On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Morten Seeberg wrote:
> Revising the release times for 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 I know realise that I´ve
> just misunderstood the way -STABLE works :) And that I should just start
> using RELEASE on my production machines, instead of -STABLE, which I thought
> was "better"/"more sta
> > Have any of you been seeing route table leaks in -current? I noticed
> > this week that cvsup-master.freebsd.org is suffering from them. I
> > actually had to reboot it because it couldn't allocate any more. From
> > the "vmstat -m" output:
> >
> > Memory statistics by type
> At 08:51 AM 12/8/99 -0600, Joe Greco wrote:
> >Most of which are routes pointing at the 3 private-net interfaces on the
> >machine.
>
> The info was provided more as a comparison, that quantity of routes do not
> necessary mean leak ? Or perhaps it does. But after 90 days, you would
> think t
At 08:51 AM 12/8/99 -0600, Joe Greco wrote:
>Most of which are routes pointing at the 3 private-net interfaces on the
>machine.
The info was provided more as a comparison, that quantity of routes do not
necessary mean leak ? Or perhaps it does. But after 90 days, you would
think the problem wo
The latest release of ntpd will try the POSIX sched stuff, and if those do
not work, fall back to rtprio(), and if that does not work, nice() (more or
less - I'm not looking at the code).
H
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the messa
> >Hell, I've been seeing this for well over a year. The last time I mentioned
> >it, everybody seemed to think I was nuts. :-)
> >
> >FreeBSD 3.0-19981015-BETA #1: Tue Jan 12 03:30:56 CST 1999
> >
> > routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 4357410 0
> 16,32,64,128,256
>
> Well, I h
David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
> >
> > I asked the same question abot a month ago and didn't get an answer. A
> > quick search of the archives will find some others with the same
> > problem. It seems to
>
> I got the report, but got bus
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
>
> I asked the same question abot a month ago and didn't get an answer. A
> quick search of the archives will find some others with the same
> problem. It seems to
I got the report, but got busy and forgot about it (as it has neve
On 08-Dec-99 David Wolfskill wrote:
>>From: "Sameer R. Manek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 21:05:38 -0800
> Unless I'm confused rather more than is usual -- which is by no means
> especially unlikely -- that also assumes that the "spare box" hardware is
> sufficiently close to that
