemodem so minimal install should be quick and
painless.
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Christopher Michaels wrote:
> Which reminds me. Now that -RC is coming. I remember someone was trying to
> co-ordinate some bet
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > > I've been reviewing this patch with someone and I think the last
> > > version is ready to commit. I'll take a look at my tree to make
> > > sure.
> >
> On Tue, 07-Dec-1999 at 14:55:37 -0800, Alfred
Which reminds me. Now that -RC is coming. I remember someone was trying to
co-ordinate some beta testing. Alas, I forgot who that was an if he (or
she) was still co-ordinating it?
If so, I wonder if there is anything I could do, other than "make world"
that would be of use?
-Chris
> -Ori
The patch previously mentioned has completely fixed my problem, as far as I
can tell.
routetbl 13117K 25K 40960K936240 0 16,32,64,128,256
after a day of uptime.
> here's mine..
> this is from a single homed machine, with a default route. it's also a IRC
> server (irc.
Theo PAGTZIS writes:
This is definetely a paradox...
A stable which is not stable...what is it (enigma) ?
Give me a break. Everyone makes mistakes.
rone
--
Insultant: n. Contract worker who gets paid an obscene hourly wage to insult
full-time company employees.
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:49:15PM -0500, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> !>On a probably related matter we had a lot of processes die with signal 4
> !>(one or two a day). We swapped the RAM and I thought it had stopped but
> !>one died yesterday (telnetd). Previously running make index in /usr/ports
> !>
At 10:29 AM -0800 1999/12/9, John Polstra wrote:
> Thanks for helping me test it!
So far, it looks like it might have fixed the problem. At least,
the "InUse" count goes down when a route goes away:
Thu Dec 9 20:14:03 CET 1999
netstat -ran | wc -l
123
vmstat -m | grep routetbl
13 matches
Mail list logo
